{short_descr}  more
poster
{title_prefix} {title}, {year} {serial}
{src_title}
{rated_collection}
{country}
{genre}
Director:
  {films_director}
{films_actor}
{afisha}
{list_descr}
{expected_rate}
{average}
average of
{true_nrates} rates
{show_imdb_rating}
{xrate}
  filmAdviser
  • About
  • Faq
  • Project news
  • Complains and suggestions
  • Feedback
  • Share page
  • Films and series
    • Movies
      All movies with your filter
      • 2025
      • 2024
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
      • 2011
      • 2010
      • 2009
      • 2008
      • 2007
      • 2006
      • 2005
      • 2004
      • 2003
      • 2002
      • 2001
      • 2000
      • Action
      • Adults
      • Adventure
      • Animation
      • Anime
      • Biographical
      • Comedy
      • Criminal
      • Detective
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Erotic
      • Family
      • Fantasy
      • History
      • Horror
      • Music
      • Musical
      • Romance
      • Fantastic
      • Short
      • Sports
      • Thriller
      • Video clips
      • War
      • Western
      • *west
      • American
      • *western europe
      • *east
      • *asia
      • *russia/ussr
      • English
      • French
      • Russian
      • German
      • *eastern europe
      • *latin america
      • Canadian
      • Japanese
      • Italian
      • *cis
      • *scandinavia
      • Australian
      • Indian
      • Mexican
      • Korean
      • Spanish
      • Soviet
    • Series
      All series with your filter
      • 2025
      • 2024
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
      • 2011
      • 2010
      • 2009
      • 2008
      • 2007
      • 2006
      • 2005
      • 2004
      • 2003
      • 2002
      • 2001
      • 2000
      • Action
      • Adults
      • Adventure
      • Animation
      • Anime
      • Biographical
      • Comedy
      • Criminal
      • Detective
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Erotic
      • Family
      • Fantasy
      • History
      • Horror
      • Music
      • Musical
      • Romance
      • Fantastic
      • Short
      • Sports
      • Thriller
      • Video clips
      • War
      • Western
      • *west
      • American
      • *western europe
      • *east
      • *asia
      • *russia/ussr
      • English
      • French
      • Russian
      • German
      • *eastern europe
      • *latin america
      • Canadian
      • Japanese
      • Italian
      • *cis
      • *scandinavia
      • Australian
      • Indian
      • Mexican
      • Korean
      • Spanish
      • Soviet
    • In cinema
    • Tspdt ratings (2024)
      • THE GREATEST MOVIES OF ALL TIME
        • Top1000
        • Starting list
      • MAIN MOVIES OF THE 21ST CENTURY
        • Top1000
        • Starting list
      • source: TSPDT
    • Watching now
      • Most actual movies on imdb
      • Most actual tv series on imdb
    • Awards
    • Movimakers rating
    • Studios rating
    • Collections
    • Tags
    • Rate movies
    • Request to add a movie
    • Add movie
    • Add person
    • Галера
  • Recommendations
  • Community
sign in   
Wish list
filter 
Movie filter
All results
You have new notifications
 
2001: A Space Odyssey, 1968
×
7.77 340316 10
IMDb8.3 

This movie doesn't have a trailer, available to russian users Add it please!
Frends' rates () Show Hide
 
?
Get forecast
Find out if you like this movie

2001: A Space Odyssey

1968 12+ 2 hours 29 min.
 Just watched

Did you like this movie?

 9
 7

 5

 3

Kn
Just watched? estimate it!
Or estimate more accurately
1
Awful
2
Very bad
3
Bad
4
Very poor
5
Poor
6
Fair
7
Good
8
Great
9
Excellent
10
Masterpiece
CM
Watched but can’t rate
Wish
Отложено

I will watch

First of all
Secondly
Sometime
Next movie
Haven't seen
Next recommended movie
Haven't seen
Watch
Find and watch in online cinemas
The ultimate trip.
Humanity finds a mysterious object buried beneath the lunar surface and sets off to find its origins with the help of HAL 9000, the world's most advanced super computer.
oscar
oscar
Oscar
1969
Best visual effects
bafta
bafta
British Film Academy
1969
Best soundtrack
Best artist's work
Best cameraman performance
About movie show more Hide
Countries:  UK USA
Genres:  Sci-Fi Adventure
Properties:
complex slow cruel fantastic brutal dramatic
Director:  Stanley Kubrick
Rating:  1000 Greatest Movies #3
additional information Show Hide
Writers:  Arthur Charles Clarke Stanley Kubrick
Producers:  Stanley Kubrick Victor Lyndon
Camerman:  Geoffrey Unsworth
Studios:  Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Stanley Kubrick Productions
Premiere: 02 April 1968
In russia: 30 August 2018
Budget:$12 000 000
Competitions: Moscow Film Festival
Moscow Film Festival
1969
NOMINATIONS
Gold prize
Oscar
Oscar
1969
Best visual effects
NOMINATIONS
Best original screenplay
The best scenery
Best director
Stanley Kubrick
British Film Academy
British Film Academy
1969
Best soundtrack
Best artist's work
Best cameraman performance
NOMINATIONS
United nations prize
Best movie
Collections:  Foreign cinema
Tags:  space odyssey spaceship space expedition computer space travel Year 2001 2001 Scene - Spacecraft alien earth view from space intelligence of aliens moon monolith Jupiter artificial intelligence open space evil computer travel famous replica Flashback surprise ending avant-garde space future UFO technology moon landing computer malfunction astronaut autism murder pilot aging psychedelic 1960s time travel cold war tights scientist alien technology desert evolution space station nasa 21st century stewardess doctor 2000s chess prehistoric times person versus computer sun baby tribe epic classical music bed quarantine revival outpost bedroom advice beating silence asteroid visionary watering hole existentialism vortex overture video recording computer chess mission news leopard vacuum metaphysics photographer Academy Award Oscar 1969 bafta award British Academy 1969 crater sphere uncertainty supercomputer bone winter satellite weightlessness singing space adventures cryonics cryogenics toilet skill messiah explosion deception star blockbuster asphyxia drawing airline sabotage minimalism famous melody in the film black tights spacewalk great ape Women's legs in stockings long shot cult film bathroom space hero avant-garde film elderly astronaut shock of the future Tights with patterns pay phone psychedelic image first contact rapid aging rescue module birthday jogging Fire inside rescue attempt visual metaphor cult classic space suit space exploration lip reading archaeological excavations prehistoric satellite antenna lunar base contact with stranger parade of planets hotel room solar system beaten to death top secret electromagnetic pulse air traffic jam video phone animal attack sudden depressurization killing animals stargate soundtrack compilation space shuttle father-daughter relationship science is getting out of control music for the film performed by an orchestra 70 mm film humanity versus machines waltz 'blue Danube' shooting from the hero's point of view small amount of dialogue mention of Karl Jung extreme close-up famous theme music at the beginning no credits at the beginning of the film independent film surrealism computer with speech output Classical Music as Soudtrack Strauss qq: That's what Zarathustra said. Based on the novel Unexpected ending Slow motion scene Flashforward Based on the story Camera shows in first person Hidden advertising of goods in cinema Freeze frame First part Cult director Ambiguous ending temporary cessation of vital functions Number in character name
Wiki
Cast:  Keir Dullea Gary Lockwood William Sylvester Daniel Richter Leonard Rossiter Margaret Tyzack Robert Beatty Sean Sullivan Douglas Rain Frank Miller Alan Gifford Ed Bishop Glenn Bek Ann Gillis
Found a mistake?

send
Trailer Related films Reviews Similar films
Related films (1) Show Hide
Sequels and prequels
2001: A Space Odyssey, 1968
2001: A Space Odyssey, 1968
2010: Odyssey Two, 1984
2010: Odyssey Two, 1984
The entire cinematic universe (2)
Reviews (5) Show Hide
01 March 2020
4
It's a pity the serpent won't make it to the king. Without a word of disillusionment, Kubrick didn't want me. I have to admit that fact for the 1968th rocku tse bouv broke. But for an hour, the commentary was written, neither the picture, nor the editing, nor the sound supravide I am not surprised. The plot is to swing overboard. And more
close
It's a pity the serpent won't make it to the king. Without a word of disillusionment, Kubrick didn't want me. I have to admit that fact for the 1968th rocku tse bouv broke. But for an hour, the commentary was written, neither the picture, nor the editing, nor the sound supravide I am not surprised. The plot is to swing overboard. And a brief look at the movie of knowledge on Youtube gave me a sense of yet another and the final not to be a party of that, shogo bachiti.

close
Nazar
1
22 January
10
I’m not afraid of chainsaw maniacs, but I’m afraid of seeing contact with aliens, as if I’m tormented by fast bands of color and strange sounds.
VIKULYa
31 May 2011
5
I expected to see a brilliant movie. The meaning of this creation (and also morality) can only be sucked out of the finger. What the director put into it, only he knew. Arthouse Arthouse, no other way.

The film has interesting plot "leads", but none of these leads resulted in an exciting storyline.

So more
close
I expected to see a brilliant movie.


The meaning of this creation (and also morality) can only be sucked out of the finger. What the director put into it, only he knew. Arthouse Arthouse, no other way.

The film has interesting plot "leads", but none of these leads resulted in an exciting storyline.

So we did not understand why the aliens placed their artifacts-monoliths, why we were shown “monkeys” who possessed the murder weapons (show us then the Dark Ages of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance...). A very interesting idea with a rebellious computer ended in the end without any intrigue, predictably. This theme is a hundred times better disclosed in the story “Man according to Plato” by R. Sheckley.

With physics, the authors have a serious problem: the actors could not convey weightlessness, it was funny to watch the attempts of the actress-"stewardess" clumsily walk as if in magnetic shoes, or as the pilot of the ship in zero gravity (!) leaned (!) on the backs of the seats ... Did NASA experts tell you?

So, the film is incredibly boring, has slurred storylines, meaningless dialogue, sometimes accompanied by terrible psychedelic sounds and videos.

Of the advantages - only some scenery and futuristic ideas.

5 out of 10

Original

close
Oleg
09 October 2009
10

Our days. People build houses, launch satellites, the Internet, satellite television into space.

Not too distant. 1969. The first landing of the Apollo 11 spacecraft on the moon.

Here is all the information you need to know before watching this movie. In 1968, Stanley Kubrick created, without exaggeration, more
close

Our days. People build houses, launch satellites, the Internet, satellite television into space.

Not too distant. 1969. The first landing of the Apollo 11 spacecraft on the moon.

Here is all the information you need to know before watching this movie. In 1968, Stanley Kubrick created, without exaggeration, a landmark film for cinema. If not for the odyssey, many science fiction films about the cosmos of our time were a little different, it is unknown that Tarkovsky would have created his Solaris and much more. This is not just a moment in history, it is history itself. History of the development of popular science fiction films.

The film poses many different topics, questions, few answers, but the three main ones are: the emergence of man, man and machine, man and space.

The emergence of man. This is the very first part of the movie. A monkey with a militant appearance beats a large tibia on the skeleton, then the first murder and so on. And all this is accompanied by the presence of a monolith, and absolutely black, and allegedly because of it monkeys suddenly became intelligent. This is another interpretation of where a person came from. But this is one of the most fantastic. It is unlikely that a monolith could fly to prehistoric primates and give them intelligence. It sounds and looks ridiculous. However, this point of view should not be discounted.

Man and machine. Can artificial intelligence know that it is smarter than humans? Could there be a rebellion on the ship itself? It’s always a long topic to discuss, and it all started with this movie. This is where it's most clearly shown. Even in the same terminator, this is expressed more in the militant form, and here everything goes on at the level of the subconscious, and the psychological relationship of a person with a computer. With a minimum of words, everything can be understood.

Man and space. Perhaps the most important part of the film is the last shot. Space, Child, Earth by Richard Strauss Everything looks great. You can watch the whole movie for that moment. A very symbolic moment. You can see that humans are just kids in space, like this kid floating in space. But there are many other moments, just landing on the moon, Jupiter.

In general, I divide all fantastic films into two types. The first is “2001: A Space Odyssey”, “Alien”, “Star Wars” (4-5 episodes), etc. To the second group "Aliens", "Star Wars" (1-3, 6 episodes), etc. The first group is certainly more valuable films, creating the so-called dystopian world, they are more semantic, not focusing on war, shootings, explosions and so on. The complete opposite is the second group. As everyone says, but for me, the films from the first group are much more important, but unfortunately they are no longer being made, or are being made, but in very small quantities.

The main features of the film, in my opinion, is its plot and visualization. I’ve already said a lot about the story, but the most important thing is an open ending. Visualization in this film at the highest level. For 68, it's just a masterpiece in the field. And in general, at the moment, probably the most interesting visual series in this film. A permanent kaleidoscope of flowers, waltzes of spaceships, corridors, and even the most seemingly unremarkable hall, this is the dining room, and it is made with taste.

The main problem with this film is its length. For example, in the last half an hour in the film did not say a word. Towards the end, it starts to strain a little. Watching the transfusions of the flowers of space is interesting, but not for 20 minutes in a row. It's a mockery. Of course, in the late sixties it was a breakthrough, but now to play in silence is no longer relevant.

Of course, when playing in silence, the acting game is appropriate. Practically zero emotions. It's not even normal to single out the main character, whether it's Dave Bowman, or someone else. I don't understand. The film is divided into several parts, so... I only liked the HEL-9000 computer. That's really cool. Although it is clear that he has only one voiceover and an unblinking yellow eye, but it looks so spectacular that there are no words. It is no coincidence that after he was seen by Anthony Hopkins, he was immediately inspired to play the role of Lecturer. It's a real maniac.

And of course, the film has wonderful soundtracks. Kubrick has an amazing ability to successfully combine classical music with his films. In Clockwork Orange, he quite successfully wrote Beethoven’s music into the film. And here, in my opinion, even more successful classic Richard Strauss.

Kubrick makes a lot of completely different films. From a comedy to a horror film, from a science fiction to a film about teenage violence, each of his films is a small (and sometimes not small, as in the case of Clockwork Orange) revolution. In those days, space fiction was almost never filmed (I can’t even understand how he managed to shoot a moon landing, if the real moon landing happened only a year after the release of this film) and this film would be a great inspiration for future directors of this genre, for which he is very grateful.

Original

close
Maksim
09 October 2009
10

Our days. People build houses, launch satellites, the Internet, satellite television into space.

Not too distant. 1969. The first landing of the Apollo 11 spacecraft on the moon.

Here is all the information you need to know before watching this movie. In 1968, Stanley Kubrick created, without exaggeration, more
close

Our days. People build houses, launch satellites, the Internet, satellite television into space.

Not too distant. 1969. The first landing of the Apollo 11 spacecraft on the moon.

Here is all the information you need to know before watching this movie. In 1968, Stanley Kubrick created, without exaggeration, a landmark film for cinema. If not for the odyssey, many science fiction films about the cosmos of our time were a little different, it is unknown that Tarkovsky would have created his Solaris and much more. This is not just a moment in history, it is history itself. History of the development of popular science fiction films.

The film poses many different topics, questions, few answers, but the three main ones are: the emergence of man, man and machine, man and space.

The emergence of man. This is the very first part of the movie. A monkey with a militant appearance beats a large tibia on the skeleton, then the first murder and so on. And all this is accompanied by the presence of a monolith, and absolutely black, and allegedly because of it monkeys suddenly became intelligent. This is another interpretation of where a person came from. But this is one of the most fantastic. It is unlikely that a monolith could fly to prehistoric primates and give them intelligence. It sounds and looks ridiculous. However, this point of view should not be discounted.

Man and machine. Can artificial intelligence know that it is smarter than humans? Could there be a rebellion on the ship itself? It’s always a long topic to discuss, and it all started with this movie. This is where it's most clearly shown. Even in the same terminator, this is expressed more in the militant form, and here everything goes on at the level of the subconscious, and the psychological relationship of a person with a computer. With a minimum of words, everything can be understood.

Man and space. Perhaps the most important part of the film is the last shot. Space, Child, Earth by Richard Strauss Everything looks great. You can watch the whole movie for that moment. A very symbolic moment. You can see that humans are just kids in space, like this kid floating in space. But there are many other moments, just landing on the moon, Jupiter.

In general, I divide all fantastic films into two types. The first is “2001: A Space Odyssey”, “Alien”, “Star Wars” (4-5 episodes), etc. To the second group "Aliens", "Star Wars" (1-3, 6 episodes), etc. The first group is certainly more valuable films, creating the so-called dystopian world, they are more semantic, not focusing on war, shootings, explosions and so on. The complete opposite is the second group. As everyone says, but for me, the films from the first group are much more important, but unfortunately they are no longer being made, or are being made, but in very small quantities.

The main features of the film, in my opinion, is its plot and visualization. I’ve already said a lot about the story, but the most important thing is an open ending. Visualization in this film at the highest level. For 68, it's just a masterpiece in the field. And in general, at the moment, probably the most interesting visual series in this film. A permanent kaleidoscope of flowers, waltzes of spaceships, corridors, and even the most seemingly unremarkable hall, this is the dining room, and it is made with taste.

The main problem with this film is its length. For example, in the last half an hour in the film did not say a word. Towards the end, it starts to strain a little. Watching the transfusions of the flowers of space is interesting, but not for 20 minutes in a row. It's a mockery. Of course, in the late sixties it was a breakthrough, but now to play in silence is no longer relevant.

Of course, when playing in silence, the acting game is appropriate. Practically zero emotions. It's not even normal to single out the main character, whether it's Dave Bowman, or someone else. I don't understand. The film is divided into several parts, so... I only liked the HEL-9000 computer. That's really cool. Although it is clear that he has only one voiceover and an unblinking yellow eye, but it looks so spectacular that there are no words. It is no coincidence that after he was seen by Anthony Hopkins, he was immediately inspired to play the role of Lecturer. It's a real maniac.

And of course, the film has wonderful soundtracks. Kubrick has an amazing ability to successfully combine classical music with his films. In Clockwork Orange, he quite successfully wrote Beethoven’s music into the film. And here, in my opinion, even more successful classic Richard Strauss.

Kubrick makes a lot of completely different films. From a comedy to a horror film, from a science fiction to a film about teenage violence, each of his films is a small (and sometimes not small, as in the case of Clockwork Orange) revolution. In those days, space fiction was almost never filmed (I can’t even understand how he managed to shoot a moon landing, if the real moon landing happened only a year after the release of this film) and this film would be a great inspiration for future directors of this genre, for which he is very grateful.

Original

close
Maksim Efremov
All reviews
Similar films Show Hide
Gardenback, 1977
Gardenback,  1977
Eraserhead
7.23 71752
average of
21411 rates
IMDb7.3 
Country:  USA
Genres:  Fantasy,  Sci-Fi,  Horror,  Drama,  Arthouse
Director:  David Lynch
First time father Henry Spencer tries to survive his industrial environment, his angry girlfriend, and the unbearable screams of his newly born mutant   more First time father Henry Spencer tries to survive his industrial environment, his angry girlfriend, and the unbearable screams of his newly born mutant child. David Lynch arrived on the scene in 1977, almost like a mystical UFO gracing the landscape of LA with its enigmatic radiance. His inaugural work, "Eraserhead" (1977), stood out as a cinematic anomaly, painting a surreal narrative of a young man navigating a dystopian, industrialized America, grappling not only with his tumultuous home life but also contending with an irate girlfriend and a mutant child. close
Akira, 1987
Akira,  1987
7.66 103559
average of
29215 rates
IMDb8.0 
Country:  Japan
Genres:  Anime,  Animation,  Sci-Fi,  Action,  Thriller,  Detective
Director:  Katsuhiro Otomo
A secret military project endangers Neo-Tokyo when it turns a biker gang member into a rampaging psychic psychopath that only two teenagers and a group of psychics can stop.  A secret military project endangers Neo-Tokyo when it turns a biker gang member into a rampaging psychic psychopath that only two teenagers and a group of psychics can stop. close
A Trip to Mars, 1902
A Trip to Mars,  1902
Le Voyage dans la lune
7.73 34077
average of
11747 rates
IMDb8.1 
Country:  France
Genres:  Short,  Sci-Fi,  Fantasy,  Action,  Comedy,  Adventure
Director:  Georges Melies
Professor Barbenfouillis and five of his colleagues from the Academy of Astronomy travel to the Moon aboard a rocket propelled by a giant cannon. Once   more Professor Barbenfouillis and five of his colleagues from the Academy of Astronomy travel to the Moon aboard a rocket propelled by a giant cannon. Once on the lunar surface, the bold explorers face the many perils hidden in the caves of the mysterious planet. close
Dangerous Days, 1982
Dangerous Days,  1982
Blade Runner
7.86 429796
average of
116333 rates
IMDb8.1 
Country:  USA
Genres:  Sci-Fi,  Drama,  Detective,  Action
Director:  Ridley Scott
In the smog-choked dystopian Los Angeles of 2019, blade runner Rick Deckard is called out of retirement to terminate a quartet of replicants who have   more In the smog-choked dystopian Los Angeles of 2019, blade runner Rick Deckard is called out of retirement to terminate a quartet of replicants who have escaped to Earth seeking their creator for a way to extend their short life spans. close
Dr. Strangelov e or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, 1963
Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb,  1963
7.53 236108
average of
52141 rates
IMDb8.3 
Countries:  UK,  USA
Genres:  Comedy,  Sci-Fi,  Thriller
Director:  Stanley Kubrick
After the insane General Jack D. Ripper initiates a nuclear strike on the Soviet Union, a war room full of politicians, generals and a Russian diplomat   more After the insane General Jack D. Ripper initiates a nuclear strike on the Soviet Union, a war room full of politicians, generals and a Russian diplomat all frantically try to stop the nuclear strike. close
All similar movies
trailer Show Hide
No trailer yet
Wrong trailer Ok trailer! Удалить
Search on youtube Search on vk

Recently viewed
Choose movie
Rate the movies you've seen
FILMADVISER © 2019-2025
ABOUT FAQ FEEDBACK
{dur}
If you were registered, you should have seen the full description right here...
{short_descr}  more {descr} close
{rating_name}
{rating_value}
I will watch:
First of all
Secondly
Sometime
{rate_date}

{title}
{src_title}

{stat}
{edit_comment}
{short_descr}
poster
{title}, {year} {serial} 
{user_link}
{src_title}
{expected_rate} {average}
average of
{true_nrates} rates
{?genre
Genres:
 } {genre}
{?country
Countries:
 } {country}
{?films_director
Director:
 } {films_director}
{folders}
{xuser_rate}
{cdate}
{xrate}
{widget} {rec_method} {status} {admin_edit} {review-text} {rlikes}
{feedback_date}

{title}
{src_title}

{stat}
{edit_comment}

{short_descr}
{feedback_date}
{name}

{title}
{src_title}

{feedback_type_verb}: {status_prc}
{nactions_show}
{edit_comment}

{short_descr} {admin_edit}
{cdate}
{xuser_rate}
{rbody}
{uavatar}
{name} {rprox}
{rlikes}
{uavatar}  
{uname}
{ga_header} {rage} {rates_header} {user_nrates}
{is_frend_header} {uavatar}  
{uname}
{ga_header} {rage} {rates_header} {user_nrates}
{xuser_rate}

{cdate}
 
#{NN}
 
{uavatar}
{uname}
{ga_header} {?gpic } {rage} {reviews_header} {lreviews} {rates_header} {user_nrates}{kn_rates} {content_actions_header} {content_actions_count} {activity_header} {user_activity} {rating_header} {user_rating}
{uname} {rate}
{title}, {year} {serial}
{full_src_title}
dir:  {films_director},  {country}
{expected_rate}
{average}
average of
{true_nrates} rates
{expected_rate} {name} {rate} Invite
  Rates Proximity Reviews Rating Visit Friend Content
{has_trailer}   Статус: {status_ind}        +          -  
       +          -                            ?          ×       
{rlikes}
{likes} {dislikes}
{comment}
{likes} {dislikes}
{comment}
{likes} {dislikes}
{comment}
{likes} {dislikes}
{comment}
{likes} {dislikes}
{comment}
A comment is required to dislike The comment must contain at least 50 characters.

meaningless comments will be deleted, and then dislikes will be automatically deleted Informative comment needed

{title}
{xrate}
{title},  {year}
{title}
{title},  {year}
{?review_after_season
written after {review_after_season} season from {last_season}
}
{short_text} more
{text}
{review-source-link}
close
{?review_after_season
written after {review_after_season} season from {last_season}
}
{short_text} more
{text}
{review-source-link}
close
{?review_after_season
written after {review_after_season} season from {last_season}
} {text}
{review-source-link}
{title}{prty}
{title}
{film_role}
{title}
роль:
{film_role}
{title} {film_role}
{add_photo}
Add photo
{user_rate_text}
Rate or add to wish list
{rate}
{srate}
watched
rate it
 Just watched
  Add to folders
{folder} 
{folder} 
   
 Wish
 Exclude
 Don't want
 Watch
 Watch
{ncomments}
{date} {name} → {author_name} "{ytitle}"
{comment}
{replys_count}
{mdate}
{is_answer_to_date} {is_answer_to_subject}
{is_answer_to_text} {is_answer_to_id}
{from}
{to}
{body}{more}
{reply}
{replys_html}
{is_answer_to_text}
{subject}
{body}
{mdate}
{cdate} {subject}
{text}
This is a reply to Answerd Correspondence Reply
{uavatar} was {user_activity}

Spoiler alert!
{text}
{or}{title}
{title}
{title}
{title}
{name}
together with
reset
{title}, {year} {serial}
{user_link} rated at
{user_rate}
{review-text}
{rlikes}
{country}
{genre}
{films_director}
{expected_rate} {average}
average of
{true_nrates} rates
Just watched
Wish
Not interested
{title} {average}
{nobjects}
{title} ({nobjects})
{?created_date создано} {created_date}{?last_addition_date , пополнено } {last_addition_date}