Nobody at the box office will hear your 'Scream' You know, it's a nice feeling to go to the first day of the premiere of a movie that everyone liked and run home to write a negative review to show what a non-standard taste you have. So with the new ' Scream' this did not happen, and therefore for a week I can not bring myself to write a sincere review about a film that really liked. Well, because how to write in general about this: the fifth part ' Scream' this is a very cool movie, which is worth going to everyone (who has already gone to ' Liquor pizza' of course).
Seriously, the first 'Scream' filmed after the death of the master of horror Wes Craven is difficult to make any claims. This is a great entertainment film, shot with great respect for the heritage of the original, but aimed primarily at a young audience. For twenty years since the premiere of the first film, the film industry has changed very much, and now the ball is ruled not by the so-called youth, for whom such young-adult horror films were shot, but by schoolchildren, for whom the main representation is their peers from very strange cases. Therefore, it is a pleasure to see again on the screens of thirty-year-olds who commit suicide in the fresh air. Initially, the project caused fears, it was announced, they say, for the first time in the franchise the fifth & #39; Scream' will not be a meta-commentary on the genre, but a horror with a serious face. But apparently, in this way, marketers tried to deceive a generation of new sincerity, because the film best manages to make fun of modern horror films. If in the last fourth part, old Craven drove through the remakes and a little through the film found, then now Netflix, A24 art horrors, podcasters and endless rethinkings of the classics have completely gone.
There were also fears that the young horrormakers Gilette and Bettinelli will not cope with the responsibility and shame the legacy of Craven, but, honestly, the fact that the great director for understandably sad reasons did not take part in the creation of the film you remember only before the final credits, when you see the inscription 'Dedicated to Wes' Guys are generally handsome: they showed themselves both as masters of suspense in the horror shorts of the V/H/S almanacs and Monsters of the South, and as meta-commentators of the genre in postironic horror ' I go search ' And here the duo of young directors did not hit the mud face, the only thing that, postironia was sometimes even too much, although for the same I do not really like the third Craven’s same ' Scream'. The return of the Trinity Courtney Cox, Neve Campbell and David Arquette, sorry for the analogy, could take place under the track ' Batya in the building' - in the best traditions of modern softbacks, the heroes of old films in the frame steal every scene and the young treat them the same way fans of the first films would treat them at a meeting. The only thing you can reproach the picture for is maybe for the not very bright new main character, but, come on, who needs it? Who remembers Hayden Penetierry from the fourth part, when we have Sidney Prescott performed by Neave Campbell, who, dotted with a knife and wounds from bullets, will destroy the whole brazen youngster with one left and calmly cover herself with a blanket and begin to poison stories about youth.
So, if you somehow deny yourself pleasure and do not run to the cinema, remember two of the most important conclusions from the film. 'Babaduk' still better. And in that eighth part you know what franchise from the director ' Get knives' heroine and the truth Mary Sue
P.S. I also noticed that in almost all reviews, our competent critics write in the negatives of the film that it ... (take in the chest more air). ..not scary!!! It is difficult to comment on such examples of brilliant critical thought, except that in this case you can still write in minuses ' Nightmare on Elm Street' that the main villain for some reason too often pronounces the word 'bitch'?
8 out of 10
Original