Do not be deceived - "A very scary movie 3" repeats the shoals of the previous parts, but in comparison with them there were certain improvements. As the third part grew budget, the creators hoped to reach a wider audience, so the parody became less vile and more ridiculous. Finally. This is generally a unique case, since the advantages of the third part directly follow from the fact that the main parodied films are among those that do not want to praise.
Two main story arcs refer to the film "Signs" and the American remake of "The Call." Since both tapes have something to blame, watching their parody is a pleasure! Here and the reaction of the characters is fun, and the overall tone of the narrative is also good. As you can guess, the franchise is becoming more fantastic, although elements of horror still prevail. Acting game for its category in principle tolerable, there are even moments in which there is empathy for the main characters.
And all nothing, but ... again on the audience brought down the age-old problem of American comedies - "Sort humor". Fortunately, it is less here than in the previous parts, but there it is. Those viewers who will watch this movie during meals or with their parents will not be satisfied. In addition, in the third part, there is an excess of some unreality of what is happening. Not in the sense that ghosts and aliens do not really exist, but in the fact that parodied elements lie in wait for characters literally at every corner. As a result, the viewer gets tired from the very beginning. After all, jokes (which this time can be called jokes) should not be repeated. Although the punches of the main character with his forehead on the chandelier are fun, I admit this.
In general, the third part is in every sense more decent than the previous two, but it is still a bad movie. It is not possible to jump to the middle man.
You can immediately see a different handwriting compared to the previous two parts.
This episode of the film was given to us by another director (David Zucker), another cameraman (Mark Irvine), who, by the way, gave our world Dumb and Dumber, Tales from the Crypt, Scream and many other chic films. The old team faithfully remained the Wayans brothers, but not in such an important place, devoted Anna Faris and a couple of actors from the first parts.
But the humor, the script, and the makeup are on a completely different level. It feels like movies are growing with the audience. The apogee of vulgarity and primitive humor is passed, although there are vulgar jokes, but not at the same level as in the first two parts.
There is a different style of storytelling, and a different style of shooting, more secondary characters who are very adorning the picture (for example, the characters of Anthony Anderson and Kevin Hart, or the unique US President Leslie Nielsen).
So for those who find the humor of the first two parts unworthy of their attention, the third part is better. But there are moments of immoral humor, so do not count on jokes that are only worthy of the monastery.
10 out of 10
I remember the first part, it was so mean that the whole company laughed to tears. The sequel turned out to be even funnier, there were a lot of parodies and much less humor below the belt (although he was also happy, when watching this franchise, morality and prudishness are silent in order not to spoil the high). Surprisingly, the second part is considered a failure. The third one turned out to be frankly not so humorous, sometimes because it was stupid, so the rating was not very high. But enough time passed, revised, laughed from the heart and realized that no one else will remove, the parody genre is at the bottom.
In this series, mainly two pictures are laughed at: “The Call” and “The Signs”. Also plotted are "8 Mile", "The Matrix" and the signature stupidity of Cindy Campbell. Separately note “8 Mile”, because not only that I really wanted to revise the original, so the parody turned out to be very humorous.
The only drawback is that there is not so much film material involved, so you could work on the script more carefully, or the action sometimes sagged. The really funny moments were accompanied by empty chatter that in the parody heat of the crime. But thanks to the rich casting, even sagging moments smile just by the presence in the frame of a talented comedian.
I will recommend the film for viewing, it is worthy of your attention and even revision, the mood raises despite some of its incompetence, tries to be moderately stupid (not always comes out), but the desire to make you laugh bribes and makes you close your eyes to any shortcomings.
(About the 32nd minute of the film)
A very scary movie 3
I understand everyone who praises movies. Seriously! Not to say that the film is insanely funny, but it is funny, honest. My attitude towards Zucker is more positive than negative. Still, behind his shoulders was "Aeroplane", "Naked Gun", "Rightless People", etc. Classic!
But, hand on heart, the first two parts (from the Wayans brothers) were much cooler than his triquel. I begin to remember my emotions, the first picture made me lie on the floor with laughter. The sequel is understandably inferior to the original, but there was a tantrum, one Marlon could knock the ground from under his feet. Yeah, with your smacking nonsense.
So if you choose, I will naturally be on the side of the Wayans brothers. They're not in the triquel, unfortunately. It's a loss of gigantic proportions. Yeah, Zucker was trying to compensate the brothers. Who? Mr. Kevin Hart, who is crooked along with Anthony Anderson. But you do realize that Melky and Ray (with his blue jokes) cannot be replaced, another level.
Anna Faris is now a blonde (I don’t know, I love her more blonde). And old Regina Hall. So they're trying to cheer us up. Sometimes it’s good (a fight with a girl from the movie Call, for example), sometimes it’s kind of boring, guys. Why are they falling all the time? It's hot.
Regarding Leslie Nielsen (Zucker naturally brought in Leslie, his favorite actor), this is a veteran, no complaints. The claim is specific to Zucker, as Nielsen is very few. 5-10 minutes, nightmare. Charlie Sheen's been given a lot more time, the guy's trying to shake the old days, I'm always happy to see him. That’s just climb to the level of Topper Harley (yes, his own) from “Hotheads” – he can no longer.
Subjectively, the triquel remained the same film that seemed to like, but to review especially and does not pull. In any case, it will still be better than the parody from Friedberg and Zellzer. One look. Favorite parody in the movie? It's "The Call." Pass the note to Cody - 7 days, ahaha.
P.S.
Who thought of inviting Pamela Anderson? It turns out that she is able to mock herself, pleased...
Journalist Cindy Campbell is gripped by the desire to make a scandalous report about some world conspiracy and open the most secret materials! And then her nephew draws strange pictures and talks about the scary girl that only he sees, Sidney begins his investigation. In addition, aliens fly to Earth that threaten humanity.
The film pleases with an abundance of famous actors is primarily Simon Cowell the famous judge on music shows, Pamela Anderson and Denise Richards are real beauties, Leslie Nielsen and Charlie Sheen, although they played the role of stupid characters but it was still fun. Anna Faris is still sweet and pretty. The film, like the previous parts, is filled with vulgar humor, which in this part I thought was not funny and not funny, although the parody of films was performed quite plausibly and easily recognizable Call, Signs and the Matrix, in the end I felt like an average film with flat humor.
Revisited all parts of this quite successful parody of well-known horror films called “A Very Scary Movie”. And I can say without a doubt that this part is the best. The best not only in terms of the script and a good selection of parodied films, but also in terms of the actors.
If in the first two parts it was funny, but rather monotonous, then here we can see a more vivid development of the plot. That’s why it was in this part that I completely immersed myself in the film and did not get distracted. I don't understand anyone who wasn't funny. After all, it is in “Scarious Movie 3” that the black humor is the most. There are almost no stupid jokes that would cause a negative attitude towards the film.
“A Very Scary Movie” is a great parody, a comedy that must be seen by all fans of these genres. The third part is just one IZ, but it most accurately fits into my concept of “horror parody”. Well, those who watched the horror films parodied here will definitely not be disappointed. The parodies here are beautiful.
I also have a piece of advice for anyone who is afraid to watch horror movies: if you are afraid to watch horror movies directly, watch them through Scary Movie. Looks like you're watching a horror movie, but it's funny and not scary. This is a great way to get acquainted with legendary horror films.
Sometimes it is surprising that the sequel is filmed with such stories that are simply not stored in memory and frankly annoying, while there is no hint of a continuation, but in this case everything turned out to be better than it seemed. The third part is undoubtedly superior to its predecessors. It is moderately sleek, quite funny and loyal, the insertion with the American president is especially fun - makes you think about how they imagined him themselves. It was a great show, actually. The eternal memory of Leslie Nielsen, who brilliantly played the president, was the best parody ever seen.
And despite the fact that on the screens again appears Anna Faris Everything happened quite normally. Of course, her character once again proved the saying that blondes are stupid, but this time she seems to show what she is capable of and play a little better than the film deserves. It was funny, sometimes literally to tears and fun to watch. So the negative feelings never came and I was happy to see them. Still not the best parody, but pretty funny.
I don’t want to mention the characters who died in the previous parts and then came back. It became so commonplace that it began to react more calmly. Cindy’s friend even likes her every new comeback – quite a funny person who brings a little color to the film. Yes, and plays quite normal for such a movie, there is something to see.
The third part is the best and I don’t think that will ever change. It turned out not wonderful, but good. Almost without ridiculous jokes, stupidity of the main characters and ridiculous parodies. You can even say that the parody of “The Call” was even better than it seemed. It was a little scary, but it was worth hearing jokes and all the fear went away and uncontrollable laughter came in its place. Of course, in the film, as in the previous parts, there was racism, ridiculous dialogue, but everything seemed not so terrible, and in fact it was fun.
6 out of 10
So far the best of the parts. Smooth but tolerant, funny, funny and the actors did quite well. They did their best to be honest. The rating above does not pull and will never pull, but the opinion about the film has slightly changed. If before I thought it meaningless, now at least laughed a little, lifting the mood.
“Very Scary Movie 3” is another unscrupulous and hilarious comedy parodying such acclaimed and famous films as “The Call”, “The Matrix: Reboot” and “The Signs”. This comedy is all imbued with black humor and vulgarity. The movie was easy and funny, and from some scenes I could not help laughing.
We see Cindy Campbell again. She dreams of a scandalous report, and soon finds herself in a series of various, mystical, comic moments: seeing the tape, everyone dies at the hands of the girl from the well, and the world is threatened by aliens leaving mysterious signs on the field.
Anna Faris is really a great comedian, and in this film she played as always funny and very funny. Comic and ridiculous moments she always hilariously funny emotionally transfers to the screen. Leslie Nielsen will always be on my list, some of the best comedians, and it was nice to see him in this comedy. I don't like Simon Rex very much, but he always plays the role of stupid jerks. My favorite scene was again the very first one that featured Jenny McCarthy and Pamela Anderson. It was very, very funny! Well, Regina Hall, as always, played the funniest, and now she can make anyone laugh to tears. In a small role it was nice to see Denise Richards, she is a beautiful woman. This comedy is really funny. For me, it’s no better than the first, but better than the second part of Scary Movie. Parody famous films in this comedy is really funny, and this film is ideal for watching in the evening a large and noisy company of friends.
Remember that tape?
- Where you fucked on the boat? And he's like, Poopsy, I'm coming, and she's... Did you see how he was?
- No, not that tape.
Once I had a different attitude to the films of the franchise “Scary Movie” (hereinafter: “USC”). I laughed when I saw them and thought they were cults. Now I am sceptical of the USC. The films of the franchise, albeit expensive, but frankly stupid in content and worthless films, with which you can laugh only if you are still young and with the wind in your head. Nevertheless, the method of constructing parodies presented in the USC became popular after the success of the original film, and therefore a great many different quality Z-movies - from passable to frankly incomprehensible - still annually "decorate" the screens of cinemas.
Plus the triquel - in its greater meaning, unlike the second part. If the sequel "USC" was a kind of compilation of parodied scenes from a variety of famous films, which somehow combined into a single tape by the presence of any main storyline, the third part, minus a number of torn scenes (which in theory should laugh wildly, crawling under the table), can be considered as a whole parody picture. At the same time, without violating the traditions of the franchise, the USC triquel continues to ridicule all popular films, to which the authors only got their hands.
I have a very negative attitude to such an exaggerated perversion of original ideas by someone else. Instead of an accurate and accurate joke, the authors of “USC” from film to film suggest bringing something known to an extreme degree of absurdity. But in general, you can watch the triquel once and even get some satisfaction from viewing.
The verdict. Still goofy, but in comparison with the sequel, a watchable and meaningful part of the famous parody franchise.
6 out of 10
I can definitely say that the third part does not compare with the first two. The director changed, which led to a change in the atmosphere. In this part, you will not see a huge amount of black humor, OK & #39; Beat' it is unlikely that the maximum I got from this film - some pretty funny moments that caused a good-natured smile.
The basis for the parody of David Zucker chose the American version of the film ' Call' however, sometimes in the plot are weaved parodies on films such as ' Lord of the Rings', ' The Matrix' and 'Star Trek'. The directorial merit is that it was possible to harmoniously interweave the plots of absolutely different films and lead everything to one quite tolerable plot. It would seem that everything is fine, but why did I make my review ' red'? First of all, because the purpose of a parody is to make you laugh until you fall at the stupidity of the film (and the original as well). Neither the director nor the acting group managed to cope with this task. The film was serious, but not funny at all.
A separate plus put Pamela Anderson, who is not afraid of ridicule, and Leslie Nielson, who played the role of President. It was something. Overall, I didn’t like the film.
The boys died for their country!
Send flowers to their chicks and whores.
President Leslie Nielsen
I have a dream boy! To have a dream!
"A Very Scary Movie - 3"
The people I talk to have very different tastes in movies, and it’s perfectly normal, as in any relationship, to adapt to them. You can’t say your favorite movie sucks because it sucks. A series of parody films is a very scary movie, very, very, very, very, loves one of those people with whom I communicate quite often. And for him it is not just a comedy, but a comedy, a real masterpiece of the genre. I saw the first movie, but it was released in 2000. But since then my tastes have confidently stepped in the opposite direction from this genre. And what happened next, how events developed in the sequels, I do not know. But one fine Saturday night, I had to accept a bet, the condition of which was to evaluate the merits of the best film in the world, according to my opponent. It's a way to appreciate what he likes. The third film of the series was chosen as the goal.
The plot itself does not make sense, it is just a set of scenes in which famous films are played. Among them: Signs, 8 miles, bell, matrix, etc. And I'll start with the pluses. The fact is that the genre of parody, a thing that is quite easy to implement on the screen. After all, you don’t have to invent anything, you take famous scenes and reshoot them, but it’s funny. The main thing is to fasten all these scenes into a single piece. And here the skill of the director is decisive.
Some episodes are very well shot, they are memorable, and you want to review and quote them. Like the funny 8-mile parody, the scene at the TV studio where Cindy says people aren't interested, the scene where Brenda plays Cindy, allegedly dying. In general, there is something to remember and not take it away.
But still, for all the fun, it seemed to me that the director could not turn the individual scenes of parody into a parody film. So the funny beginning, which inspired me and led me to the idea that the review would be positive, quickly slid into self-repeats (whose child is forgotten and then hit by a car). I was tired of these repetitions, and in the second part I smiled a few times. This is doubly surprising, because the director was David Zucker, the author of Airplane, Naked Gun, but apparently age makes itself felt. Zucker has ceased to feel comedy, that is, he is trying to grasp the modernity, but David you better shoot as before, you do not need to chase new trends of humor.
Another thing that embarrassed me was the so-called toilet humor, all the vomit, farts, stepping into shit, the funeral scene and other unsightly details. By the way, the episode with the cassette, when a certain man is defecating directly into the TV screen, clearly fell to the taste of the creators of the “best films”. Some would say they're mocking African-American humor. But it was unpleasant to me, regardless of what they put into it, just wanted to squander this moment.
Acting work is of high quality. Anna Faris is cute, as if she was born to play this role. The way she portrays a fool is top aerobatics, if I happen to make a rating of the best movie fools in the history of cinema, Anna will take an honorable second place. First place was won by Marilyn Monroe and this is not disputed. Literally in one scene, she can seriously talk about what she needs a relationship and immediately with a direct, absolutely imbitile face, listen to George perform white rap. Anna Faris is a key character and the main advantage of the series.
Simon George as Uncle George is not bad, especially in the scene of rap reading in school, although which one is a rapper, he does not even have a normal cepura.
I liked Uncle George's friend, especially the little one. And the scene with the showdown between the brothers, it was funny.
Charlie Sheen didn't like it very much, he's kind of gray, I forgot about him. But he knows how to light up.
It was nice to see George Carlin as the creator of the matrix, just his image, I expected him to say, you are all sick and fuck off.
Leslie Nielsen is typical, but that's the image people demand, so it's all good here. George W. Bush was kicked, patriots are happy.
Okay, what's up? The film is not as bad as it may seem and it is not a curtsey to my friends. Not a bad comedy, which has enough fun moments, but it is best to cut out your favorite episodes and watch them separately. And so all these rivers vomit, jokes about poop, they certainly reduce the impression. No, if that doesn't bother you, then please enjoy the waterfall of humor. But there were parody films that did without it. Charged weapons, for example.
I've had double feelings. On the one hand, some really funny parodies, but on the other, repetitions that tire in combination with jokes below the belt. And of course, a huge disadvantage for the inspiration Kharlamov and his best films. I'd rather go ahead and review it.
- If we promise to come, will you shut up the hare? / i>
The main character - Cindy Campbell is faced with unexplained phenomena. First a strange message in a cornfield of a farmer, then a strange videotape, after watching which a bell rings and a terrible voice says: “You have seven days to live”, and then mysterious aliens, clearly preparing an invasion of Earth. To save herself and her loved ones, the desperate heroine must untie this mysterious “tangle” at all costs and find out what is what.
The main feature of the third part of the famous parody franchise is that the “fathers of parody” took up it. - David Zucker and Pat Proft, and therefore black and extremely vulgar humor is not so much, but this does not mean that the third part is a failure in all articles. On the contrary, old Zucker, thanks to his talent, managed to shoot almost the best part in the series.
The vulgar humour here is noticeably diminished, but everything else is left in place, and even made even more funny than before. Everything is funny here - situations, random moments, dialogue, and most importantly - characters. There are only two old characters here - Cindy and Brand, but there are many new ones. Here you and the boy fortune teller, and the farmer, his brother rapper-loser, the President of the United States (he, by the way, plays Leslie Nielsen – another “surprise” from Zucker), and other important, but rather funny characters. The humor here is healthy, you don’t even have to worry about it.
The screenwriter managed to link several horror films in one film, and he connected them quite successfully, and many ideas here are quite well sustained. The parody of each of these horror films is quite successful and funny - nothing superfluous. By the way, racist humor here became more, but the vulgarity and other “black” humor slightly decreased.
Honestly, I'm even glad Zucker joined the series. He breathed new life into it and made it better. The third part, thanks to many combined ideas and healthy humor, became noticeably better than its previous parts, and judging by the experience of the next parts, it would be better to stop at this film.
Mr. President, you'd better step away from the window.
Am I not wearing pants again? /i>
In a busy working day, there should be time and opportunity to relax. Parody cinema in this sense serves as an outlet for many, but do not forget that even in films that are not burdened with an intellectual basis, there should still be an interesting and original plot and memorable scenes, which in this case, unfortunately, is present to a lesser extent than in the previous films of the series.
The concept of the project remained unchanged - it is an ironic parody of modern horror films. On the one hand, the idea, despite the third serial number in the franchise, remains fresh and original. After all, we used to feel fear when watching horror movies, and now we have the opportunity to laugh at our own weakness. The choice of paintings for ridicule is also quite extensive. Only rare jokes here can be called successful. It seems to me that it is all about the excessive enthusiasm of the authors of the series with jokes below the belt. This film is not meant to be serious, but some moments seem frankly superfluous and even vile. This is the disadvantage of most modern comedies in pursuit, as it seems to the creators, for the audience. Personally, I was genuinely laughing at some points in the film, not just getting a smile, but these scenes were not related to the subject of sex.
By the way, the film parodied not only the famous horror films, which for the attentive viewer turns viewing into a kind of challenge - a rather interesting occupation. The return of familiar actors in the first two parts also benefited the project. In other words, it is a film, as they say, for an amateur.
Do you like parodies? I love them very much. After all, it's art! To feel the line between art and bacchanalia ... is already a gift multiplied by experience. Not every parody catches the viewer. The creators of "A very scary movie" this is so far successful. They will continue to do so until the money catches their eyes. Then the gift will disappear, and talent and experience will not help.
The third part of this crazy franchise takes as a basis such tapes as "Call" (almost everyone has seen it) and "Signs" (I have not seen this already). There are still some shots taken from other films (for example, from the film "Others"), but this is to a lesser extent.
As the parodies with the strange title “Scary Cinema” came out, I noted that the first and second were on about the same level, and the third was already inferior to them. The fact that the third part is quite worthy, I did not immediately admit. It's just less idiocy (in a good way). Humor is healthier. There are fewer “addict” jokes. In some ways, it can even be considered a plus.
Personally, I really liked how the TV streamed, how Cindy was frightened by the hum of the ship’s signal (being at another time and in another place) and also: “What are you going to comb now?” – it’s great! Add to this the guy with a blurry photo, who, it turns out, here he is and Nigerian (I am not a racist, this is for dictionary poignancy) rap with "Kukluxklan". That's a vinaigrette. Dudes liked, building such an algorithm of thinking that I even in my jokes began to borrow this delusional pseudologic (again in a good sense)...
There is no point in listing all the jokes. That's not it. With nostalgia in his heart, he watched Leslie Nielsen, realizing with anguish that this actor would no longer please us with new tapes. But the old ones will live forever. As for Charlie Sheen, this comedy actor is somehow invisible in modern cinema. Having played in a couple of parts “A Very Scary Movie” and “Hot Heads”, he is something not very popular with others.
In short, the film has its place in the series of parody comedies. "A very scary movie" is already a certain ... if not a brand, then a label that finds in advance the viewer's understanding of what it will be and what it is "eat" ...
It was these words that first came to my mind after watching the third part of the franchise “Scary Movie”. I liked all the parts, and I liked them a lot, but I will say that with each part the series has degraded a bit. I immediately liked the first part just crazy. I didn’t like the second and third parts at first. For some reason, I liked the fourth one more than the previous ones, but after reviewing all the parts, I changed my point of view. In fact, the first part was the best – that’s a fact. The second and third are weaker, but different in their own way. The fourth part is too stupid, but it's not bad either. Nevertheless, the entire franchise was and remains the best in the genre of film parody. And now I am looking forward to the release of the fifth part in good quality – I did not go to the movies because it is not in 3D (I only go to theaters for three-dimensional films).
The third part is shot in a completely different style than the first two. The reason is that the first dilogy was shot by the Waynes brothers, and the third and fourth parts were shot by the Zuckers brothers. The first two films were distinguished by overly frank humor, which in the second part even caused some inconvenience when watching, but it was insanely funny. The third and fourth films gleamed more black humor, which at many points mocked to tears, and some moments are a little nasty.
In the third part, everything is different. The actress starring Anna Faris has regained her natural hair color - she's actually blonde, but for the first two parts of Scary Movie, we're used to seeing her brunette. And her heroine behaves very differently, like the heroine Regina Hall, who in the first two parts was mean and cynical, and here became a “good girl”. Sean and Marlon Wains left the project because it wasn’t their brother Keenenen Ivory who filmed it, but someone else. They were replaced by the great comedian Leslie Nielsen, whom we know from his roles in other wonderful parodies. In the third and fourth parts of “A Scary Movie”, he plays a stupid president who has repeatedly made him laugh to the bottom.
In this part, the main storyline parodied the famous mystical horror film “The Call”, which causes many panic fears. I didn’t think it was scary, but I liked it because it was very interesting. The parody of this film could not have been better. So was the parody of the mystic-fiction horror movie "The Signs," which I rated as more creepy. Again, there is a small parody of "The Matrix", as in the first film, and scenes of rap duels brilliantly parody the musical "Eight Mile". There is also a parody of a particular person, Michael Jackson. Apparently, this is a hint that this man was seducing children. The scene parodying Jackson is not gorgeous at all, but wild laughter is provided.
Every part of this franchise has an extended version, and this one has an alternate ending. A few scenes were cut from this part, unlike the second part, which was cut for almost 30 minutes. I looked at the extended versions of all the parts. In the third part, one of the cut scenes is very funny, the rest are not very funny. I watched the alternative ending and laughed.
In general, again, a popular parody comedy that makes the viewer laugh at what he considered creepy and scary. Only this part will appeal more to fans of black humor than frank (although this part did not do without jokes on the topic of sex). Approximately in the same style as this film, a parody of comics is filmed - "Superhero Cinema". I recommend watching a very funny movie.
This tape ... there are such terrible shots!
- Branda, it was New Year's Eve, I've never drunk vodka before.
"A very scary movie 3" - this part included eighteen films, which were made parodies. In the main plot were involved such tapes as, "Call" and "Signs", you can also add the film "8 Mile" to the basis, which the writers and the director devoted a lot of time. Such a parody of horror comedy as "A Very Scary Movie" is immortal. There is nothing stopping new parts from coming out, say once every two or three years, because America releases every year not only stupid horror films that directly ask for a parody, but also many films that have gathered near them not to mention anything.
That is why I call this series of films endless, and it would be good if the new part was released at intervals of two or three years, so that the writers would work well on all the jokes, and create a high-quality parody of this or that film. The third part came out two years after the sequel. Here, the plot revolves not only around Cindy Campbell's friends along with her mad friend Branda, but also about Tom (Charlie Sheen) , CJ (Kevin Hart) . Also in the third part invited such famous people as Pamela Anderson in the role of stupid, silicone blonde in the opening episode, and Leslie Nielsen in the role of President.
I'm not going to kill anymore!
- What's true?
- Nope! I'm kidding!
After the disastrous second film, I can’t understand why it’s called that, the sequels were requested by the master of comedy films, director David Zucker. I fully agree that the third part turned out to be much more interesting in terms of the storyline than the second, but the jokes remained the same, but only strangely, I did not notice a large amount of vulgarity here, the jokes were moderately decent, but as before remained insanely rusty. David Zucker decided to divide the entire film, and so he created two plots that overlap, but remain individuals.
In the parody of the film “The Call”, played by the same Sydney and the same Brand, in the parody of “The Signs”, Tom and CJ, all these characters will intersect from time to time, and the final merge of two parodies will carry meaning and interest. As in previous films, there was a lot of humor, and unforgettable, truly funny parodies on various films, in general, the movie turned out to be very exciting. To sum up, watching movies that you know well is really fun, at least to me, so I thank David Zucker and the writers for such a brilliant sequel.
Cindy, the news has begun.
Cindy, the TV streamed...
After watching the first two parts of the famous parody franchise “Scary Movie” I had no doubt that if there was a third part, it will certainly be funnier than its predecessors, but the shamelessness and vulgarity will also be more. But I never thought that despite the change of director and the PG-13 rating, the film would be funnier and better overall than the previous parts. So let's talk about the movie.
Plot
Cindy Campbell, after graduating from college, became a journalist and now works for one of the TV channels. This time, however, she faces danger. After the mysterious death of her friend Brenda, Cindy takes on the investigation of a mysterious videotape whose curse kills seven days after watching it. Without hesitating to find a clue, Cindy watches the ill-fated film, and she needs to save her life and understand how the film is connected to the mysterious signs appearing in the corn field of one farmer.
Director
Of course, it was unusual to watch the film after Keenenen Ivory Wayans's replacement by David Zucker. If the previous parts were imbued with lust, rudeness and shamelessness, then this part is more acceptable to the general audience. However, do not think that the film is a complete lack of vulgarity, because it is partly present. In terms of parody, Zucker shot “A Very Scary Movie” brilliantly. Scenes parodying various films, looked not just funny, and they have a certain meaning. Of course, it was not a philosophical sense. Just the director thus emphasized the main shortcomings of those films that were parodied in this. So, for example, I liked the episode with “death”. Brands in which the girl from the well climbed out of the TV screen, and Brenda fought with her later.
Result
“Very Scary Movie 3” can be deservedly called a classic of film parody. In this film, in addition to funny scenes, you can see many different methods used in comedies, including parodies.
10 out of 10
Hi, I want to say everything I think about parodies, so I wrote three reviews about them, and now I'm writing a fourth. In fact, at first it was planned that my review would be negative, but after I saw the film, then I read a couple of reviews, and finally realized that the movie is really good. There's nothing to make fun of. I can only think of a couple of funniest moments, I remember the movie and I fall under the table laughing. Yeah, yeah. I'm lying under the table and typing with one hand. Seriously, it's just very funny. Remember the beginning, the end and the middle. A 21st century masterpiece. The best parody of my life, I don't know what to complain about.
The actors played great. Serious idiots and idiots. Aliens have respect. Just like the kids. And especially the parody of "The Matrix," "Don't worry about the vase, oh, I didn't notice ..." Bach ... for this one. The guys seriously ridiculed serious films, and I like it.
The jokes are more or less decent, I've heard worse. You can even watch in the company of intelligent people. Music isn't bad either. There is nothing else I can say, there is one (that is, two) word in the tongue. Very good parody (Damn, it makes three). You have to watch it all.
Scary Movie 3 is probably my favorite part of this franchise. Compared to the previous films, I liked it a lot more. Although there are no big differences from the first and second parts of "A Very Scary Kine" here, but still there was something in it that I liked much more.
Like the two previous films in the franchise, Scary Movie 3 had a very harsh and vulgar humour. Going beyond reason, we were shown anything. Elements of "black" humor were present in the previous parts, but here they became even more. But, no matter how twisted, but still watching everything happening on the screen was really funny and fun.
Unlike the previous two parts of Scary Movie, this film was shot by another director. This time it was David Zucker. It didn’t make much of a difference, but it did make a good sequel to the franchise, which was definitely better than the previous two. Well, at least for me.
The main role was again played by Anna Faris. As always, she laughed and laughed pretty well.
Simon Rex, who appeared in Scary Movie for the first time, also looked comical on the screen.
Also remembered Andrew Adamson, Regina Hall, Leslie Nielsen and Charlie Sheen.
Bottom line: well, overall, Scary Movie 3 was fun, funny and funny.