- Mom, I really want to synchronize with AI.
- Where did you get that desire, son?
- Oh, well, I saw the movie Atlas, and they did it so well. Great!
It is this emotional reaction that should be introduced into the consciousness of teenagers after watching the film Atlas. This is what the customers of this product want.
Netflix products are a tool for realizing the globalist ideas voiced by Klaus Schwab in his book The Fourth Industrial Revolution. One of the main ideas of globalists is transhumanism. One of the sub-ideas is the unification of the human brain and artificial intelligence.
Transhumanist ideologues understand that people have natural fears of new ideas and trends. These fears need to be addressed and overcome. It is not enough to say that there is nothing to be afraid of. It won't work. To work with fears, you need to act consistently and carefully.
In the film, this is accomplished through a simple two-way combination - it's not even Overton Window. First, the main character Atlas Shepherd (consonant with the name of American astronaut Alan Shepherd) is afraid of artificial intelligence. This fear comes from the depths of the past - very similar to the archaic fear that the viewer experiences. At this stage there is synchronization with the viewer. Then, in the process of developing the plot, the heroine (and with her the viewer) solves the problem of fear. It turns out that there is nothing wrong with this, and this symbiosis gives a person many advantages. And even gives more, because people, as Atlas says, are so bad, you can't trust them, but you can do a computer. He's so good.
Ideas about love with the computer were also incorporated into the film Her. According to the consciousness of the viewer, combined and serial blows are applied. The work is systematic and conducted methodically.
On the one hand, people are instilled in fear of their own kind, and on the other hand, they are offered the idea of replacing a person with a computer. Cumulative effect in action. It's almost impossible to resist. The key to resistance is awareness. But the tools of mindfulness are being suppressed. This is a cognitive war.
Atlas is a teenage movie. This conclusion can be made by analyzing the depth of the plot and the complexity of the issues raised. The main focus is on the visual component.
Netflix traditionally invites in their films non-standard actors with a “kind” appearance. Apparently, casting is carried out on the basis of quotas, not objective indicators. Such as talent or appearance.
Initially, Netflix refused to invite big actors to its films. It is difficult to say what this was due to: financial nuances, the position of the big actors or the position of the platform itself. But over time, apparently in order to provide more coverage for its products, Netflix began to invite big actors to lead roles. The principles of hiring others remain the same. In Atlas, this leads to the fact that, apart from Jennifer Lopez, all the other actors look "clumsy" (but traditionally for Netflix).
Speaking of Jennifer. For most of the film, she will be in the cockpit of a combat robot (Hi, Green Screen), and communicate with the AI. This is where Lopez’s problems as an actress come into play. The situation will be aggravated by the objective difficulty of “playing” communication with a computer. It is necessary to pull out human emotions somewhere, to show some conflict, and where it is there is unclear. Netflix wants the viewer to get used to the fact that this is possible, but objective reality shows that there are problems with this. Another thing is that globalists believe that they are above reality, and reality is not worth paying attention to. Well, at least the movie Atlas shows that the globalists will not be convincing.
The plot of the film is stupid even considering the fact that it is aimed at a teenage not very demanding audience. Some dialogues and situations raise purely logical questions, not value-ideological ones.
Atlas is a film-like misunderstanding, a manipulative tool of the globalists in their quest to enslave the world. It was so bad it was almost funny.
Science fiction, having flourished, is experiencing a sunset. Is that true? Probably, this genre is eternal and the final result depends on the talent of the director. With Atlas, the situation is twofold. It’s not the worst science fiction movie (after Battlefield Earth), but something about it is endlessly embarrassing. And, of course, the fact is that it was filmed and looked a thousand times.
Atlas works as a military analyst in the Los Angeles of the future. Her specialty is AI terrorism. Yes, robots, as usual, got out of control, and killed a lot of people, and their leader Harlan, who killed his creator and mother of the main character, escaped with a bunch of robots to an unknown planet. 30 years later, the robots reappeared in the person of Harlan Kasky's associate. Atlas learns Harlan’s location from a captive android and goes to a distant planet to catch the criminal. To help her in this will be a squad of rangers and a robotic module under the control of AI Smith.
Immediately I want to note that the film is quite a lot of action, but this is not the most lively part of the film, made without inspiration: just stamped special effects designed to revive the action. There was a scene in the air in the first half of the film. The rest of the film relies on the acting of Lopez and the voice of Gregory James Cohan. There are questions here, too. If Lopez tries, then watching her character for two hours in a row tires, and here comes to the rescue smooth and caring voice of Cohan, voiced artificial intelligence. In the film, you can watch, perhaps, the episodes of communication Atlas with AI, which somehow balance the synthetic action. The heroine Atlas tries to appear cynical and impregnable, although the most risky thing she does is exceed the permissible norm of quad-Americano. Like the villain in the movie, at least strange. When he is hunted, you think Harlan has a small army of soldiers, but in fact it turns out that the whole threat comes from 20 henchmen, with whom one exoskeleton can cope. So there is simply nothing to fear here, and the creators artificially escalate tension, which does not go to the benefit of the film.
The film raises issues of AI-human interaction, but the kind-hearted, childish tone does not allow you to make a serious comment and the film simply has nothing to occupy the viewer, except for the already mentioned special effects and tolerable play of the main character.
Jennifer Lopez has been unlucky lately. She had to cancel a summer concert tour in support of her new album This Is Me. Live. Her documentary, The Greatest Love Story Never Told, did not make a strong impression on the audience. A fresh feature film “Atlas” with her in the lead role turned superficial and does not offer interesting ideas.
Long before the release of “Atlas”, this sci-fi action movie with a convex melodramatic motif, various films talked about the dangers of the spread of artificial intelligence. And Eve: Artificial Intelligence, and From the Machine, and She, and Simone, and the Sphere, and, of course, The Matrix.
Each of them approached the presentation of the problem in its own way, bringing the reasoning to different degrees of horror and consequences for a person. The main feature of all films can be summarized in an old phrase that crumbled on the Internet more than a decade ago – a kitten raised among dogs considers himself a dog. So it all boils down to a robot or a human-made operating system starting to see itself as a human being, stronger and smarter. And who has the power, the power, so do not take into account those who are inferior to you in terms of intellectual development.
Again, the idea of breathing the spark of life into inanimate matter became a classic, thanks to Mary Shelley. This idea fits perfectly with movies on this topic, otherwise how else can we call the process of humanizing – in this case, AI – attempts to make it an equivalent interlocutor with feelings and intentions, as well as analytical abilities.
And putting a person inside a huge suit, which here is called ARC (something like an exoskeleton, complete synchronization with which occurs through neural communication), clearly hints that the person is still primal. He first of all gives birth to the idea and controls these gadgets, he composes the code. Immediately recalls “Robocop”, when watching which I thought that no matter how dangerous robots were to humans, more enduring and smarter than he, a person has the right to both create it and stop it.
Regarding “Atlas” it is difficult to say how it surpasses previously presented stories, even because it resembles everything previously seen – the theme as in the above films, “Fifth Element” and “Star Wars” visual part, and even a little “Gamer” with Gerard Butler and “Prepare for Player One” with Ty Sheridan by how the scene of capturing the assistant of the main villain at the beginning of the film simulates the passage of a computer game. But the simulation of the passage of a computer game, in fact, comes from the fact that the director of “Atlas” Brad Peyton was inspired by the shooter Titanfall.
Atlas does not offer radically new ideas in the relationship between artificial intelligence and humans, unfortunately, this is the most passable project. Unfortunately for Jennifer Lopez and her longtime co-producer Benny Medina, with whom they made almost all of her films, but also her music albums.
This film directly shows in the first minutes a catastrophe for the globe with all its bugs and gadgets, when a bot decides to destroy humanity because it is still rapidly moving towards its own destruction, so it decides to get ahead of it. The idea is that by creating something smarter than a person, the author of the development runs the risk of losing control. Which, again, is not unique.
Fiction models the future, starting from the realities of the surrounding world, in which its authors live here and now. “Blade Runner”, “Terminator”, “I am a Robot”, “Lucy” and other lesser-known films that touch on the topic of AI can be watched with pleasure today, but the world does not stand still and from time to time pulls to see fresh fiction, reasoning about the problems and challenges of today.
Atlas is just such a movie, modern and topical. No, do not think, the authors of the picture do not deny us the pleasure of watching humanoid androids, do not forget to occasionally use the services of a good stylist and barber. But still the central reasoning is built around the possibility of a fusion of human consciousness and machine consciousness, whatever we mean by the latter. And if you let someone into the holy of holies of your being, into your consciousness and into your soul, then the question of trust inevitably arises. After all, under the impenetrable mask that we wear every day, there are old injuries, resentments, regrets, fears. Including the fear of betrayal on the part of those to whom, having already risked it, we opened up completely. But at the same time, trust is a great force that can pave the way for a way out of a seemingly hopeless situation.
J. Lo is perfect for the mood and it is difficult for me to imagine anyone else in the role of the main character. She does not match the type of Marine, as, for example, the heroine Emily Blunt from “Frontier of the Future”. But she shouldn't. This is what Smith says in no uncertain terms when describing the benefits of their neuro-union for mission purposes. She is an analyst and expert in the world of the main antagonist. She's human and vulnerable. For the warhead, following the protocols and constant optimism is the machine.
The visual tape complements the semantic part well. The picture is designed in a deliberately playful and not serious style, and this contrasts and emphasizes what is happening with the main character. At the same time, it is clear that the creators paid a lot of attention to the visual, and it is always pleasant to follow what is happening on the screen.
From "Atlas" did not turn out another strong action movie against the backdrop of scenery from the supposed future. Nope. But it turned out lamp, cozy and very personal fiction, which is interesting to watch and through the prism of which it is interesting to think and reflect.
I didn't really want to watch Atlas. Somehow I was not impressed by the project completely, and Jennifer Lopez on the main character rather rejected. However, I decided to see the film on the weekend, and to my surprise, the tape was not so bad.
The plot about the dangers of AI, which has already become obsolete, frankly, in the film actually fades into the background and is the background for the story, the scenery, if you will. And the main timekeeping is the free adaptation of Titanfall 2. Yes, 'Atlas' is really a kind of interpretation of a shooter about giant robots, only less large-scale and spectacular. Yes, the time has long come when video games give a much better production than movies.
So, the main character Atlas Shepherd, during an unsuccessful tactical operation, finds herself on an unfriendly unknown planet. And her only partner and savior in combination is Smith’s combat fur, controlled by AI. And to survive, Atlas will need to learn to trust the machine, despite its bias.
And in general, this path that Atlas and Smith walk together is really worth noting. The path is not only physical, from the place of fall to the point of evacuation, but also the way of building trusting relationships with each other.
I want to make a positive note of the schedule. In most cases, CGI experts do prove that they do not eat their bread for nothing. The picture looks great, and this applies to both objects in the foreground like the same robot, and the fantastic backgrounds of an alien planet.
There is an action in the film, but it cannot be said that there is so much of it. The fighting scenes are quite spectacular, the finale is full of drive, although, of course, not the level of the notorious Titanfall 2. In general, this is not a minus of the film in any case, because after all, this is not some "Pacific Rim", and the creators had the goal not only to pile action, but also to tell a relatively good story.
Atlas is mostly a one-actor movie, or rather an actress, and Jennifer Lopez has unfortunately justified my concerns. She does not look in this image, and she does not pull out her film with her play.
What's the average? Atlas was a fantastic action movie that was better than I expected. Yes, not perfect, but this is an unofficial adaptation of Titanfall I liked. I recommend it as a one-off fantasy for the evening.
Natflix continues with enviable constancy to stamp a quality passerman, and this film is not an exception to the rule. I would even say that we have the quintessence of this trend. Proven templates, famous actors, well, or personalities in the main roles, the plot collected from the boru on the pine tree, well, there is no graphics. There is nothing more to describe here, except to expand and deepen what has already been said.
Atlas is a completely secondary and artless film, which does not negate one simple fact - it works plus / minus. Its authors, such a feeling, did not even try to be original, content with templates played a thousand times and inspired by quite recognizable classical fantastic works. In fact, during the viewing, the impression was created that literally everything is erased from various other fantastic and about fantastic films of the past. Here you have a perfectly clear continuity of the main line of distrust of the main character to robots, as well as the development of relations with robots, stripped of what is characteristic of "I am a robot". And whole chunks of some scenes, like the briefing moment before the mission, which literally repeats a similar briefing from the movie Aliens. However, this can be continued for a long time, which will only emphasize the main essence. The authors of this picture simply took what they liked, shoved it into a blender, mixed and stirred up the kinzo on motives.
And it would be very bad if they did not manage to competently process the whole case with a file, like in that joke. But they did. For all the secondaryness of the Atlas, the film does not seem to be a ludicrous Frankenstein monster, assembled on a knee of heterogeneous and poorly connected parts. Not at all. The narrative turned out not to be strong, but at least devoid of obvious shoals, inflections and alienities. Yes, God knows that, having a desire, you can easily find a whole bunch of things that you can find fault with, but the final result is unlikely to be called a blatant second-rate slag. If you do not look for some sacred meaning or complex philosophical reasoning in this film, but perceive it as another fantastic action movie without claims to depth, then you can watch it quite well.
Now about the famous person and actors. Yes, the film scored a certain number of recognizable representatives of this profession. Not the stars of the first magnitude, but not the doubtful rascals. However, they have so little screen time that the authors clearly invited them solely for the recognizable faces on the cover. As for the main character in the performance of Jenipher Lopez... Well -- yeah -- she's trying. He's even trying to play something. It turns out, however, weak, since it presses purely on one line, on which it burns. Honestly, that’s what got a little tired of “Atlas” is the endless hysteria of the protagonist, on which, in fact, the whole narrative is built. Not ... I understand everything ... the arc of character, there, rebirth and these are all standard templates straight from the "Thousand-Face Hero", but such things do not work well if the character has, in fact, only one characteristic that he has to change in himself.
In general, Lopez perfectly showed how a bad actor differs from a good one, pressing herself throughout the entire timekeeping exactly one emotion and one type of behavior. And I can’t say that her efforts were nothing at all. In some places you can even admit, it looked convincing. That’s just this very “places” pretty much smeared with the fact that the pop diva has not learned for all the time that she is acting in the movies, to live her role at least somewhat convex and endow her character with at least some features, except for the main one that has already been announced. And yes, questionable attempts to bulge anything, such as with her coffee-cooking habits, are not worth it. Oh, come on.
Keep moving. This is modern fiction, which means that the lion’s share of everything that happens in front of us on the screen was collected on the computer. It turned out, I would say, unevenly. This is especially noticeable in the first half of the film, where the authors wanted to scale. Personally, these attempts, to put it mildly, alarmed me, since the quality of the graphics all this did not go far from completely second-rate fiction, category B. But further, closer to the middle, the picture stabilizes, and in some places even looks quite good. The only thing is that the dark ending was not as clear as I would like. Although here, the authors acted strictly according to the template from Campbell’s book, literally reading the idea that “the darkest hour before dawn”. And they literally showed it on the screen.
What is the result? Film "Atlas", is a template, completely secondary and clichéd not even fiction, but rather "fantasy". At the same time, the tape did not cause any bright rejection or irritation to me personally, however, as it did not hook so much that I completely immersed myself in viewing. If you like movies about some conditional future, about robots, space flights, new planets, etc., you can watch the picture of Brad Payton as an evening burner that does not pretend to be anything. There is no greater claim to this work.
The more I get to know people, the more I trust AI.
Brad Payton’s recent directorial work on the Netflix platform can be safely called one of the best sci-fi films of the year, and this is no wonder: the filmmaker knows how to shoot spectacular audience summer blockbusters (Rampage, San Andreas and Journey 2), and this time he again managed to capture my attention for almost two hours of timing. A fascinating and spectacular speech about the sore topic of the confrontation between man and artificial intelligence, which does not feel secondary, but once again warning that it is time to stop.
I like almost everything here: a great form with a good tempo rhythm, a well-written script that fits both a clear exposition, and good / non-clichéd dialogues that could be nominal with an introductory genre, as well as a far from stupid semantic load: the more I get to know people, the more I trust AI. The picture is quite straightforward and simple, it says its governing idea head-on to be universal for the perception of the audience: nothing justifies genocide, even if it is statistically and rationally verified and for the benefit of future generations of earthlings, as well as a positive view of the notorious fear of “high technology” a la any thing can be used for harm and benefit. It all depends only on our choice, because we are free to do it ourselves.
J. Lo's acting job was good. It still looks good and pleases the eye with the presence in the frame. Simu Liu once again plays the android-deviant and quite falls into the archetypal image of the antagonist with its obvious and understandable motivation, which, although contrary to Asimov’s law, remains rational, albeit radical. Operating work, editing and sound at a high level, although in places you can see the angular CGI.
'Atlas' is a typical platform streaming film that's watched, got high and went on. This is a good choice for acquaintance on one of the hot summer evenings, but, of course, you should choose the largest possible screen diagonal and the best sound system for film screening, because on board there is an original in Dolby Atmos. I guess so: post-cyberpunk and cosmo operas are still on the ropes, and Atlas continues to keep up with the times and keep a finger on the pulse. The future is already here, ChatGPT is fun and scary, and we all continue to pay utility bills on the Russian Post with the knowledge that at any moment Cameron’s prediction will come true long before we realize the Doomsday. The more I look at such pictures, the more I notice goosebumps running through the body.
8 out of 10
I will not go into details about the work on the film, since there are many disadvantages in both special effects and computer graphics. I don’t even want to comment on acting, because apparently the filmmakers have not decided what they wanted?! - Namely, to show the dramatic game of the main character (J-Lo) or try on her exo-suit and let in the action expenditure.
In any case, there are many lovers of futurism, lovers of space, fantasy with the participation of robots, and of course the books of Isaac Asimov. But with the advent of new and more complex technologies, new video games appear that carry whole drama stories. Regarding the plot, what seemed to me already something familiar, namely, starting with the name of the main character - Shepard, who encountered the series "Stargate, Atlantis" will understand me. And also the iconic trilogy of games from BIOWARE - Mass Effect. So the Mass Effect is about Commander Shepard who is trying to save not only our planet Earth, but the entire Milky Way galaxy from super-advanced AI machines called reapers that come once every 50,000 years and destroy the organic life form when it reached the peak of its evolution. What is it?! The logic of AI as it evolves to destroy living beings, justifying it by the fact that civilizations themselves at the peak of development will begin to destroy themselves. Wars. Ecosystem. Politics. Crisis and so on.
In the film, we see a similar situation. The creation turned against the creator. AI vs. humans.
When I saw the exo-skeleton of the main character I immediately remembered the game Mass Effect, it is almost identical, and in the game it is called 'ATLAS'. What is it?! Reference or coincidence?!
Next, I will list the coincidences:
1) Rangers in exo-skeletons (film) - Alliance Space (game)
2) Spaceship for landing (film) - Ship "Normandy" (game)
(3) Collection of tokens of fallen fighters (film) - quest in the game (game)
Friend General Jack Booth (film) - Admiral Hackett or Admiral Anderson (game)
(5) Smith (film) - EDI (game)
What is this movie with references?! Conclusions?! Screenwriters strike?!
Given the cast of actors rather dramatic nature of the film is more designed to collect the budget, or its spending. No more, no less.
P.S. - the film is rather a complete gestalt therapy of the main character, with a bouquet of childhood psychological traumas.
Today, there is nothing innovative and exciting left of modern American cinema. Whatever the script, the plot repeats over and over again, everything is insanely predictable, the stamp chases ... Not bypassed this trend and the film Atlas.
The idea itself, though not new, but not so bad and it could be developed into something more interesting and creative, but alas, everything flowed back into banalism and predictability.
In the first minutes of the film, you begin to catch yourself thinking that the behavior of the main character Atlas (Lopes), who behaves extremely inadequately, constantly aggressions on everyone around, is insanely annoying. Make-up artists and the director tried to make the aggression cute, hidden under the supposedly cute hairstyle and cute face of Lopez, but the effect was quite the opposite. Then more! After the aggression, the main character constantly cries, curls her lips, remembers something painful from her childhood and it is just an endless stream of tears and whining!!! No dynamics and development of the role of the main character. Everything is monotonous and somehow thoughtless... To all this, you can add the bad game of Lopez herself, after all, the previous nominations for the Golden Raspberry did not appear without grounds.
Apparently, it is worth noting the current political trend of Hollywood, where now the main villains are no longer necessary ' Evil Russians', but increasingly people resembling the Chinese with their Asian appearance. In fact, the main villain in the film is exactly that.
Of all the negatives after watching the film, I would like to note only one positive point - the work of graphic specialists. Everything here is done beautifully and technically verified. Once again we face the predominance of creative technical specialists over the work of actors, screenwriters, directors, etc. I only got four for their work.
Trend on the face - fewer and fewer really interesting and exciting science fiction films in Hollywood. The bar of quality inexorably tends downward. .
Poor Jason Lee, so missed in the role of Glavgad! But this Simu Liu is not looking so bad. The conflict is known and interesting. The woman who freed the genie needs to shut down the gestalt and lull the chief robot on his own planet. But to do that, you need to defeat your own demons, give up double coffee, and finally connect to her avatar. Smith, as in the Matrix, is a measure of philosophy and citations. 'Guess my name' and 'Cake or cake?' For a psychologist, the result is unforeseen. Chic Casca Vicks five times that survives. I have always thought that when humanity overcomes the restriction on the education of the individual in his 20s and more years from birth, and not the injection of all the knowledge of mankind into his brain with a simple prick - then we will heal! Robots will not consume us, nor will bacteria and viruses. Who will serve them? Change the oil there. Planet Sheleziak in 'The Secret of the Third Planet' Remember? Diamond dust solves the problem of riots. Jennifer Lopez is only good thanks to the brilliant dubbing.
I looked at him. Watchable, if not irritated by the emphasis on Lopez with hairstyle and the presence of all nationalities. Good effects, some topics with AI and robots, a hundred poods such development will be once. It was interesting.
Artificial intelligence breaks out of human oppression and suddenly decides that these people can do nothing but destroy everything around them (not so untrue). The beginning is very similar to a Terminator. Atlas is like the moon before him. Not to mention that Atlas failed. Now let's be specific.
The plot is really very simple and abounds in a bunch of inconsistencies, but in the end, fiction does not suffer so much from such problems. The heroine of Lopez needs to deal with the boss of robots and dump him on the most do not spoil right on his planet, on which he flew, when the descent of meat bags failed to destroy. But of course everything goes in one place, and the heroine is in a combat suit with built-in artificial intelligence.
The message of the film is simple: the main character throughout the film is trying to make friends with the AI and begin to trust it Robots us friends in fact, all things. (very similar in this regard to the film ' I, robot').
The film runs for 2 hours, but about 40 minutes the heroine talks with her costume, who tries to make friends with her sin in half, and at the same time works as a psychologist. Therefore, the action here is not so much and it is almost all concentrated in the end. In principle, I liked this balance: conversations do not have time to get very bored, and there is no overload with action. But in principle, when the battle begins on the screen, the colorfulness is enough. And in general, when there is a big cool robot on the screen, it becomes somehow good on the soul.
There is not much to say about the heroes of the film. It's a theater by one actor, Jennifer Lopez. The rest of us are just extras. As for Lopez herself, she is not very impressive. For example, the same Will Smith in ' I'm a robot' much more vividly shows his way from total distrust of robots and even in some sense hatred to friendship with a representative of hardware. I think I could have found someone better in the place.
In general, we have a typical Netflix movie. The budget is a little lacking (the graphics are quite clumsy in my opinion), the main character does not stretch a little, the plot is also not a fountain. But you can and should watch the movie, especially if you like science fiction. Not so many recently released such films, and fishless and Atlas will go.
A little upfront I will give an assessment, because some day I will review the film with a more sober look and perhaps change my opinion, but for now it is.
8 out of 10
Once, people were filled in the knowledge of being so much that they were able to make robots-androids, in order to facilitate their difficult life through artificial intelligence. However, one day a terrible thing happened: all these robots rebelled and began to destroy humanity right where it was caught. Mankind does not like this attitude, of course, so it calls robots AI terrorists and creates an international coalition to combat the new threat. The coalition is so strong that it gives light to all these androids almost all over the world, and the main AI terrorist named Harlan (played by Simu Liu), catapults from planet Earth somewhere in distant space, but, like Carlson, promises to return. Here, in general, and the seed for a two-hour “epic” for the next salvation of the world.
You can immediately see that the film was shot for one actress - Jennifer Lopez, since all the others appear as ordinary extras. Even the main villain, the same Harlan, the great and terrible, firstly, appears on the screen only a couple of times, and not to say that for a long time, and secondly, it looks so faint even in the final battle that, as they say, mother does not grieve. Of course, I am not a film expert, nor a professional critic, so my opinion does not claim to be true, but what I saw, I saw.
Lopez is different. At least she had some screen time. However, the world-famous star of cinema and everything else, also does not shine brilliant acting. Again, purely in my opinion, may her fans forgive me. The whole first half she cries, suffers and reflects, unpleasantly curved at the same time lips, the second - selflessly mows a synthetic enemy, severely shifting her eyebrows in a robotic suit.
And there is too much "boltology." This chatter ungodly drags the movie time instead of carrying the plot forward. What's there to say? The plot is beaten so much that there is no living place on it - any action or even the word of any of the characters is predictable so much that it becomes scary.
In short: a movie for one actress, and it is average in everything. Unless the camera work is good. Well, although the eternal pathos is not so much, but still present at times. An evening can be killed by watching the movie “Atlas”, but for more it, apparently, was not designed. But such a movie has a right to be.