The same quest that the same heroes for some reason pass a second time. Objectively, everything is filmed and played well, there is no point in picking on actors, special effects and staging scenes. It's just that this sequel is impossibly unnecessary, and yes, I know that was the case in the book, but first of all, King's work is
more
The same quest that the same heroes for some reason pass a second time. Objectively, everything is filmed and played well, there is no point in picking on actors, special effects and staging scenes. It's just that this sequel is impossibly unnecessary, and yes, I know that was the case in the book, but first of all, King's work is a lot of praise, and secondly, there's a lot in the book that's changed in the film. And these "Musketeers 20 years later" were not needed here at all, and the filmmakers themselves probably understood this, but it beckons a long buck, beckons. A lot of nonsense at the concept level: - One of the heroes committed suicide because the events of his childhood broke him. When they left the city, they hardly remembered what had happened. - In the first film, the girl killed her despot father. She fucking killed him. Now it turns out that he lived for many years, and only recently died. She has already perfectly understood that she is not talking to her grandmother, but with a monster, but for some reason continues to drink tea. - Penya used to eat only children who were afraid of him. Now he was quietly whipping a girl who sent him to hell, and then pityed him. Isn’t that the key to defeating him? - It is shown that Penya was once a real person, he has an old picture from the circus. But he is also an alien, a destroyer of worlds. Understand as you wish. In general, there are a lot of such nonsense, but I do not even want to analyze them. Because the film is clearly tortured and unnecessary. Maybe that's why even the writer who understood everything didn't bother much.
|