They threw out information with a negative connotation in non-stop mode. I, of course, do not like silent cinema (and also protracted, which in itself is a serious drawback), but when the lines go with high density to each other, without stopping, without respite, not giving an opportunity to comprehend what was said, too. In 20 minutes,
more
They threw out information with a negative connotation in non-stop mode. I, of course, do not like silent cinema (and also protracted, which in itself is a serious drawback), but when the lines go with high density to each other, without stopping, without respite, not giving an opportunity to comprehend what was said, too. In 20 minutes, they said as much and as much as they did, which is not the case in the entire film. There must be certain proportions, rules of making a film (of course, if we are talking about quality). It's like it's automatic. After all, this film is not exclusively for personal consumption. Temperamental, expressive characters, as another argument in favor of the fact that the film is alive. A very quick beginning, without swinging, is a plus (movement), and a minus (not increasing) at the same time. For all the advantages of the situation is as follows: the disadvantages outweigh the pros.
|
