With some, admittedly, effort I watched the film by Martin Scorsese “The Wolf of Wall Street” and I don’t even know what to say about “liked / disliked”. Well, first of all, the three-hour format doesn't make it easy to watch, especially if it's not a series. Secondly, the action is not always (or rather, very rarely) pleasing to the
more
With some, admittedly, effort I watched the film by Martin Scorsese “The Wolf of Wall Street” and I don’t even know what to say about “liked / disliked”. Well, first of all, the three-hour format doesn't make it easy to watch, especially if it's not a series. Secondly, the action is not always (or rather, very rarely) pleasing to the eye. Thirdly, you involuntarily think, because the film is based on the real fate of a real person, the film is based on his book, and everything that we see there can talk about a sincere story or, conversely, about some exhibitionism. Leonardo DiCaprio is laid out in the role, and we believe that he is this hero, who got out of the poor layers first really on Wall Street, and then founded with his friends his company, very successfully engaged in financial fraud with securities, he is very charismatic in fact, but sometimes his firm resembles a totalitarian sect, only here the mores are just terrible - drugs - different, but the main drug - money, sex, orgies, etc. Here with the showing of the latter there, in my opinion, some overkill, of the entire timekeeping of the picture they occupy the most part, although the way it is all shown there looks like a satirical comedy, there is no “full seriousness” in the form of which one could imagine the work of brokers. It is difficult to determine the genre of the picture - it presents many genres, as, obviously, they were presented in the life of the hero himself.
|
