For many viewers, Garfield became a real symbol of the 2000s. Even those who didn’t have the internet heard about this movie. And it is not surprising, because such an active and almost intelligent domestic cat could not but conquer the hearts of cats. Many aspects of this film are close to ideal. This is a chic soundtrack, and a great acting game, and facial expressions of animal characters. Compared to "Babe" the leap in computer graphics is simply gigantic! Not only the mouths, but also the eyes of animals now express their mood, and some, like the cats Nermal, Arlene and Garfield himself, are created entirely on a computer.
The plot of Garfield is quite simple. This is a story about enmity, which under the influence of conscience passes into friendship. Someone has success, someone has failure, and what movie without a love line? It is always inserted whenever there is any opportunity. In the course of the story, certain questions arise for the puppy, whom the fat and selfish Garfield initially perceives as a competitor: why does Odie not know how to talk, unlike many others? It is clear that it is played by a live dog, but real animals with the help of computer magic somehow open their mouths. Due to the fact that the plot is built on behalf of a pet, many scenes are perceived as a real satire on our everyday life. The fact that lovers look stupid is a real cliché, which, however, disappeared over time. I think... But the fact that megacities are full of rats reminds us of the need for hygiene. At the same time, Garfield is very useful to watch in Russia, where in many cities the issue of homeless animals is still unresolved.
In the Russian version, by the way, Garfield has the voice Oleg Tabakov, and this contributed to the fact that many jokes and phrases from the film went to the people. Moments with throwing off the chair, dancing to rap, and, of course, the scene in the ventilation after the first viewing will never be forgotten. Interestingly, the main female role here is played by Jennifer Love Hewitt, who gained fame thanks to the slasher "I know what you did last summer". It's not often that actors in this category get to show themselves elsewhere. It's hard to say anything about Breckin Meyer. He has an uninteresting role as a good guy, the likes of which are abundant in other films. And here is Stephen Tobolowski - a true master of his craft . In his performance, the main villain turned out to be a kind of evil clown, who, although without makeup, but cruel. And since I mentioned Tabakov, Oleg Kutsenko should also be given credit. No one would have done better than him.
"Garfield" doesn't have some of the uncomfortable or nasty jokes that American family comedies often indulge in. A movie about a big, muscular cat is nice to watch and watch over and over again. Remember that the fate of pets is always in our hands. And each of them deserves the same love.
9 out of 10
So, now I have reached the point of writing a review of the cult film Garfield! At one time, it was one of the favorite films of children.
In the center of the plot is a cat named Garfield, who loves his owner John very much, but one day John’s new favorite dog Odie becomes before them. What will happen next, will they be able to get along?
Honestly, the plot is very funny and initially it was clear that the film will be doomed to success. Still, the combination of cat + humor + food works flawlessly absolutely always and director Peter Hewitt apparently of the same opinion, so I decided to build the film on this idea.
As for the humor here, the jokes are appropriate, funny, I half of the film smiled. Garfield draws the film, his image, the way he dances and speaks, I would give anything for such a pet.
I also liked the idea of the graphical realisation of the film - it's only Garfield, the rest of the animals are real, I don't know how the creators came up with this, but it's a very cool decision! There is some zest in this, and gradually you begin to feel that Garfield is as real as other characters, which also positively affects the immersion in the plot.
Operator work I did not arouse much admiration, it is ordinary. No sharp angles or unexpected camera flights in this film you will not see, all by standard. It’s not bad or good, maybe it was influenced by the year the film was made in 2004, maybe it wasn’t bad at the time.
I’ll be talking about music, I really liked the music! She is so driven, just fits the image of this elusive and resourceful cat! So in this component, the creators did not fall into the dirt face.
On acting, I have nothing to say, all the attention goes to Garfield, and John is more like an extra, in principle, it is also not bad, because the main character is not him. Therefore, screen time dedicated to the owner of Garfield is not enough to appreciate his talent. You will not see any enchanting acting, everything is also at the level, but there is no “wow” effect.
Overall, I want to say that this is a great film to watch with the whole family, it will appeal to both adults and children.
8 out of 10
I wanted to refresh my memories and revisit the good old cartoons of the early 2000s, this time the choice fell on the first part of Garfield.
I can not attribute this cartoon to my favorites, even the plot has been erased from my memory for many years, but still I gave it a high rating. Explain why. The cartoon shows the formation of a cat from a lazy egoist into a brave and courageous friend.
Another important plus is that the plot can be easily transferred to human life – the eldest child is a terrible owner who does not want to share his parents with his younger brother or sister. Alternatively, this can be used to prepare the child for the news of the replenishment in the family.
In addition to the plot, the film is good for other moments. First of all, these are very bright and lively characters of heroes, both people and animals. The kind and indecisive John, the brave Liz, walking on the heads of Happy Chapman. Secondly, I really liked the doll cat, namely the way it was depicted. I wanted to touch him and squeeze him. The question was, why are half of the animals real and the others computer-generated? Why did some people talk and others not? Of the other pluses, I can name sparkling humor, an excellent soundtrack, a harmonious weaving of a love line.
Of the shortcomings, I can only name the excessive selfishness of the main character. Cartoon is good for co-watching, where parents can immediately explain what is wrong with Garfield's behavior, why you shouldn't be so narcissistic. Left alone with the cartoon, children can misinterpret the actions of the cat, even begin to imitate him.
I recommend a cartoon for family viewing with children 6-12 years old. Especially Garfield will appeal to pet lovers.
“We have so much in common.” We love one thing and we love the same thing. Me.
For Garfield it is much easier to record a video, as the emotions after watching were only positive. This movie is a full-day exercise, nothing will spoil your mood after Garfield. You could end this review with 10 of 10, which is a masterpiece. But then, according to the rules of Kinopoisk, the review is unlikely to be moderated. So I want to analyze all aspects of this film.
The description indicates the following genres: cartoon, fantasy, comedy, family and so on. We will evaluate the film by genres of comedy and family. For these genres, the most important acting game, everything depends on their charisma and professionalism. Humor is also very important, not toilet or pseudo-black humor, but humor for everyone. Secondary is the story and soundtrack.
Acting: To say they played well would be the right thing to do. Their emotions were realistic. I believed in their every move and decision, which is very important for the films as a whole. Unfortunately, I cannot write here about the most important thing for me, namely, that the characters are personalities, with their own history, since for comedy charisma is more important than the elaboration of the history of the characters. Charisma was at a high level, both with the people and with Garfield himself. The characters weren’t like Jim Carrey, they were real realistic people, which I really liked. As for the names, they are not very famous, and Breckin Meyer, who played the role of John, generally has an award for the worst male role, as you understand “Golden Raspberry”. Another actress, more or less recognizable is Jennifer Love Hewitt, who played the role of Liz. Others don't even make sense. Despite all this, each of the heroes coped with his role perfectly.
Humor and graphics: Humor is really funny, these phrases Garfield just made me pause to laugh. Humor is very kind, there is no death joke or toilet humor. As for graphics, the only one that was created using a computer is Garfield himself, but you have no idea how realistic it is. For example, when he walks his entire belly shakes in different directions, which simply does not allow the smile to come off his face. In addition, his hair when walking also maneuvers. Honestly, if it were not for these both cute and brazen big cartoon eyes, Garfield would be impossible to distinguish from a real cat. The graphics are just at the highest level. Alec Hammond, Suttirat Ann Larlarb, Gary Fettis and Marie France, as well as Peter E. Berger, along with Michael A. Stevenson, coped perfectly.
Plot and soundtrack: Here we are told about John and his beloved pet Garfield, whom he has already spoiled to an impossible degree. One day they go to a veterinary hospital, and their lives change dramatically and the adventures of my beloved Garfield begin. From myself, I want to say that the plot is very interesting, it is not mediocre, which is characteristic of comedies. Everything has a logical chain and structure, which adds more points to the film. There are no sharp plot twists, the plot is full of ticks, but again this does not affect the plot and general impressions. The ending is as predictable, but I can't afford to complain about it. As for soundtrack: it is, but the impact is almost no, just a pleasant melody for the ears, sometimes you even forget that it is.
So Garfield is one of the best comedy movies I've seen. I want to talk about Garfield separately. I’ve never liked cats, but after watching this movie, I bought an Exot cat first because Garfield was the prototype of the breed. Garfield was like a family member, like I'd known him for a long time. Garfield does both good and bad things, but during bad things, you don’t get a negative attitude towards him, he just gets inside you. A separate story is when his conscience is tormented, it's just laughing to death. Just listen to this phrase Garfield used to say to John, “We have so much in common.” We love the same thing. But how do you treat him badly after that? And the way he dances, it's just horror, in the good sense of the word. While watching, I never got a smile off my face. I’ve watched Garfield 3 or 4 times and it’s always different. The film teaches you to love your pets and never kick them out of the house. Just think about the $125,434,945 figure, that’s how much the movie paid off, what else can we talk about? I recommend a mandatory viewing, preferably with a family with warm tea in their hands. Only 10 out of 10, bravo to Peter Hewitt, he proved himself a good director again.
10 out of 10
At zero, computer graphics was affordable enough to create feature films with the main characters entirely created on a computer. We can say that there was a peculiar trend for such films, started in 2000 with "The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle" and almost completely disappeared with "Smurfs 2" in 2013. We ended up with a number of films mostly of questionable quality.
The fact that there is almost no such thing now is more a cause for joy. But it just so happens that I grew up during the heyday of such fakes and remember them mainly with love. Let them not deserve it. One of these tapes, Garfield, was my first Blu-ray purchase. Even before I had the opportunity to play these discs.
I knew a little about Garfield before I first saw it. I came across original comics printed in "Class Magazine." However, in a dubious translation, in which the publishers themselves were not sure. Seriously, sometimes they could print the same strip, but with completely different lyrics. Plus a couple of times on TV came across an animated series about him. But for some reason, I didn't stay on it for more than a couple of minutes.
I really liked the movie and watched it regularly. There was something about him, about his jokes, his choice of music, his animation, that was always catching me. At one time, a friend and I painted board games based on films, and Garfield was one of the few who received such an incarnation. Creating that simple walk with references to the actions of the picture was wildly fun. I don't even mind taking a piece of paper and making it again. I may not be a child anymore, but markers remain.
After all these years, my opinion of her changed. But oddly enough, not so much. It has changed because of the original view. The double stuck in my head powerfully, knocking it out was difficult. Moreover, the change of voice of the main character from Oleg Tabakov to Bill Murray went smoothly. The moment Garfield, with Elvis Presley’s hairstyle, parodies a pop icon, he does change his voice. And Tabakov did not even try, which made the whole scene meaningless.
It is clear that not all word games can be adequately translated. And when Garfield lists the brands of diners, it is reasonable to replace them with more famous Russian viewers. However, it is often difficult to understand why a particular line was not translated, but bluntly changed to something else. The authors of the dubbing decided that their version is funnier? If so, I must admit that sometimes I agree with them. Sometimes.
But the biggest surprise was the change in the villain’s voice. Steven Tobolowski ("Remember") still beautifully plays the cartoon TV presenter with the megalomaniac Happy Chapman. But how much this image won with the voice of Oleg Kutsenko! And so... well, it became pale.
As for the film itself, one thing is important to understand. Garfield 2004 isn’t really a family movie, it’s more of a children’s movie. It's childish logic, childish jokes and childish morality. The original comics weren’t particularly intelligent, but they can definitely be enjoyed at any age. Here the audience is more narrow.
Here is Garfield, a complacent fool, during the film changes to a friendlier through a series of gags and ridiculous circumstances associated with the fact that his owner John (Brekin Meyer) because of the sweet-voiced employee of the veterinary clinic Liz (Jennifer Love Hewitt) takes home a dog Odie. There's also an angry TV presenter involved, yes. Correlations with the original source are surprisingly small, and most of them are associated with explicit references to phrases and signs like “I hate Mondays” and love of lasagne.
With the general simplicity and naivety, there are quite interesting cinematic techniques in Garfield. From a very young age, I was amazed at how well the authors managed to smoothly move the camera from the room where Garfield was watching the TV show to the very place where the program was filmed through the TV. If the people behind the camera did not care about what is happening, they would hardly bother.
However, sometimes it seems that one of the creators had a fetish on meaninglessly complex relationships, like the domino effect – I counted four times this. The most obvious of these was, of course, when Garfield kicked the ball with anger, leading to global destruction inside the house. Not to mention that the scenes are funny.
One day, for a long time, a melody stuck in my head. I spent a long time trying to understand where she came from. A long time later, it dawned on me – this is from Garfield, when the main character thinks how to stop the train with the villain. Not to say that the few melodies that Christophe Beck wrote for the picture, some special. But within the framework of what is happening, they are very effective and well listened to by themselves.
And in part they resemble the compositions of Scott Bradley, who worked on the original cartoons Tex Avery, about Tom and Jerry and other short films with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. Which, to me, is a great reference point. One could say that it was Garfield that gave me a special interest in film music, for which I am particularly grateful.
Although it is no longer appropriate to watch such films by age, my inner child still rejoices and laughs when watching Garfield. So much so that I can’t say anything against him.
The film tells the story of a fat red lazy cat named Garfield from comic books of previous years, which were warmly received by readers. Throughout his life, Garfield did nothing but eat, sleep and enjoy watching TV with his master. And so would continue his monotonous monotonous, but full of pleasure life, if the owner was not asked to look after a puppy named Odi, whose appearance in the house, where the full owner considered himself only Garfield, was stressful for the latter.
However, the appearance of the puppy affected not only Garfield’s pastime, but also his inner world. Through him, Garfield learned that there was a sense of responsibility that Garfield had never known. In terms of the actor can not note that Brekin Meyer played well, most likely, it was not quite his role, and he looked in this tape stupid. I think if Jim Carrey got the role, he would also be in the shadow of the main actor in this movie, because it was created for him. Jennifer Love Hewitt with his appearance noticeably pleased and thereby brought a highlight to the film. I don’t know the other actors.
The film crew tried to fame, producing a long-awaited feature film about the adventures of the cat Garfield, which was quite worthy of such a film adaptation. It is regrettable to say that I was able to watch this film only after 12 years, but the film has not lost something important over the years, as it touched on eternal themes. In terms of special effects at that time, the animators sweated a lot on the creation of this film, and the positive thing is that they did not shoot a full-fledged cartoon, but created a film with the participation of live actors, and the fully animated model of Garfield did not stand out against their background.
The film is suitable for viewing both adults and children, both in the family circle and in noisy company. This film will allow you to relax and have a good time.
It is definitely worth watching, the time spent will not be sorry.
Garfield, comedy film. It speaks of a fat, bold, redheaded and slightly brazen cat. Seeing or revisiting the film made me have good memories from childhood. I loved Garfield very much, like it was my own cat. But more on that later, and now a little bit about the story. As I wrote above, the main character of the film is a cat named Garfield. The whole story revolves around him. He does various things, some good things, some not so good things. And his journey was very interesting. The director of the film is Peter Hewitt, and this name hardly says anything to you, but he shot quite good works, and even if not masterpieces of the film industry, but at least strong middle peasants, the same Adventures of Tom Sawyer, or What Happened to Harold Smith, and many others. Not the most unknown movies, right? Before a detailed description, we will arrange the genres in descending order: Comedy, Fantasy, Thriller and Cartoon.
Once upon a time there were John and Garfield. The cat loved to eat and watched TV all day long. John was in love with Liz from high school and loved to visit her. She worked as a veterinarian, and one day he took Garfield to see her again. And something happened at the clinic, and that's where the storyline begins. I think we can finish with the story. But let's focus on the actors, Garfield's master, John. His real name is Brekin Meyer. Before Garfield, he starred in no less good films like Nightmare on Elm Street 6, Ecstasy, Own Man, Kate and Leo, after Garfield: the series House, the series Heroes, the series Companions, and in all parts of the film Robo Chicken and the series of the same name. The second one is Liz, real name Jennifer Love Hewitt. Before Garfield: the series “Knows the World”, the series “Us Five”, and in the movie “Heart eaters”, these are some of the most famous. After: the series “Think Like a Criminal”, the series “Pretty Women in Cleveland”, and in the film “Lost Valentine”. And of course, the man who voiced Garfield, Bill Murray, but I think everyone knows his work. We're moving on.
The film is definitely a standard quality comedy. With a not very chic plot, but still with its interesting endings. With gorgeous acting and very good computer graphics. The way they reproduced Garfield is simply chic, defying explanation. My impressions, very positive, as then I did not regret watching, and now. I especially liked the show, even though it was a comedy. And actually Garfield, we will talk about him below.
More about the schedule and the laziest cat. Garfield, created using computer graphics, can be easily understood by looking at his cartoon eyes. But the way they did it shocked me in a good way. He is very realistic, every step like a real cat, jumping too, even the manners of the cat left, there to rub against something, a very strong love for milk, as it lies on the back. In short, the programmers worked hard. In general, the graphics are very pretty, especially for the 2004 film. All the textures, every hair on Garfield itself, facial features. Fans of graphics will definitely appreciate and will not regret watching.
“Garfield” teaches us that you love your pets, do not let them go far, but do not spoil. A film for all ages. The most important thing can be a friendly family to watch. I advise everyone for a mandatory viewing, but especially for graphic lovers, fans of the genre of Comedy, lovers of cats and cats. You can also, after a hard day’s work, turn on and relax.
In the end, one thing can be said: the film is multipolar. There is humor, and life situation, and a little Thriller, which is the most important thing in moderation. Again, I recommend a mandatory review. You won't regret it.
Garfield is a red, lazy cat, a character in comics and cartoons. He's a hero for all time and it's no wonder he hit the big screen quickly. Unfortunately, the film is not much like the original.
Garfield and his master John live a normal life. The cat does nonsense, walks, sleeps and watches TV. The first problem with the film is Gupfield. It's completely computer-generated, and for 2004 the graphics are terrible. In scenes where he's being held even from a distance, it doesn't look like they're holding anything. Then John takes the cat to the veterinarian Liz, with whom he has been in love since childhood. The second problem is that the characters are different from the original ones. John at the source is a loser, a slut, and Liz is a cynic, she does not care about the opinion of others. Here they are very kind, and in their sympathy for each other do not believe at all. Liz asks John to take his puppy Odie and he agrees. The third problem of the film is the characters of animals that look different. Odi has become a crosshaired dachshund dog, and this emu does not work. Also changed kitten Nermal, who is no longer a kitten.
The actors play pretty well. Bill Murray as Garfield is perfect. The Russian dubbing isn't bad either. The jokes are predictable and not funny. There's a lot of placement product that even looks silly, like the Pepsi logo on a toy railroad billboard. Who needs it there?
In the end, I do not recommend watching this movie. It has little to do with the original source. The humor here is different, the characters are different from the original not in appearance, not in character.
In general, I never understood why such films as Alvin and the Chipmunks, Garfield 1-2, Stewart Little have such low ratings. “Alvin and the Chipmunks” is just the ideal of entertainment (although 2-3 parts lost almost all the advantages of the original), “Stuart Little” is a very cute film, with a magnificent ending, “The Adventures of Paddington” is a talented, exciting, great family film. But there are also bad films of this genre, such as Scooby-Doo 1-2, which is also boring, and I can’t help but note just terrible acting, and Yogi Bear is too flat and boring. Now we will talk about Garfield.
The main advantage of Garfield is its originality. This fat and unbred cat is just chic! I just can't help but like him! He pulls the whole movie to the top! It’s probably the only plus of the movie, but like I said, one fat cat can make the whole movie, it’s so cool! One of the most original characters in the movie is definitely.
Still, the plot is also quite interesting. John is Garfield’s master, babysitting him all day long, and Garfield’s life becomes paradise. But John gets a puppy, Odie, and he becomes John's new favorite. Garfield naturally hates Odie for it, he wants this puppy gone forever. And suddenly someone kidnaps Odie, of course, Garfield immediately rejoiced, and if you want to know what will happen next, watch the movie!
For 2004, Garfield's animation was great.
After all, I take it back that the Garfield Cat is the only plus. Whatever they say, Garfield is a great movie. For me personally, the main thing in the film is that it looks with pleasure, so that it fills me with positive emotions. And Garfield is doing this very well. It is a must-see for everyone except the most inflated and picky critics.
According to the famous American comics about a funny, lazy, red cat in 2004, a whole film was shot. The movie turned out to be an easy and funny, family comedy. This film looks with a smile, and the red cat has many crown, memorable phrases and various jokes.
In this film with a children's fairytale atmosphere, we see the life of a red cat named Garfield. He lives with his good, young master. Garfield likes to eat well, sleep well, and eat again. He's happy and bigger and doesn't want to dream about anything. Harmony of the ideal life of Garfield collapses when his owner brings a puppy into the house, and this funny story begins.
Garfield's character is very funny and funny. His voiceover perfectly picked actor Bill Murray. Garfield has a sharp tongue, and you won't miss him. We see his funny story and many, many jokes and awkward situations. This movie looks like a smile. Of course, it will be more to the taste of the youngest viewers. I think children will appreciate this easy and cute movie. In addition to the animated hero Garfield in the film play Brekin Meyer and Jennifer Love Hitt.
Garfield is an American, family, unpretentious comedy. The whole comic story revolves exclusively on a funny and insolent, but charming cat. Comedy is far from a masterpiece, but I recommend watching it for young viewers.
6 out of 10
Red cat Garfield is very popular in his homeland in the United States. Toys, books, socks and more with his image are still successfully sold at high speed, however, it happens with other promoted branded animated characters. Fat selfish cat hero comics, and for his anniversary it was decided to give the world a full-length film.
Peter Hewitt was invited to the role of director, who worked on the cult series “Tales from the Crypt” and filmed the continuation of adventures, no less cult, Bill and Tedd. In the film, we are introduced to Garfield and his owner John (Brekin Meyer), for the role of which, it is rumored, Jim Carrie himself auditioned. They live a measured life of bachelors, but John has been in love with a girl since childhood, now a woman veterinarian, Liz (Jennifer Love Hewitt). Once Liz asks John to take care of his puppy Odie, John sees it as an important step in their relationship. But with the help of Garfield’s cat, the puppy is kidnapped. Friends come to the rescue.
I'll tell you right away, I never liked this cat, I couldn't find a place for him in my heart. When I first watched it in 2004, I liked it, and 10 years later I watched it on Blue Ray, and it seemed completely boring and uninteresting. I bought the film only because of the respected Bill Murray, who voices Garfield and, by the way, who plays best in this film. He even played the role of misanthrope, which is famous for Murray, the creators guessed 100%. Oleg Tabakov has his own cat, and we remember and love him.
I think it’s one of the best movies that involves talking animals.
For me, Garfield is a movie that can be watched 5, 10 and 20 times. It is not boring, and at each view remains the same fun and funny.
Garfield is a unique cat! : He runs and jumps, and sings songs, and does bad things, and does good deeds, and saves others, Garfield can do everything.
The film is suitable for viewing both children and adults. In general, the film is worthy of its genre and justifies the money spent.
Since at the time of release it was the best film of its genre, I rate it with the highest score.
10 out of 10
The film from the category ' I watched, yawned, so that until death I did not return to viewing'. and my attitude to the film was obviously neutral. Comedies have nothing to give me, unless it's Home Alone or at least Crawling from gangsters, a classic gone. With the advent of computer effects, Americans have forgotten how to make movies forever.
Garfield in me did not arouse any sympathy or aesthetic feeling, but the painting would have been more beautiful. The main characters are very suitable in appearance to the film, and the villain is more suitable for the circus. In the film, there are strangely few human heroes, only four. And the script liquid and some unfinished. They were all just going to do something. We were going to start a relationship, crawl to the building, leave. And the climax was going to happen, too. The whole movie is about waiting for the movie, but the climax never happened, although maybe it was somewhere. Things could be cooler, the plot could be brighter, the villainous side could be stronger. There's not enough stock, bad things. A story at the level of light series where actors play jokes.
Because of the fluidity of the script and maybe especially for children, there are no villains in this film at all - there is only a neutral misunderstanding between those and those characters who have never even crossed paths to fill each other's faces. Everything happened between mute animals in their micro-world.
It's a movie for kids and kids. I’m not going to insist that the movie is bad, the movie is bad. But there is nothing to say about it.
There’s so much that I wouldn’t even watch this movie. And it was not the desire to watch that movie.
For me, Garfield is one of the best animal movies about cats. Funny to the point of colic, but it also makes sense.
I am not a master of computer effects, but I can see their ordinaryity. Actors (except for the voice of the cat) involved average, there was no opportunity Jennifer Love Hewitt to prove themselves. What about the fat redhead... It is a pity that the incomparable Bill Murray did not appear in the role of a cameo! I'm sure that would give the film a plus from film critics.
The plot for an animal movie is worn, but the script and dynamics are very fun. And the jokes of simple, clear was full, without vulgarities. Great family movie.
I love cats, what could be better than this purring miracle? Of course, everyone has his own, someone likes cats more, someone loves dogs.. not a problem, in this film there are cats, dogs, and even mice. In addition, all animals are good and positive, leave no room for sadness.
Garfield is a person, he and a cat are unusual to call. Such a cat-man, not cat-wise intelligent, arrogant, fat and lazy idler, immensely loving himself. But how he dances, how he sings, what he does and invents! And only dare to offend someone close to him - it does not seem much.
The cinema is very kind and cheerful, makes you laugh, smile and dance in the soul of the samba. The atmosphere is wonderful, but the plot ... still has not been finalized, there is no content that would capture and amuse to the point of mind. I was always missing something! Everything is too superficial and flat.
I am very sympathetic to the actress Jennifer Love Hewitt. “Fall in love” with her after watching the movie “Heart eaters”. Incredibly charismatic and sexy girl with a stunning figure, charming smile and acting talent, worthy of any admiration. In the film, she is incredibly cute and smiling, gives light and warmth, like the film itself.
Easy funny movie with an amazing cat, to lift the mood - it is. Look, the great Garfield won't let you down. He, of course, the highest score, well, the film as a whole:
7 out of 10