For children, the cartoon is rather gloomy and confusing, and for adults it is completely non-conceptual, I expected more after "Puggles" from the same studio, where there was a lot of fun and at the same time the positions of psychiatry were interestingly played out. And here the plot is simple and linear, there is nothing to expect
more
For children, the cartoon is rather gloomy and confusing, and for adults it is completely non-conceptual, I expected more after "Puggles" from the same studio, where there was a lot of fun and at the same time the positions of psychiatry were interestingly played out. And here the plot is simple and linear, there is nothing to expect from him. I think the most interesting thing happens in the first few seconds, when the asteroid didn't kill the dinosaurs, and then it's like there's nothing to say. The combination of hyper-realistic landscapes and completely cartoonish rubber dinosaurs looks bad, it hit me the whole movie. A few logical oddities: diplodocus climb mountains, the legs of diplodocus bend, like spiders, in almost any direction, Arlo sometimes walks with a piece of insect, human smell is better than that of dinosaurs. That's a lot of nonsense. The joke about drugs was completely inexcusable, the children will not understand it, and they will be disturbed by what horror they saw. Also, children will not understand why dinosaurs and mammals exist at the same time. His father's death is almost entirely copied from Mufasa's death in The Lion King. Do you even need a man in this cartoon? If you replace it with any other animal, nothing will change. However, I liked three scenes: the illusion of a diplodocus in a fog turning into two tyrannosaurs, the encounter with the ghost of his father, and the drawing of a circle at the end. Yeah, that was strong. Otherwise, there is emptiness and darkness, and this is a sign that the dinosaur cartoon genre has outlived itself.
|