Better than the second, but worse than the first. This is one of the standard formulas: a certain conceptual initial project is removed and turns out to be very successful, its success is immediately riveted with a completely worthless second part, which people will go to look at simply for one name, then they understand that the reserve of trust is already at the plinth and with the third part they are again mobilized, giving something more or less meaningful. The tradition is fully respected here. You can praise that the concept does not stand still and creatures from the microcosm got out in our, explicit and excellent graphic performance, the villain really does something, and does not stick in the plot with a pillow for whipping. The pluses are everything.
Now for the minuses.
“You are allergic to a bee sting, but you were not afraid to climb into the hive, you are so brave!” – with its size, a bee sting will kill it not with allergies, but will pierce through. . .
- Black guys from the tribe, who were a strong mystical element in the first film, seemed more like spirits, in the next two parts stupidly break the comedy and hang out in the house like Harry Bigfoot. Why?
- Everything that the characters did during the film was in vain, because the monsters in the end corny interrupted by the army. You could have done nothing, the result would have been the same.
And finally, there is one very disgusting thing. The boy's parents. Why do authors portray idiot parents? I know this happens in life, but why did you choose these characters? In the West, for some reason, it is customary to depict incomplete split families, parents either divorced or dead, they are often cruel, ugly, stupid, pathetic. In this film, we see the same thing, in a clear and disgusting way. The boy has his father's mind and character younger than him. Why? As I got older, it didn’t bother me as much, as bad parents have far more children than good ones, so it wouldn’t be a shame if the film supported them rather than going off into a fantasy of a perfect family that almost no one has. But the image of a fool father was still deeply unpleasant to me.