Well, I finally got to see this masterpiece (according to the American Film Academy and some other festivals). Admittedly, I experienced some disappointment, since much of the film was secondary, which instilled doubts about the genius of this work, and perhaps my cinematic taste, which increasingly does not coincide with the tastes
more
Well, I finally got to see this masterpiece (according to the American Film Academy and some other festivals). Admittedly, I experienced some disappointment, since much of the film was secondary, which instilled doubts about the genius of this work, and perhaps my cinematic taste, which increasingly does not coincide with the tastes of current connoisseurs. If you take this work very seriously, as hinted by the allegedly romantic, however, quite strongly sexually colored, including tolerant colors line, then claims will arise even more. But some of the lines I simply could not take seriously, so I hope that it was still a parody - and the family of the main villain as from advertising booklets, and Russian spies, one of which turns out to be more human than the others. I was writhing from being completely unnecessary to such a rather detailed display of atrocities. But the film is tolerant of homosexuals, which was unusual for the period shown. A fairy tale that lacked fairy tales because of the details of political-sexual-espionage passions.
|
