Remake / remake of the film “Strangers” in 2007. This version of 80% repeats the original, but the subtitle “Chapter 1” hints at a trilogy, with both sequels rumored to be released later this year. The director of the entire trilogy is Rennie Harlin, familiar to us from the fourth part of “Nightmares on Elm Street” and the very fresh “Shelter”.
In my opinion, the new Strangers is slightly weaker than the original source due to the fact that lovebirds came to replace the couple with a love crisis, which somewhat simplifies their arch. In addition, the script hints at additional motifs of masked maniacs, which was not in the 2007 film. Suspense in the first half of the story is still good, and even does without deafening violins in the climax.
Otherwise, plot twists, secondary characters and even screamers are transferred with the zeal of a neighbor on the desk, who was asked to write off but not one in one. It seems to me that this is not a necessary remake, as I find the original still relevant. However, if the sequels succeed in deepening the lore, modern history will well deserve the right to exist.
I recently watched the film Strangers, Chapter 1 in 2024, which is a typical representative of the horror genre about a young couple who came to an abandoned town in Oregon. The plot of the film is built around a classic situation: their car breaks down, they are offered to stay in the house, and then the nightmare begins.
Unfortunately, the film left a very negative impression on me. The main reason is the illogical behavior of the main characters. From the start, it feels like they’ve never seen a horror movie and don’t know how to handle situations like this. The heroine constantly hides in a closet without a lock, hoping that she will not be found. The guy acts even more illogically: runs away from his pursuers and hides, instead of using the window to escape.
Especially annoying is the fact that the heroes never tried to find weapons, despite the fact that they spent a lot of time hiding in the house. Even when they tried to lock the doors and find something like a weapon, it was too late.
The most disappointing thing about the film is its ending. As the name suggests, Part One clearly implies a sequel. However, the end of the film leaves a sense of indifference. It's not interesting what happens next, and it seems like it's over. The second part seems completely unnecessary, and I doubt the first part will pay off.
2 out of 10
The film's illogical and annoying moments made me think about turning it off in the middle. I hope the sequel doesn't see the light of day.
The first release of strangers I had for a year. End of zero was. The trailer then impressed as much as possible, but the implementation pumped up. Well, I wasn't impressed with Liv Tyler and my boyfriend, and the trio of killers weren't either. Forgot it. Now, after a long time, a new vision interested, largely due to the most gloomy presentation, and the presence in the credits of the name of Richard Brake. Who needs no introduction. But the fact of shooting Rennie Harlin surprised. Largely due to the fact that Harlin shoots very specific, and probably only he understands projects, while his successful horror projects are in the past, and in general scattered throughout the eighties, nineties, zeroes. (This is not about the Deal with the Devil, but about Mind Hunters.) So, it turned out, a new story about a trio of masked killers suddenly came to me. Maybe the movie came out right because of some "return." Harlin to the roots. But everything in order.
The beginning is very standard. A successful couple, not yet newlyweds, but about to go for a weekend in the woods. And I must say, and this is already a geographical feature, that the resting place our heroes chose in Wisconsin.
- They were sent to Hell? - Worse, to Wisconsin. Dogma.
What's the point? Yes, the fact that the state of Wisconsin, this is like the most fierce Vasiuks of any region of the CIS, where among the entertainments only liquors, and other dubious attractions like apartments where people disappear. But not the point. Let us assume that our lovers were captivated by the sight of the forest hills. When they arrive, they encounter the Orthodox flavor of these places, namely, the good ones, the inhabitants of these places. And here everything is as canonical as possible - Diner with strange people, silent sheriff, and other local freaks that all their appearance say - Run away. But love overshadows common sense, and so our almost newlyweds decide to spend the night in a cabin in the woods. A wise decision.
Stylistically, the movie is like, wow. He's gloomy. The fog among the moss-eaten trees, the forest seems to be watching you every second. And of course, the atmosphere of impending horror. Which appears immediately, which is a big plus of this rethinking of history. Our three killers instantly jump into the game. I liked this performance better, as if the psychopaths from a graphic novel had found real flesh, and now they are trying to put out all their anger alone on random travelers. A bonus is the fact that with obvious facelessness, the character of the slashers is still there, and we can observe a clear demonstration of psychopathic natures, through body movements and minimal demonstrations of mood. The hunt, by the way, takes place under racially loyal country tunes. Rennie didn't miss it either. The combination of puppet masks, fog outside the window, the silence of the forest, and the gloomy face of a rag scarecrow do their job, you absolutely understand, - The chances of survival are zero.
I will also add that the behavior of the main characters for the first time resembles the behavior of rational people. There is no senseless attempt to commit illogical acts, instead there is a real confrontation with the killers, and in addition, the acting does not look boring, it is interesting and fascinating to watch the attempts of a young couple to save their lives.
One thing is a little depressing - for all the fullness of the narrative - this is only the first part of the trilogy. Therefore, there is a fear that either Mr. Harlin will create a masterpiece, and Strangers will become a kind of creative resuscitation of the director. Or we will be disappointed after the debut admiration. Time will tell. And yes, I hope that in addition to the enchanting suspense, Richard Brake will show himself in a similar way.
Claude comes out with a movie and has the word ‘beginning’ in the title, what does it mean? That’s right – the birth of a story that the viewer has already seen, but does not know where it all started. How did it all start?
In Finnish, either the word 'beginning' is missing, or Rennie Harlin simply doesn't understand the meaning of the word for movies.
The first two parts of Strangers came out a long time ago. The first part back in 2008, the second in 2018. The first picture was very strong in terms of suspense, overtaken by horror and demonstration of domestic terror. And the credits in the film even said that such a story actually happened. Although this is not the case and in part, director Brian Bertino was inspired by the story of the murder of Sherror Tate, partly using his childhood memories.
The second film was also quite creepy and tense, but still not the same as the first. This is because history has essentially repeated itself. But with some changes.
What did Harlene do? He stupidly shot his film on the plot of the first Strangers, without adding anything new to the story!
If at the very beginning there is still hope that the film will live up to its title and Strangers. Inception or Strangers. The first chapter will tell you about the root cause of the craving for aggression of three masked people, how they even appeared, how they began to kill, then when watching these hopes are dashed like Carolco after Rennie Harlin’s “Island of Thugs” in the mid-90s.
Yes, it is reported that the director shot three parts and after the First Chapter, the viewer will see two more and there will be more stories about masked people, but it had to be done, at least a little, already in the first part of the new trilogy! Spectator interest is important and necessary, if the creators conceived and swung as much as three films!
In principle, if you look at some sequels - sequels, triquels, restarts, released many years later, the creators of such paintings try to make the long-awaited continuation exciting and meaningful, so that such a continuation does not "suspend" compared to earlier projects.
The end of Strangers. The beginning hints that the sequel will be and it has even been shot (both the second and third films), but so far the restart of this story is rather weak and unattractive for one simple reason: Harlin’s project does not offer anything new to the audience.
Plus, the plot of the picture, in addition to its secondary, is also extremely stupid in terms of the behavior of the characters. No, we certainly know how stupid movie characters can be, but in this picture Rennie Harlin showed the guys who have a kind of instinct for self-preservation in place, but there is practically no gray matter in the skull.
This is especially evident in the scene with the car, jumping into which the pedal into the floor should be pressed, not wait. Or in the episode, when the main character for some reason has a weapon, waiting for him to be VERY times rammed... Or when he speaks in the night cottage, instead of punching the butt of a shotgun.
The film is not thought out and is made in the format of a typical horror, in which a maniac or maniac is obviously smarter than their victims who want to live, but because of their stupidity are simply doomed.
But look at you. I do not impose my opinion on anyone.
Strangers: The Beginning is a film that not only failed to live up to expectations, but also left viewers in a state of frustration and indignation. Director Rennie Harlin, known for such works as “Skazolaz” and “Die Hard 2”, failed to create something innovative and exciting, and his work in this film appears as a banal and faceless copy of the more successful first part.
The storyline of the film does not contain anything fresh and original. A young couple embark on a journey, but their vacation turns into a nightmare when they encounter three psychopathic masked strangers. This motif was already embodied better in the first film - Strangers (2007), and Harlin could not bring anything new and interesting to his version. Instead, he simply repeated the already known plot moves without attempting to create something original.
The cast also failed to create any interesting or memorable characters. Madeline Petsch and Froy Gutierrez, who play the main roles, could not endow their characters with characters that can cause any emotions in the audience. Their characters appear as typical young people who get into trouble, but do not possess any interesting or deep traits. They are devoid of charisma, and their interaction with each other and with other characters looks unnatural and boring.
The musical accompaniment also does not correspond to the theme of the film and does not create the necessary mood. The composer failed to create something that would emphasize the fear and tension that should be present in the picture. Instead, the music sounds banal and uninteresting, which only exacerbates the film's failures. It does not create an atmosphere of fear and does not help the audience to feel the importance of what is happening.
The visual effects are not impressive either. The camera does not create interesting shots, and the operator failed to emphasize the significance of the scenes. Instead, the camera simply captures what is happening without causing any interest or emotional impact.
Overall, Strangers: The Beginning is a film that contains nothing new or intriguing. Harlin was unable to create something original, and his work looks like a banal and faceless copy of the first part. The actors did not create interesting characters, and the music does not correspond to the theme of the film. The visual effects are not impressive either. If you are looking for something innovative and exciting, then it is better not to waste time watching this film. It is not worth your attention and will not cause you any emotions other than wasting time.
In 2008, one of the most spectacular thrillers of the decade was released, namely Strangers with Liv Tyler and Scott Speedman. The film kept the audience in constant tension and horrified the actions of a trio of maniacs in masks, who simply had nothing to do and began to terrorize an innocent couple. The sensations after watching Strangers were very disturbing and it is not surprising that over time this movie became a classic of the genre. Now the story of “Strangers” took Director Rennie Harlin, decided to partially rethink and supplement.
In the center of the plot of Strangers: The Beginning are Maya and Ryan, who travel by car across America and at one not the best moment they turn, of course, on the wrong road and find themselves in a small town, which is full of provincial areas. Heroes are not very confused by the fact that the town is not marked on digital maps and seems to be outside of time and space. Maya and Ryan are not going to turn away and eventually find themselves in a typical local diner where they meet the residents of the town, including a rather suspicious sheriff. But after the heroes' car is inspected at the car service, they realize that they will have a long repair and need to spend the night in the town.
Going to the house, which hosts guests, Maya and Ryan expected to just rest and move on in the morning if the repairs go well, but very quickly they realize that now they are becoming prey for three masked hunters. They circled the house and make it clear that it will be impossible to get out without the last one. Maniacs have great speed, they are masters of hiding in the night and for the time being they play with the main characters in “cat and mouse”. And although it is really scary, Maya and Ryan have the opportunity to come up with a plan of action, but it is far from the fact that it will work as they expect.
Rennie Harlin's film has no direct connection to the 2008 film. Except that the focus is again a trio of maniacs in masks. The other characters and locations are completely different. In part, the film can be called a remake, but at the same time it is a prequel, which tells us a little more about the killers, but at the same time do not expect a full disclosure of the cards from Harlin, since he shot not one film at all, but a whole trilogy, the subsequent parts of which will eventually be released.
Most of the action, both in the original and in this series, takes place inside and near a lonely house, from where you can get out if not forward with your feet, then with great injuries. Harlin does a good job of escalating the tension and shows some really scary moments. However, without genre templates here, too, can not do. Both the maniacs and their victims do a lot of stupid things, which is a little disappointing, since in our time it would be possible to shoot a more believable and logical story. I would also like to see Sheriff Richard Brake get more screen time, but apparently his character will be revealed more in later parts.
As a result, Strangers: Inception is a fascinating, but still far from perfect and often predictable slasher. Of course, it is still an order of magnitude higher than other similar stories that have appeared on screens in recent years, which means it is quite possible to watch.
Maya and Ryan stop at a rented cabin in the Oregon wilderness, waiting for the car to be fixed. There's a knock at the door at night. 'Is Tamara here?'
The first Strangers entered without knocking. No one expected anything special from the 2007 film, except to look at Liv Tyler in an unusual genre for her. The result was shocking, and who came up with this terrible story about how three scumbags terrorize two good people, Brian Bertino will once again powerfully perform in the horror genre only 13 years later, in the magnificent “Desolation of Darkness and Evil”.
The second “Strangers” in 2018 developed a terrible concept – now the victims of maniacs in masks became a whole family, and the arena of action – a whole recreation park. And although the shocking effect was no longer, the work of Johannes Roberts, created by him in the right place between two shark "Blue abyss", remained in memory as a worthy sequel.
And here's Strangers. Beginning. The thriller sells as a prequel, and the tagline promises to reveal "who's under the mask." Not true, not true. In fact, before us a thorough remake: the characters are two again (the couple in love), the location was again a cabin in the wilderness (of course, shot by the characters through Airbnb), and frightened three, and the masks on them are the same. If we look under the masks, it is only in the sequel - the story ends around the same place as the original film, although TA did not suggest the end of the sequel. Not for nothing in the scene in the bar flashed for three seconds characteristic actor Richard Brake. And in general, in the film a whole bunch of characters who do not participate in the plot - religious kids and a burger saleswoman, a company of young people, a kind waitress, etc.
I hope that the second part somehow reveals the story from a new angle, because so far it is a diligent remake, offering nothing new. From the attempts to diversify history, we distinguish the scrapping of the unspoken slasher rule that heroes should be weaker than villains. In this version, at the most critical moment, the hero receives a great advantage, and it looks not like giveaways in a game of cat and mouse from Strangers, but as a yawn of a piece in chess. If the antagonists (at least some) really gave the victims a reason to escape and win, it would be an unexpected move, albeit one that destroys the canon of the genre. But no. Villains stay strong, except they fool around a little. Also, the characters are given a reason to experience strong remorse... but this does not affect the plot.
The name of the director - Rennie Harlin - no one will hope. The days of 'Nightmares on Elm Street 4', 'Die Hard 2', 'Climb climber' and 'Deep Blue Sea' are over. Harleen today is a dull artisan whose recent "Mason" I watched on my fifth or sixth try - such an anguish.
If the continuation of the story proves that I am wrong and the film gets a bright and original development, I would be happy. But for now, trying to find novelty in Strangers. Beginning is as useless as trying to find the ill-fated Tamara in the hero's house. .
Am I spitting on your Funny Games at Lake Barbara Paradise?
I had one small orange... Due to a delay to the session (some of us were very delayed), it was not possible to see the creepy (?) start of the new product rental under the promising (?) name of the year. Since one of the reviewers kindly pointed out how the film began in the text, we don’t have to blame the sins of someone who has delayed them. It turns out that Richard Brake himself appeared in one of the shots, wow! Many girls will write that a horror story, but we are more interested in its texture, which allows us to see him as an interesting actor. For us, he is the perfect embodiment of Harry Hole from the Yu Nesbø series of novels.
All right, let him go, it's your fault, people. I got involved in the movie after being late. The most original "Strangers" of 2008 at the time did not see, did not even suspect the existence. But: (a) a curious trailer; (b) the dubious, but still cult star of the director's craft shop Rennie Harlin; (c) the intriguing subtitle "part one" - pushed to purchase a cherished ticket at the cinema. No expectations were set, the brilliant slasher was not demanded, they did not bawl at the nude. Now the bar for an interesting plot for films is not so high.
To the surprise of the sufferers, we dare to note now that the production brainchild is popular because of Riverdale's Madeline Petsch added its colors to the summer mood of horrors. Ahead of the viewer expect the premiere of very intriguing horrors and thrillers, so such a seed in the face of the first chapter of a long-conceived trilogy pleases the eye. What to do, I liked how everything was filmed economically, energetically and erotically in a short time + for easy money. A couple of locations, 5 main characters, three of whom are masked all the time, a little creepy violence and a lot of tension from the traditional game of cat and mouse. So for them, young people!
There is no need to come from a gluttonous New York to such a wilderness to amuse yourself loved ones. She's a vegetarian, he's asthmatic. Couple of years! If she doesn't bite into a cheeseburger, how will she stand up for herself? If he needs an inhaler all the time, why doesn't he sit in the backyard? Okay, joke, if both of them hadn't gone on a road trip, the audience wouldn't have witnessed the total horror. Above we (not them) wrote about the bar for modern cinema, so you can condescend to the behavior of the victims. Of course, there are all sorts of questions there. They shoot without warning.
In general, we need to understand that we are not in complete delight with the film, there is nothing to think about. The production pleased the eyes, the plot interested, unpleasant faces under masks I want to see faster, the guy with the girl attract the pen to the face, a sharp ending with a warning, even a scene after the credits (so came up with the creators, ah). But that's fine. Most of all, the nervous nerves were touched by the appearance of a creepy girl who stood outside the hut door in complete darkness and asked about Tamara. Who's Tamara, we have to find out. I wish they hadn't forgotten. It's just a scary moment. Knock, Tamara, escape.
I knew from the beginning that as soon as the movie came out in the theater, I would see it. I had no idea what the new version would be, but I was hoping it would be interesting because I was interested in the trailer. So, the day off, I'm going.
Young lovers are forced to spend the night in a house in the forest, not knowing that they are already being followed.
Starring Madeline Petsch (Maia) and Froy Gullierrez (Ryan). To begin with, I was not familiar with the works of actors, so that I have nothing to compare with.
And so, the acting is convincing. Their emotions, conversations and actions are exactly what people in a given situation should have.
The actors look harmoniously together, real emotions, feelings, love are felt between them. Due to this, you begin to feel sympathy and worry about the characters, and in such films this is important.
I am glad that basically the actions of the heroes are logical, when they need to look for something to defend themselves, and not close in the pantry.
The plot is a new vision of previously shot films. Most of the action is reminiscent of the 2007 film. So, for those who have watched movies, shot previously know what awaits the heroes.
For a film of this genre began too banal, sweet lovers, a stop in a suspicious diner, forced overnight stay in a house in the woods. The director made the residents of the town so unfriendly, apparently wanted the viewer to immediately begin to build theories about who could be enemies. I thought it was a bit too much.
I already said that the characters with logic, more often, everything is fine, but there were moments that caused questions. For example, why kiss in the car, joke when you see that people are not unfriendly, wash when someone broke into your house recently, scream in the woods, knowing that you may be noticed. And the stupidest scene, of course, is when Ryan could do a thing, but instead started having conversations, apparently the director noticed that the characters are too smart and you need to bring a little stupidity into their actions.
In the film, good soundtracks that created a creepy atmosphere, the film keeps in suspense, but a lot of screamers were a little superfluous.
The work of the cameraman pleased the whole film, the shots shot in the foggy forest are very beautiful, large shots that allowed you to see the emotions.
I want to highlight the scene with the nail, it looks so natural and emotional, this is the best scene in the film.
Do you think Americans don’t look like their movies? How long can I stay in a house in the forest? There is no connection, no one lives nearby, and you need to learn to relax in such a place, so what is wrong with you?
I believe that the film was a success, but there are flaws in it, and the characters again violate all the laws of horror movies by deciding to split up, but the actors pulled out.
And by the way, you won't know exactly who's under the mask in this movie.
I’m not a big fan of the original Strangers. Of course, the film is good, but personally I didn’t have enough chemistry between the main characters to sweat and cry for their salvation. Either the eyeliner of the film was weak, or Speedman and Tyler did not press, or my heart is too callous, but I remained indifferent. Actually, that is why the presence of the remake-prequel-trilogy I accepted humbly and not indignant: my shrine was not encroached, so there is no reason for anger. Except for Rennie Harlin, of course.
In fact, the figure of the director skeptically raised my cinematic eyebrow. Rennie is a director, not deprived of talent, but let’s be honest: only Uwe Ball releases so much selective nonsense like him. Projects comrade chooses very doubtful, manages them no less doubtful, and therefore purely because of the name of the Director go to the movies, if only the uncouth fans of “Herakles”. However, in the filmography of the grief-creator there are also good works, to which I now count “Strangers”.
I imagine how the first tomato flies into me, but nevertheless I remain in the opinion that the remake (prequel?) came out good. He masterfully withstands the tense atmosphere from the first to the last minute. Not a single second of tension, stretched immediately after settling the heroes in the house on the outskirts, did not let go. The viewer literally feels his heart beating along with Medellin Patsh, either accelerating or slowing down. But the viewer has advantages: he sees the 25th frame in the mirror, behind the tree, in the distance, and therefore can not relax for a second. In general, the atmosphere in this film you can cut with a knife, and then freeze water in your hands - here old Rennie did not pump up.
The characters are surprisingly intelligent and logical. When you need to hide – hide, and in normal places, not under the bed. They look for weapons and instantly use them, without waiting for the weather near the sea, use every chance to snatch at least a fraction of the chance to survive in a deadly situation. I was particularly impressed by the nail episode (Hi, ‘A Quiet Place’), in which the heroine didn’t even groan, realizing that any sound made could become deadly.
Actors are also nice. I like Medellin very much, although she has no luck with projects. I see Froy Guttieres for the first time, but in my opinion, he gave a very good game for this level of horror. But most importantly, the kids patched the hole that burned my heart in the original. There is chemistry between the couple, you believe them, you root for them and you worry about them, rubbing sweaty palms. And all thanks to the beaten, but working technique - the show of romantic household lady between the characters. The same technique works well to lure the viewer into the trap of the very tension that will not release to the credits.
Separately, I want to praise the operator and the picture. Nothing supernatural we see, but the footage with brutal maniac, foggy forest and close-ups work delightfully. Honestly, I don’t know what Harlin is going to do in a trilogy (I hope he won’t make up something a la a new Halloween), but the first part certainly didn’t go bad, as my roommate confirmed with his ‘Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Scary, man! Remained incomplete some plot details such as mysterious rural religious fanatics and pale villagers, but, apparently, their roles are reserved for continuations.
In general, I liked the film, and I would not underestimate the ratings. This is a good remake of not the most outstanding horror from zero. To be angry and angry with him is a thankless business, it is better to savor the atmosphere and chemistry than to wash your fingers in the blood, putting low scores. I will not be as categorical as other connoisseurs, and I will put the film.
7 out of 10
Hello, my little lovers of violence in movies. Today we will talk about the first film of the trilogy, which is going to tell us about some of the most brutal crimes committed in America. All parts, by the way, are planned to be released in 2024.
At the beginning of the tape, we are given not the most pleasant statistics on the frequency of bad deeds committed. The figures hint at some immersion in the study of this topic. Then sinister chords are connected during the display of the endless forest from a bird's eye view. Exactly for a minute the hope of a positive outcome is instilled ... and immediately it is destroyed under the onslaught of stupidity, absurdity and stereotype.
A couple of lovers (Maya and Ryan) go on a long journey to a new life. In a small town, their car breaks down, and the guys are forced to rent a house for the night from a local hunter. Suddenly, three strangers start to scare them. . .
From this brief description, you can conclude that the plot is banal. The first 10 minutes of the film can cause a juicy facepalm: it seems that here collected all possible templates and clichés from low-budget horror films that they could. Your attention will be presented to the clumsy legs of the victims, and hasty decision-making, and disregard for their own safety. At the right time, the couple will even be separated for a while. The love line is screwed for a tick, the characters are not revealed (and still well, the characters and personalities of maniacs were left for continuations, and with the victims what?). A minimum of dialogue, a lot of predictable scenes and the absence of interesting situations make viewing so boring that you want to see the final credits as soon as possible.
Judge for yourself: a man with a bag on his head (a la Jason Voorhees from the second part of Friday the 13th), a woman in a geisha mask and someone else in a baby mask (reminiscent of a mask from the movie Happy Death Day) are chasing incredibly dull-headed and retarded main characters, whose actions are almost always illogical and inconsistent. The guy has a little enlightenment at the very beginning of the story, but then he begins to show outright stupidity (for example, in a critical situation, invites the girl to move from one enclosed space to another enclosed space ... instead of making a choice in favor of common sense and create an advantage in the open area). The actions of this idiot during the pre-final scene generally cause only laughter and bewilderment. The strange behavior of his companion is thrown into the eyes: then she almost does not care about what is happening, then begins to get very hysterical for no reason. There is no middle ground for her. How can you not start cheering for psychopaths in a mask?
Atmosphere. In horror, there is little action, the emphasis is on hide-and-seek, and at some point it begins to tire. The fact is that cheap and already quite boring tricks are used during attempts to scare the viewer. Add to this more small boring locations, and it turns out that nothing original creators can offer. Acting is weak, except for the final scenes, where the tantrums of the victims look natural.
Music. Quite normal musical accompaniment. It is a pity, but this is not enough to pull this malorror out of the swamp of incompetence of people who worked on this “miracle”.
Result. Another brazen and nasty attempt to get more money out of people. And the slogan that came up with, the intrigue tried to throw... Director Rennie Harlin said in an interview that the creators and producers wanted to "explore what happens to the victims of the violence shown in the film..." Hmm. And what happens to viewers whose brains are abused while watching this masterpiece, they are even slightly interested?
2 out of 10
(18%), so, attempt #1 to dissuade moviegoers from going to theaters at this bottom ... If you do take the risk, then below is the information for you.
P.S. There is a small scene after the animated credits. But I am sure that not everyone will want to sit even before her. .