I really enjoyed it (except for some details). I sat down to watch with the feeling that I was waiting for thrash and low tests, that there would be no plot or meaning. The cartoon of the game, and even so insignificant, in principle should not turn out to be something good. Suddenly everything turned out relatively well. But to accept
more
I really enjoyed it (except for some details). I sat down to watch with the feeling that I was waiting for thrash and low tests, that there would be no plot or meaning. The cartoon of the game, and even so insignificant, in principle should not turn out to be something good. Suddenly everything turned out relatively well. But to accept this cartoon, you must immediately agree with two things: it is not childish and in general not funny. Jokes about ass, sex, perversion, coping... It's stupid, inappropriate and not fun. If children watch this with their parents, then the feeling of awkwardness between them is ensured. The music is exclusively borrowed, all these songs, which were already 10-30 years old at the time of release, no composition was written specifically for the cartoon. It's like there would be no music at all. For 75 million cartoons, at least one track was ordered. The abilities of birds are frankly ugly, it is impossible to explain them, so the authors did not even try. Physics is the same. That birds cannot fly is one of the central assumptions of the whole scenario. However, the cartoon unexpectedly surprised that it has a plot. According to the game, in which the plot was not at all, the authors managed to competently suck out several topics from the finger: 1. The first third of the cartoon resembles the movie Bad Santa. The hero with the strongest social protest is shown. He is not bad in himself, but because the world around him is ridiculous, he has something to hate. Such a person cannot be cured because he is not the problem. He only reflects in himself what hurts society, but he does not know how to hide it. 2. It is honestly shown that the Western system of psychological training is bullshit. She does not help anyone and has long been the subject of ridicule. 3. Politics. It is obvious that in the struggle of birds and pigs the national conflict of the West and the rest of the world is shown, but the distinction is drawn in another plane. Pigs are not a specific country, they are a collective image of political wrongness. So once the colonists survived the Indians by destroying their heritage, so the Americans first fascinate the world with their shows and then spread bomb democracy, and the Islamic world insists that they are a peaceful religion, continuing to blow up, cut and dictate their laws in those countries that accept them meekly. The authors have tried to make this metaphor harmless, but if you turn on the brain, it reads. The most obvious political image in the cartoon is the Eagle, he looks like the coat of arms of the United States and also like Bush. The image of a once great and now senile country, a symbol of forgotten dormant ideals. He would have to save both, instruct, and instead dreams in the museum of his lost glory, recovers in a clear lake, does not fly and causes laughter from those who previously believed in him. Thus, for the content I put the cartoon score higher than what I expected. But he really lacks his own music and adequate, non-house humor.
|