I think everyone has an understanding that when you remake a masterpiece, it has to be better than the original, otherwise it’s a failure. They'll compare everything.
It didn't work out better for me. Contrary to expectations, I wouldn’t call this series a failure. Of course, there must have been blunders, inconsistencies, mistakes
more
I think everyone has an understanding that when you remake a masterpiece, it has to be better than the original, otherwise it’s a failure. They'll compare everything. It didn't work out better for me. Contrary to expectations, I wouldn’t call this series a failure. Of course, there must have been blunders, inconsistencies, mistakes (if you look closely, it will seem strange who is shooting where or where and from where he is running). What is the cost of a fire that burns during a shower? But the main thing in such films is the general message. I think he succeeded. Showing a simple man in war, his heroism, dedication. There's plenty of that. I wanted to write that the series is beautiful for the younger generation (the original they will not watch, for them his time has already gone), but remembered about the scene in the bath. If we want kids to watch this movie, why show nude girls? And if it's for adults, then it's pointless, because the original is not surpassed. Well, it's two-fold. . .
|