How long ago it was, it's been 8 years since the movie was released - I was 22 years old and I went to the cinema to laugh in the company of young people. Even then, I was very unpleasantly surprised by how on the Internet aggressive fanatics Bazhenov and pseudo-moralists omit this film and everyone who likes it (by the way, insulting the person is a criminal case, but thousands of miles away everyone is so brave). Is everyone so tight with a sense of humor, or just put a stake in the film just because it is Russian, especially from the studio “Enjoy movies”? Yes, this studio sometimes shot absolutely incompetent film garbage, but this is not the case. For those who shout about “nasty, vulgar and debauchery”, I will immediately tell my opinion on this matter in general: there is a difference between stupid vulgarity and outright humor. In the film we are talking about, it is the second. Did you see a vulgarity here? But then why does everyone like "Pies" and "Scarious Movie," which have as much good candid humor as here? It seems that it is only the nationality of the film. Then it makes sense. Ruson-haters are not recommended to watch. Elementary - many praise "Macho and nerd", "Intolerable bosses", "Third superfluous", and as it were do not pay attention to the abundance of mat, genius humor and scenes with the use of alcohol and even drugs! And all this is because these films are American, they can do anything, for gentlemen, the law is not written. If we shoot something similar - what are you, what are you, this is a nasty obscenity! I have nothing against the above three comedies - I watched them myself and even revised them, because I liked them very much. In the comedy, which will be discussed, a lot of frank humor, and I admit that sometimes even overly frank – there is a full set of jokes and scenes on the subject of sex, but it looks not disgusting, unlike the parody comedies of Craig Moss, and very funny, cute and naive – albeit in some places too defiant. The heroes of this film are not going to a monastery and live for their own pleasure, but at the same time each of them keeps the bonds of marriage, but can afford to post an indecent photo on Instagram or even arrange a nasty party, after which the “black out” (the consequences of this act in the film were very vulgar, but cheered the whole cinema at my session). One thing is clear - the comedy turned out bright, energetic and really funny.
If everyone who opposes this film was present at the session where I watched it, they would understand that everyone likes the film, not just those who are paid. Nobody paid anyone, in the cinema the whole hall was having fun from beginning to end, and, oddly enough, no one left the cinema, everyone watched until the end, and even sang the final song of everyone’s favorite band “Hands up”. Sergey Zhukov himself, an idol from our childhood, starred here in the role of himself, and his appearance was as if not serious, and in the narcotic “parish” of one of the heroes who took the “fool” with the light hand of his wife during the incessant confrontation between husbands and wives – do you think this is not funny and idiotic? And the whole room laughed to tears! And this despite the fact that there were no schoolchildren in the hall, "thanks" to the restriction to 18 years. They laughed mainly at how three guys did bad things to their girlfriends, and vice versa - humor of this type, as a rule, is almost always funny, the classic animated series Tom and Jerry and Well, wait. Yes, unlike children's cartoons, here it looks very vulgar, but frank jokes so far no one has forbidden. The film is quite dynamic, cheerful, incendiary - is that not enough? I can point out the real oddity here, with a 16-year-long plot hole from the 1999 entanglement to our (at the time) days - maybe it's just an attempt to please the '90s generation who grew up on "Ivanushek" songs. But not the point. It is also commendable that the authors managed to shoot such a beautiful spectacular comedy for a minimal budget (less than two million dollars), and not anywhere, but in Cuba. I was also pleased with the presence of four actors who came to this project from youth series, followed by my youth: Alexander Golovin (" Cadetship), Natalia Rudova and Nastasya Samburskaya ("Univer). New dormitory), Denis Kosyakov ("Love in the area). Roman Yunusov is familiar for his roles in several obscene comedies, the most scandalous of which is the dilogy “What Men Do” produced by the same trampled studio. “Comedy Woman” has never watched, so Maria Kravchenko has never seen before or after it. This team gathered to show how three young couples quarreled from scratch and began to plot each other. The viewer is waiting for the most shameless antics of both sides of the “war of the sexes”, the most beautiful landscapes and scenery, as well as dazzling views of a chic party arranged by the guys in the middle of the film. I wonder what's wrong with this? The whole film exudes positivity, except for the stupidity of throwing food at the start of the film and the even more outright stupidity at the end of the battle of the sexes, when it became such in the literal sense of the word “battle”. Of course, the parody of the historical blockbuster came out unseemly - I mean, an imitation of the battle scene, but laughing at the cry of "300 Spartans" Zack Snyder, as I see it, is mentioned by many people - in fact, the phrase went to the people. The episode in the pre-final stages with the Armenian family brought a very kind and instructive morality to the picture. One fact – among my favorite comedies has become one more, and it is worth noting that this is perhaps one of the most high-quality films of the studio “Enjoy movies”, which turned out on the same level as the positive New Year’s comedy “Friends of Friends”, which entertained cinemas in early 2014 (sorry, I did not go to the cinema to that film, but watched at home – they say, the same fun reigned in the cinema halls).
9 out of 10
Golovin again picked up a girl older than himself: in “Cadetship” and its sequel “Kremlin cadets” Elena Zakharova older than him by 13 years, here Natalia Rudova older than him by 5 years. Lucky for his heroes on mature ladies!
P.P.S. When he left the hall, turned on the music in his phone, the headphones sounded the song “Forget everything” at that time megapopular group “Quest pistols”. It’s like a song about this movie, about the relationship between three couples in the spotlight. Especially the phrase "How long have we been on knives ..."
I will not repeat the above, I agree with the reviewers. I can’t say the movie is a failure, no. There are good things about it...
Pros of the film:
1. The saturation of colors, a beautiful background for the film, the sensations of the cube, honeymoon are transmitted, i.e. the atmosphere is transmitted;
2. Selection and play of actors. As it seems to me, the actors coped with their roles, someone better, who (due to their inexperience) is worse, but, in general, remained satisfied;
3. The idea is a perpetual war between men and women, although it is a battered topic, but it has something to reveal, and it is also good that different types of couples have shown (when a woman is stronger than a man’s character; or “two morons are strength”; or the children of rich parents).
4. Armenian family – here and humor, and an example of a normal family, the only one who was pleasant to look at.
I thought about the positives for a long time, but they are over.
Cons:
1. Plot. In some places there were excesses with cruelty or vulgarity, which were presented as humorous moments, far-fetched plot (at the moments of quarrels, the reaction of a Russian person to these quarrels). Maybe it's the only drawback in the movie, but it's too fat and crossed out the pluses. On the one hand, the plot seems to approach an urgent problem that can be ridiculously beaten, there are a couple of steps left, as either the stupidity of the characters according to the script, or stupid humor, so the topic stated in the title of the film is not disclosed. And on the other hand – it is a shame somehow: directors, screenwriters of Russian cinema are likened to jokes overseas, we are not so stupid as to laugh from flat humor, not that the film industry takes us for fools, ready to laugh at vulgarity?
Shame on you fellow writers! Shame!
Let’s get into that splendor right away! In the middle of the film, there is a scene where the main male characters wake up together after a stormy night, and used condoms lie around them. I wish they were just lying around, but one of the characters had a condom stuck to his (sorry) ass. Zombion was never a prude (remember). I watch this scene very carefully and expect humor. They sit on their beds and think they have been raped. What? Oh, my God, that is disgusting vomit. I couldn't resist.
Guys, if you were really raped, you'd know about it, not sit around with stupid faces. You couldn't even sit down! And I know how to joke as well as the creators of this nonsense. You think so? Nope! One of the heroes (Naturally Roman Yunusov) takes this allegedly used condom and tries the liquid from it on his tongue. This is where my patience ran out. What kind of humor? There's no humor in this movie. It is a terror flying on the wings of the night (only the Black Cloak). I can't even imagine that on the big screen. By the way, who gave the go-ahead to this movie in theaters?
The film was rolled by the company "Karoprokat". Your Honor, I have no questions. After all, they rolled the films “Manticora” and “Flower of the devil”. The director is Tair Mammadov. This is probably his debut picture. It’s a familiar face, but it doesn’t matter, but the important thing is that his directorial debut was a nightmare. The film is billed as a comedy, but is actually a horror film. The picture begins with children's photos of the main actors under the song "Poplar Pooh". And that's the best thing about this store, because it's only worse. We'll be introduced to three girls and guys from school together. Later, they will all play a wedding and go to rest, and during the rest will start to build each other dirty tricks.
You've heard of condoms before. There are also grandiose ideas for laughing - to put a piranha in the toilet so that it then bites on the genitals. Remember, these characters are husbands and wives. I don't care if your wife gets taken to the hospital. It's just a joke. At some point, one of the characters calls his beloved girl of easy behavior, but only in a rude form, so that everyone around hears. I’m sitting there and spreading my hands to the side of the outrage. Humor is good, but why did you even get married if you wanted to cripple your soul mate? The director Mammadov has no sense of proportion.
Plus, add humor like throwing food. Mac Sennett is alive! The main characters fight with squid. We're sitting on the same water with a crust of black bread, and they're making fun of it. That's when Charles Chaplin got to Mack's studio, he too threw food. In the tenth years of the 20th century, it was very funny. I understand only one thing that in your film there is no verbal humor, so you take the visual part (there really was one attempt to joke about the men who all as one want to sleep at the wedding with the bride of a friend, the joke flew by), but throw food. Although it is better to throw food than lick condoms.
"Women vs. men" is misery. That’s the truth, because it describes the film perfectly. Forget respect! This film wanted to sneeze at his viewer. There is no normal character in it. Rather, there was an adult couple, but they are not the main characters. And the main characters are pigs! I said that word again. I didn’t care about their relationship the whole movie. Once again, we watched a modern comedy about pigs. I would like to talk about people...
P.S.
God, a Zack Snyder movie parody! You guys know what the best parody of 300 is? Yes, the first ...
Hello, my name is Maxim! And It's so to say kinzo insults my Maximal feelings!!!
The title is not for nothing wrote so, and there are explanations for all this, but about everything in order:
1) The cast - simply put, he is a Star-to-the-head, and they never play (Even the dude from Yeralash and then rolled)!
2) There is the character Maxim (played by his dude from the Duo Camedi ' Sisters Zaitsev'); who for some unknown reasons exposed him as some pervert, a person with an extremely low level of disgust and just some person who is not all right with his head! It hurt my feelings so much that I had nightmares, not a day or two, but more! Looking at this kakbe actor, rest assured - in other films, his role will not change!!
(3) - Is that the plot? Where 3 couples in school fiercely hated each other, after a while they get married in the same day, etc., and during the honeymoon (or just some month) they begin to hate each other even more + revenge such that Stanislavsky would never believe, and any sane person would not believe either!
4) OST (original soundtrack of the film - not remembered! There's nothing to say.
5) The scenery - half of the scenery I was pleased if not ...
There's a whole wagon or two of them. In the frames flashed microphones, for example, holes in the plot and so on. Well, the genre - Comedy I would cross out and write another, not related to the genre of Comedy and humor in general!
Conclusion: Kinzo has no value, under the substances do not even try, Russian worthy kinz, for which there is no pity time and money at the moment chronically lacking! I do not recommend this book to anyone!
1 in 10
Pity Zero, he would be well worth this assessment!
“Women vs. men” or how to shoot another talentless Russian comedy.
So, this masterpiece was presented to us by the famous goyes you are good from ENJOY MOVIES.
In the center of the plot are six young people: the son of rich parents, a loser, a dull and their three ladies, respectively: the mentally insane daughter of other rich parents, the always dissatisfied lady of the heart of a loser and a stupid woman. Hard, but believe me, it is very difficult to name these characters differently. And claims arise not only to the characters, but also to the actors themselves, half of whom (at least half) simply do not have the right to be called such.
At the very beginning, we see them at the prom and immediately understand what kind of unimaginable hell awaits us next, but we continue to look, because faith in the emergence of a successful Russian comedy is strong. Heroes look like a flock of accelerators, and behave the same way. Why not bother to take teenagers to the role of 17-year-olds is a mystery.
From this very moment until the end of the film, we are haunted by a series of the most moronic in its essence pranks and ridiculous, stamped situations claiming to be “ridiculous”.
To describe everything that these people did is too painful, and there will not be enough epithets in the rich Russian language. I will mention only the scene with a condom - I was sick of the film for the first time.
The end of the film is also very expected, but with one huge plus - it still ends.
Reading positive reviews for this masterpiece, I thought only about one thing - is the bulk of the audience so mired in a disgusting movie that they are not able to distinguish good from bad? Calling it a "good comedy," or even a "film for once," just doesn't turn the language.
What is the film “Women vs. Men”? This is a disgusting plot, underplay of actors, terrible soundtracks, lack of semantic load, wasted time, pain, hellish pain when watching and just a bad movie.
Don’t look for meaning and don’t waste time.
Just because of the beautiful image:
It was in the evening, there was nothing to do, nothing foreshadowed trouble and here 'masterpiece' Tair Mammadova. I did not expect anything grandiose from this film, but just thought as if to pass easily and effortlessly time under the summer Russian comedy, in the end, my evening was spoiled, I will begin perhaps in order.
Idea. It seems that the idea to make a film to the director came on vacation in Cuba, so to speak, between the business, in order to earn money and the benefit at hand was the camera, and the cast, who just agreed to participate in the proposed adventure.
Operational work. Here it is at the level of shooting your first morning in elementary school.
Script. There is no desire to write about the script, since the dialogues are very boring, the characters are not disclosed, the plot is weak.
Humor. You will not believe, but it happens that you watch a comedy film, count on humor and jokes, and the whole joke is that this is all there is.
Soundtrack. I don’t remember him now, which is an indicator.
Conclusion. Should I watch this movie? I generally believe that such a movie should be boycotted and not released for rent, and even more so pay money for it. This is not a comedy, but a spit in the face of the viewer, stealing time and money.
My assessment of this creation:
1 in 10
I scored one point just because of the Samburskaya in the swimsuit.
One of the most remarkable domestic comedies of recent times can be safely considered “Women vs. men”. The film was shot primarily to amuse the audience. The plot of the production is simple, however, this does not mean that the film, unlike its genre counterparts, looks primitive. The story revolves around three couples of newlyweds who not only celebrated a joint wedding, but also went on a trip to the same resort. If you think that the sea, the sun and the sand create romance, you are wrong. Our heroes constantly quarrel with each other, do not miss a single mistake and in the end bring the situation to the absurd, opening a real front. Men are against women, and they will not stand by and show what they are capable of. There is no doubt that the resort has never been so hot.
I really liked the cast in this film. Personally, I was most amused by the bickering of Alexander Golovin and Natalia Rudova. They formed an unforgettable tandem. It even seemed as if something more had slipped between them than a duty to the crew. Neither did Roman Yunusov. His appearance in the picture was enough to make him smile. The actors are really good and glad that they did not hesitate to ridicule themselves, getting real pleasure from filming.
In general, I want to note that “Women vs. men” is an hour and a half of great pastime. Successful jokes here will be enough for a few similar pictures, and some of the findings used for pranks, I am ready to use in real life. Well, do not lose the learned information just like that!
What could be better for a newlywed than a honeymoon spent in a hot tropical resort?! Best friends, and even former classmates, believed that the joint wedding should also be a holiday at the resort, and necessarily a big noisy company. Nothing foreshadowed trouble for the heroes, as they prepared to spend unforgettable days sipping cocktails by the pool and strolling under huge palm trees, enjoying the presence of the other half. However, the situation was not as rosy as it seemed at the beginning. Instead of rest, the heroes will get involved in the war of the sexes. Husbands defend the point of view of men, and wives, respectively, women. Every little thing leads to conflict. What began as a vacation has turned into a battle in which it is difficult to determine the winner, as both sides show wonders of ingenuity in terms of jokes and hamstrings, some of which are very dangerous.
"Women vs. Men" is a real summer comedy, with no extra details. When you watch such light, airy stories, you involuntarily forget about everything in the world and laugh at every hilarious scene, which is scattered here in large numbers, which cannot but rejoice. What I liked about the film was that the creators actually had fun during the filming, and a similar holiday atmosphere was conveyed to Women vs. Men at its best. So if you want to be guaranteed to cheer up, I recommend this movie without unnecessary prefaces.
8 out of 10
This film can be evaluated in two coordinate systems: in comparison with other films in general (including foreign) and in comparison with Russian creations (excluding a good movie, for example, from the "Quartet I", which can be safely put on a par with Western films). In the first case, “Women vs. Men” is not a film, there is nothing to talk about and evaluate. In the second case, it was not the worst movie – much better than the absolutely absurd “What Men Do”. Somewhere in the same universe as "Legok in the Word." And if the latter is taken for 10, then “Women vs. men” will pull points by 5-6.
What did you like? A good, good picture - the film will be pleasant to watch in the cold winter, when there is not enough solar heat. It is noteworthy that the film “War of the Sexes”, which tried to exploit exactly the same feelings, for some reason did not cause warm impressions. You need to be able to create an atmosphere. Many of the jokes had a developmental perspective. Again, the comparison with the “War of the sexes” both opposing sides successfully joined each other – the dominance of one side was not, the story did not slide into the beating of kittens. It's also a plus.
Unfortunately, there is much more bad. First, most jokes are unfunny, and some are disgusting. Second, the parodied scene from "300 Spartans" - it was expected that this will one day be done in Russia, but it has been 8 years - now it looks just silly. I was embarrassed to watch the scene, so much has it lost its relevance over the years. Third, the atmosphere didn't make it. The same "Jungle" - not the most outstanding film - created a much better feeling of hot summer (not to mention the old Soviet "Three plus two" - but here you need to make a discount that the domestic coast is banal closer - it is easier to associate yourself with it and your vacation; if I had a rest every time in Cuba, perhaps the impression would be the opposite).
Fourth, vulgarity – I would not particularly focus on this, because it is expected (just the film is aimed at a certain audience – and, judging by the fees, it is much less than the creators would like, but this, of course, pleases adequate people: the generation of fans of “House 2” did not take place). Rather, here it is necessary to talk not about the fact that jokes below the belt are, but about the fact that they are bad even in their own coordinate system – frankly vulgar, sometimes unpleasant “Third extra” turned out to be a head higher, although he joked about the same, but more subtle and more organically, using intimate topics as pepper, and not trying to leave on this one topic.
Verdict - progress (in comparison with "What men do") is, but work and work.
3 out of 10
What do you not see from idleness, lying in the hospital... I'd rather run a screensaver.
Either I'm a very unlucky person or something goes wrong. Watching domestic films of recent years is scary. Especially comedy. They are like exhibitionists from the world of cinema.
And here's another movie. The first ten minutes are immediately put in a complete stupor. Two three players "Field of Wonders" for idiots. Three guys. Three girls. High school graduates. The former hate the latter. And it's mutual. Which leads to mutual pranks. Change of time plan: they are getting married. And it went, it went, it went. In the game comes sparkling humor from the residents of “Camedi”. Jokes about sexual organs, rape, death.
Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against such humor. I still love watching the same "Don't Threaten South Central." It's a dirty movie, too. In some places, perhaps even more vulgar. But it's done competently. It's not as predictable as this. I wish it was predictable. If only it had been well played, but alas.
The cast is past the box office. You look at those faces and you don't believe them. They try to make it funny and get bored. The characters on the screen laugh, and it looks false and often disgusting. Yes, in my yard Gopnik Vasya laughs more convincingly at the joke, which he himself already tells the fifth time in the evening.
I think it would be an interesting film if they were to take the path from school hate to marriage. Then there would be character development. Then it would be interesting to watch them and to empathize with them. But no. We have what we have (look at the film's fees and budget and see for it)... Although... "Bitter" was harder to watch. I think I’ll give the film a point.
And yes: despite the fact that the band “Hands up” I thoroughly fed up in the nineties, I can’t help but admit that the performance of their song by a quartet of Cuban musicians looks quite tolerable. I'll add another point for that. In sum:
2 out of 10
P.S. I don’t like the movie “300 Spartans”, so for a joke about “the eighth of March” there will be no extra point.
After watching "this," I rushed to a movie search with the hope that "this" failed at the box office and people got smarter. How wrong I was to see that "it" paid off three times and plus advertising.
At that point, I thought, who the hell went to this?! After all, the trailer made it clear that another “comedy” from Anjoy is planned.
Okay, stop burning the chair with fire. Let's go in order.
"Plot"
No word, honestly. Three friends and three friends, these infernal trinities hate each other and constantly play games. Well, as they play, I doubt dipping a penis into a wife's cocktail is a prank. It looks more like a symptom of a disease. Well, if they were blood enemies, but they married each other, having arranged a triple wedding, and the weddings they kind of were for love.
I'm distracted.
After a triple wedding, everyone flies on a wedding trip and begins a bacchanalia of sloumo, jokes over which even kindergarteners will not laugh, screams and clowns.
Seriously, I can't talk about the plot. The dead are either good or nothing.
"Actors"
Our "favourite" TNT guys. Curves, screams, that's it. There's no acting in sight. The scene with hallucinations from a poisonous cactus I still have nightmares.
"Humor"
I am tormented by vague doubts that Russian filmmakers seriously believe that screaming is ridiculous and the louder the actor screams, the more we should laugh. Why did you start talking about screaming and not jokes and gags? I say, there are no jokes or gags here. Just screaming and clowning.
If someone asks me what kind of movie I think is really good, then it will be difficult to answer this question. Because from the early creations of this studio, you can still find something more or less sane. But recently, a solid slag comes out, which is recommended to be burned after viewing.
Plot. Three couples go on a wedding trip to Cuba. There they all quarrel and start doing different things to each other. Now the relationship of the main characters is under serious threat.
The main problem with cinema is that there are no holes in the storyline. It is itself a huge black hole, pulling into itself mother logic. At the beginning we show the graduates of the school in 1999. But we see grown-up uncles in front of us! No, the filmmakers seriously think that 30-year-old men can play schoolboys? Well, Golovin still went anywhere, but here Yunusov and Kosyakov ... it is very strange. In the course of the film, you can see that the relationship between the couples is far from perfect. Then why did you even have to get married? And the most important question is, "How did these people meet for a while?" Throughout screen time, girls behave like women of easy behavior, and guys - like the latest bastards and scumbags. Such characters do not want to empathize. If I had met such people on vacation, I would probably have fallen into depression from the realization that such degenerates exist in the world. To absolutely idiotic situations, you can add a scene with criminals (who cannot be recognized in tights) and a manual metal detector at the exit of the cave (and the reaction of the device to an object that is not metal at all).
Atmosphere. On the screen, everything happens that we have long been accustomed to tapes from "Enjoy". The main characters (the language does not turn to call them actors) crook, shout loudly, call each other names, do various obscene and obscene things, and Roma Yunusov diligently shakes his ugly huge belly to the right and left. As you can see, this is not worth your time. But there is good news: the timing of the picture is only 1 hour 20 minutes along with the credits, and closer to the end of the comedy you will see a whole good joke in the form of a parody of the picture "300 Spartans". You can still see it in the trailer.
Humor. Endless jokes about boobs, pussy, sex and filled condoms will “please” you throughout the film. If you suddenly decide for any reason to watch this masterpiece, my advice to you: enjoy the first 10 minutes of the movie. They are the most harmless, then begins the real bedlam and black.
Music. The musical accompaniment is simply disgusting. It was sad to see among all this garbage song Sergei Zhukov. And he, to be honest, was sad to see in this ugly anti-film.
The studio that gave us this “wonderful” film began to remind me more and more of a knotted alcoholic with shaking, who keeps trying to stop and become a person, but then again breaks down and goes into a long-awaited binge. This is about the same. At the very beginning of the tape there are some glimpses and a hint of good jokes, but after a few minutes we see the usual "Enjoy Movies" in all its glory.
3 out of 10
(26%), someday Mammadov and Andreasyan will learn to make good movies, but it will be a completely different story.
“They’re at the statue of peepee s**t, and we’re morons!” – this phrase could become the slogan of the film.
The overall impression of the film is a nightmare. What was that? Some kind of mess from a camedy club, a camedi vouman and an eralash. I don’t know what the author wanted to convey with this film, but it turned out terrible.
The plot is a strange situation about the fact that the newlyweds begin to quarrel almost at the altar, and, judging by the intensity of passions, how they even reached the wedding – I personally have a big question. And then there is the increase.
Jokes are the comedy already mentioned above. So-called toilet humor. Slutty. In some places, frankly unpleasant. It is strange how a normal person in his right mind and sober memory can come up with such heresy?
Characters/actors. As one heroine of my favorite TV series used to say, “Oh, my God.”
Roman Yunusov is the most reckless and inadequate character from the whole company of newlyweds. I do not like it in gum, nor in the full meter.
Denis Kosyakov - against the background of the others looks more or less normal. I repeat, in the background of the rest, no more.
Alexander Golovin - too much facial expressions plays a cruel joke with him. I feel like I haven't moved away from Eralash yet.
Nastasya Samburskaya - but here, on the contrary, facial expressions are frankly flawed. As in "Univer", for everything that happens in life, the young lady has one expression. Sadly, a nice girl, and the face is like a Gestapo investigator.
Maria Kravchenko - also played in the vouman gum, which makes it seem that this is her character - a bullish hoodie - went on a wedding trip.
Natalia Rudova – in my opinion, her best role was in Tatiana Day. So far, she has failed to outdo herself, at least in this film. There's no character here. Not even one. Nothing.
The only sane thought in the whole film is put into the mouth of a minor character. It is that the family is the most important thing, you can quarrel, reconcile, but the family is above.
In general, you can watch the film only in a very large and fun company in the background. Personally, I am sorry for the time spent.
Here, guys, do not believe it, but coming home today after a hard day’s work and sitting in front of the monitor with hot tea, I realized that I want to see something from “our domestic manufacturer”. In plans, this film was a long time — apparently just for such cases when exotic pull. Therefore, continue to waste time and search did not, stopping your choice on this picture. Immediately before watching, I tuned in to something light, to what extent even meaningless and stupid, in general, no “masterpiece” I did not expect from the film and in sight. In principle, the expectations were justified, and as crazy as it sounds, but I liked the film.
Plot. Well, how do I put it... The storyline is coming through. This is thin, pale, but if you look closely, you can see it. I will not rewrite the abstract or tell it in my own words, because in principle, everything that is written in the description is the whole plot of the film. Nothing supernatural, no drama, everything is very easy and simple. I didn't expect anything more.
Humor. He's in the movie. He's flat, primitive and beaten, but pretty tolerable, a couple of times I smiled and even laughed.
I’ve always been told that I have a great ass and I have to be on my guard. I didn't save you!
Atmosphere. Operator's good. Everything is very beautiful and high quality. Well, of course, bright and colorful Cuba also contributes. And as a young lady, I really liked the dresses of Samburskaya, both wedding and evening. So, the stylists also did a good job overall. In any case, the so-called "interior film" I liked.
Actors. The cast is not bad. Of course, I add Head, Kosyakov, Sambur and Ore. I am neutral towards Yunusov, both in Camedi and in this film, he did not cause absolutely no emotions in me: neither positive nor negative. But Kravchenko... I don’t digest organically given ... oh,, I don’t even turn my tongue, call her an actress. Let it be biased, but this film lost points, to a greater extent, only because Kravchenko was filmed there.
Result: When viewing this film, you need to completely abstract from all the other comedies that you have watched. Do not compare, search for deep meanings or wait for high-quality humor. This is a Russian comedy, and Russia, as sad as it sounds, cannot make films. I was able to shut down and expect some kind of "dummy" without a solid plot and that's probably why I liked the film.
6 out of 10
P.S.: I don’t like Russian cinema! Honestly, I don't like it!
P.P.S.: I think I criticized the whole movie, so why the hell did I like it then? Ugh! A double feeling after watching...
Unfortunately, I cannot say flatteringly about our cinema, but you can discuss such a film as “Women vs. Men”, which by its stupidity and absurdity pulls the general impression of Russian films to the bottom of the Mariana Trench.
“Every man dreams of sleeping with his bride at a friend’s wedding.” The plot is simple, it’s amazing how it managed to stretch this creation for 90 minutes. If you think about the actions of the main characters, you are horrified: blow up the wedding cake, dip your dignity in cocktails of wives. What were the filmmakers thinking? Or, in their opinion, every married couple from time to time is so entertained?
The images of the main characters were written with patterns that are already obliterated to holes: a spender, a near Maxim and a low-paid hard worker spending his honeymoon, buried in a tablet. There is nothing more to add.
If there are people who liked the film, think carefully: Do you also take a chair with you? You also can’t recognize the voice of a loved one who put a woman’s stocking on his head? Maybe you want to make love to a friend’s girlfriend? And how many people, forgetting about any decency, about etiquette will spread food in the restaurant?
I guess not.
The film is definitely not worth the time, it will only make your brain degrade along with the main characters. It is a shame that you rarely see a decent Russian film.
Jesus. Why should I be punished? One of the worst Russian films I have ever seen. I didn't know "Enjoy Movies" before, and thank God. Not everyone can think of that.
The story is quite simple. Three young couples go to Cuba after their wedding. Everyone naturally married for love, but if you look at the behavior of the guys, you get the feeling that there is no love here at all. Everyone insults each other, covers with mat, and mocks in every way. What kind of loving man would dip his eggs in his wife's cocktail? I don't get it. That's where the whole movie goes. Everybody covers for shit. How much advertising there is... I have a good attitude towards advertising in films, but there is so much of it that it seems to me that the campaign itself, which they advertise, does not make as much advertising for themselves as in this film.
The cast. If the story is simple, the actors are even easier. We have selected actors who have ever been associated with humor and comedy in general. But the jokes in these films are not that not funny, they are disgusting and vulgar. Roma Yunusov and Denis Kosyakov probably do not know that they are no longer in the comedy club, but Sasha Golovin. How could he be in this sub-film? The female composition is the same, all associated with humor. Everything about them is the same as about guys.
Screenplay and directing are simply not there.
As a result, I want to say that it is better to have a snack on these 200-400 rubles than to spend them on this subfilm.
Yenjoy has slipped worse than anything... He was always like that, though.
Khmk-khm. The fact that there are people in Russia who like this is absolutely amazing. Of course, this campaign has never been good at making comedies. “Comedies” none of their films are even close. But let’s move on to the film itself. It is taken, as it seems to me, just in haste to make money from such degraded people who watch and love Yenjoy. Where did that 50 million go? Oh, my God, that's terrible!
1. Advertising.
I think those who watched the comedy immediately noticed a huge amount of advertising in it. Seriously, not a minute will pass when one advertisement is replaced by another. It’s so hard to get an eye out.
2. Installation.
I don’t know if anyone noticed, but I definitely did. It's just a shock. I haven’t seen such a poor installation since... Oh, my God, I've never seen that before! I have seen the microphone at least 3 times. Was it possible to reshoot if you saw that the microphone half got into the camera lens?
3. Plot.
There's nothing to say about the plot. Just the four most standard types of people (which, however, are not so common in life):
Fat and stupid, the clerk who does everything for the boss, the son of rich dad, and three “fashionable” chickens. They quarrel on vacation, and begin to take revenge on each other. I'm not going to spoil it.
4. Humor.
No funny joke. Just like that. You think it's funny if someone sneaks into your toilet and... Do his thing without flushing it? It's disgusting and disgusting. Unfortunately, "jokes" of this type - the whole "humor" of the film.
5. Restrictions.
Even for the 18+ limit, the movie is too vulgar.
“Everywhere is shaking everyone, if I may put it that way.”
Result:
A terrible film, completely unthought-out and unworked plot, unnatural play of "actors", not funny jokes, and a huge amount of advertising.
I will try to adequately and logically express my opinion and I want to write that an epiphany has come to me, which I can describe with a slightly revised quote from the movie The Matrix:
Do not try to find the bottom of humor in modern Russian comedies – it is impossible! First, you need to understand the main thing – there is no bottom!
It seems to me that toilet humor is increasingly developing its mass and speed. I just don't understand the ratio - the video series (because the film this creation just conscience does not allow you to call!) every time everything is vulgar, primitive and disgusting, box office fees are less and less, and new video series comes out more and more often!
There is a concept of “norm” – it is relative. That is, the norm is a floating unit that can change its frame and is completely dependent on its acceptance by the majority. That is, if one person says that the Earth is round, but most do not agree – he is burned at the stake! If the majority believes that the demonstration of close-up footage that a normal person will not cause anything but a gag reflex (it is difficult to describe without using spoilers...) is ridiculous, then the norm will bring these shots, and those who will argue that humor is Arkady Raikin, Yuri Nikulin, Roman Kartsev, Mikhail Zhvanetsky ... – these people will become outcasts!
I am only trying to build a logical chain, because logic has never failed and, unfortunately, it is close to suicide today, because what is happening is very difficult to logically analyze and I am not talking about the “movies” themselves (they are clearly for what purpose they are filmed), but about their demand, because there is a demand, and this is beyond logic!
Summarize.
1. Quality, quantity and frequency are independent of demand, as demand falls and quantity and frequency rise!
2. Humor, if before he fit into the category of "sorty", in this case, he failed the bottom of the toilet and made us understand that there is still very deep and there is still where to fall, and most importantly - he will fall!
3. I distinctly remember when the best movie came out, I was like, ‘What’s next?’ In theaters will show how to eat feces!? Today I see my words coming true on the big screen in a way!
4. Vulgar, black humor has its place in the archive of cinema, funny were the jokes well played by wonderful actors, as well as not unimportant was the element of surprise (to joke first!), take the same “Dumb and even dumber”... But in such comedies, there is always a sign and an understanding that such behavior is not the norm! In this case, we see that we are shown, in the opinion of the author, “just fun guys!” Not down! Not moral freaks! And just "people who have fun and "joke", that's just for such behavior in an adequate world these "jolly guys" would be isolated from society in a special correctional institution deprived of all privileges!
5. So far, I am happy that there are more negative reviews than positive ones, but seeing positive reviews, I understand that there are people who liked it and I am horrified to imagine that the prophecy of the film “Idiocracy” can come true, which is increasingly turning from comedy to documentary.
An unexpected nostalgic song in the Cuban arrangement ended with a new film from “Enjoimouvi”, or rather from the newly made director Tair Mammadov. Not only are his own friends and girlfriends filmed in his film, but the movie is also shot like a “home video”, a kind of resort film, mounted by amateurs in a hurry, after a well-spent vacation on the soft blue of the Caribbean Sea. The idea of the whole action is quite transparent and simple, that even by the name of "endjoycomedy" you can notice and catch the meaning of what will happen on the "Island of Liberty" and in what vein will move "like a plot", scenes to which, apparently, were invented on the go, for a glass to another "cubes of libre" or mojito, to the laughter and clatter of all the same actors and actresses, the real comedy was created, as I think, behind the camera turned off, and not in the film itself.
In general, the "bicycle" comrade Mammadov did not invent, as he did not surprise with innovative techniques, camera angles and staged scenes, but made excellent advertising, not only for the homeland of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara, as well as for the tour operator Biblio Globus, which once again proves the mutually beneficial business in our cinema - advertising in which, like flies on excrement. Of course, the actors were depressing, but not infuriating, except perhaps mammoth Roman Yunusov, who from film to film wanders the image of a sloppy. Of course, there were funny moments in the film, but for some reason, while writing this text, I have already forgotten and will not be able to remember now. But most likely, this fact mirrors the titanic work done by the creators of the picture, after watching which one-time laughter, and one-time jokes, and one-time jokes are forgotten, but the face of the ex-sister Zaitsev is not forgotten.
Verdicting "Women vs. men" I raise my hands up for that nostalgic melody and poems, the author of which will also certainly play a cameo in this film, but lower them down, turning my fat finger to the ground, because it is not worth spending time on such a movie, and especially money.
Something like that!
At the time of the release of the film, it had 8 positive reviews, and 0 negative.
“Suddenly they did, and suddenly they did,” I thought, and so I watched this movie. Just note, Enjoy Movies keeps the brand, namely: there is no logic, the plot is transparent, the actions are predictable, humor as well as the logic of what is happening.
The film begins with a demonstration of the not too romantic relationship of three couples who nevertheless get married. the characters as always primitive, this is a rag, a jerk, and a major. Then comes the dull narrative about the confrontation of camps of different sexes.
And if initially the characters were somehow distinguishable among themselves, then in the further development of events they all appear as nasty, hypocritical, lying, stupid, greedy, and capable of anything for the sake of freebie and profit people.
I would like to mention the basics of the film:
1) Acting game
She's gone. Just not. The faces of a well-known channel are absolutely the same crooked, habalat, blaze, themselves scoff at it all, as on this channel, in their own programs.
2) Operating work
You can find a lot of diamonds here. And the curved horizon, and the tilt of the camera, and the fever of the same camera.
(3) Humor. I can say here that humor has a different meaning for everyone. Personally, I do not laugh at any action with feces, a man's sample of someone else's seed, a wild clatter in the camera close-up, and all these wretched jokes at the level of the Camedi Club, the basis of which is always alcohol, drugs, and vulgarity. About a kind of cosplay from the movie "300 Spartans I'm completely silent."
4) The plot. the plot is stupid, without logic, without meaning, completely predictable, and even diluted with these scum for their own profit.
(5) The whole view. Like many people, I liked the picture. The picture is very beautiful, juicy with flowers, views, and landscapes. And when the picture does not climb advertising, so generally enjoy.
In general, I can say that they also cheat and shoot at a low level. It always seems that it is much lower, but once again knock from the bottom. and will be filmed, which is the worst. will be until people stop going to such a "cinema", and carry their money.
You are openly fooled, such films should not be made. I do not recommend the film to anyone.
Comedy is a genre of a work of fiction characterized by a humorous or satirical approach, as well as a type of drama in which the moment of effective conflict or struggle of antagonistic characters is specifically resolved.
Enjoy Movies is a Russian film company that specializes in the production of entertainment films for a wide audience.
I think both of these terms hardly need a presentation. And yet, for the sake of certainty, I preferred to put their definitions at the beginning of the text.
Of course, both Enjoy, comedy and comedy are on different planes and on different sides of the barricades. Sorry. Sometimes you want something new modern. But, you know, Anjoy has one positive function: They repeatedly emphasize the unsurpassed comedy films of Ryazanov and Gaidai.
When watching the "comedy" (without quotation marks it can not be pronounced) I never even smiled. I swear to God, it's a holy truth! Something in a couple of episodes rose from the depths, but it wasn't enough to even squeeze out a crooked grin. And the result of all this ugliness can be expressed in just one exclamation: “Mdaaaa!..” But you can't. We need to talk in detail. There is something good to say.
In principle, the share of modern Russian comedies falls on a fierce illiquid. And “Women vs. Men” is not only no exception, it even seeks to top the list of the smoothest pseudo-satires. And it starts as silly as "The Best Movie" or "All Inclusive!" In principle, do not reproach me, I watched very little of the new domestic slag (which I am glad to admit), and maybe "W vs M" is like something else. But in one respect, most of the adequate viewers will agree with me: “J / M” is like a shaped ugliness.
It started as a duvet tug from the school days of three of our couples. Then they got married and went to rest in Cuba. And if before that they spurred each other with pranks: boys of girls, girls - boys, then on Liberty Island they quarreled in the region. And their enmity with mutual follies and stupidities is probably what should have made the viewer laugh. Show me who laughed and I will tell you who you are.
There's one plus. This movie isn't the worst. He looks good. At least for the sake of being convinced again and again of the total impotence of Russian cinema in this genre. But note: in any of the frames, even such a movie, which no one thought about doing qualitatively, even such a flawed film could be saved at any stage. In fact, if you make yourself a lobotomy, then this film can roll ... for local agriculture.
Actors? These are all Camedi people. "Club", "Woman", "Laughter without rules". And, as for me, in the careers Denis Kosyakov and Natalia Rudova you can put an end.
Alex Golovin is good, but not here. But there was no task for him to play. Or maybe I'm just honoring him. In any case, he will always be able to rehabilitate himself, having played in some film about the Second World War, that is my vision.
A novel by Yunusov? His curves are enough in the Camedi Club. Nastasya Samburskaya and Maria Kravchenko? Their future in this field is vague and uncertain. But the first two (Kosyakov and Rudova) can pack suitcases.
So barricades! The writers should not have stopped. We could have fought until the end, and it would have been better. Let them show the same nonsense, but it would already be better. About two balls. But here I prefer to push more from each film. It's good (yes...bad, actually). I want you to turn on the romcom. But we still have a parody of 300 Spartans here. And the footage is literally nauseating. Released into the air smelly socks (the idea they were supposed to be stinky) cover the sky with a black cloud like a cloud of arrows at King Leonids. The shout of “8 MARTAA!!!” replaced us with “This is SPARTAA!!!”
Imbigilism came to a head when the boys went to get a chair to their wives (and they were divided there: boys live with boys, girls with girls ... without gayness). Two other "bandits" put stockings on their heads and with a pistol (in my opinion, they did not give the move to this moment - where the weapon came from, and what kind of props it is at all) like robbery. It was as if everyone had a missing chromosome. They did not recognize Yunusov’s clothes or voice. The main thing is to squeal. Are you kidding me? It’s like the 99th year of the story!! I mean, they've known each other for a hundred years, and then they didn't know each other?
Marasmus kept getting stronger. Everyone continued to follow each other’s tricks. Every divorce was a surprise to everyone. And the nasty shots did not disappear and continued to cause disgust. At least Anjoy keeps the bar. And the advice Oleg Vereshchagin... And what did he say to Kosyakov at that? When I said, “Call the boss.”
Alexander Chaliapin. God, why are you on television at all?
And in the film, meanwhile, a serious note flashed, but the chord did not work. The tape fell. When the most unfunny participant in the Kamedi project got down to business (I am talking about Tair Mammadov now), it is too naive to wait for something a little bit human. So it turned out that the most adequate people here are the Caucasian family. But Mammadov’s are Armenian Muslims. In general, this is a hollow seam.
Outcome? Mockery movie. The only thing we need is a movie so we know how bad it can be. I'm even turning a blind eye to technical mistakes. The film is a complete failure. The failure that you see and fail with it.
Here’s what happens during and after watching: You're embarrassed. Everything.
2 out of 10
A year ago, "Enjoy Movies" pleased us with a wonderful picture "Bitter! 2", which was really good. After all, only this picture showed Russia as it really is, for which I thank the most talented of all the directors of our time Sarik Andreasyan. And so, "Enjoy Movies" again pleases us with a new film - "Women vs. men." The movie was great!
Let's start with the script. It's pretty good and well designed, thanks to Tair Mammadov. All the details are taken into account and there is no nonsense. I probably wouldn’t be afraid to say he’s perfect. The characters are revealed perfectly and they are really very different from each other. And all these jokes, jokes - everything is good! Speaking of humor, it’s great, sometimes even great! All this enmity between men and women is ridiculous. In some places, very rarely humor is vulgar, but funny still. Applause standing up!
And what to say about the actors - here all picked up well just fine, the star of "Camedi Club" Roman Yunusov, the star of "Cadets" Alexander Golovin, the star of "Univera" Nastasya Samburskaya. All the actors are great, and I may be overreacting, but I think they all need an extra Oscar.
And in the film pleased different references, I think each noticed a very funny, I would say “rusty” reference to the film “300 Spartans”. And after all, the reference is appropriate, because the film of Tair Mammadov really in something can compete with the Spartans!
It’s a great movie, everyone watch! The film turned out great, although this time it was not shot under the leadership of the “great” director Sarik Andreasyan, as it usually happens with the masterpieces of Enjoy Movies. From me, the highest score!
I’m not going to talk too much about the movie. “Women vs. men” is more than detailed in the description to this, because the story is so trivial that it can easily fit into a couple of phrases. The simplicity of the film is not a rare case, and it can not be called a minus because even from the simplest story you can make a masterpiece, the main thing is to know how to fill all that space around the main plot. The creators of this “creation” did not succeed.
Pros: I never loved Alexander Golovin and Natalia Rudova, but I must say that here, compared to all the other “actors” they played best, though “film” it did not save.
Cons: For starters, this is, as I said, the banality of the plot. I haven’t seen a movie about three newly married couples trying to kill each other three days after their wedding. But the banality concerns small things: stereotyped behavior of both men and women, a reference to “Love in the City” and “300 Spartans”, the characters are one of which is a rag, and the other daddy’s son is trying to pull out of his parents as much money as possible, the boss who leaves the main character at work only because he (sorry for the expression) is not “asshole” and so on.
Also, there is just a huge amount of vulgar and flat jokes. I don't mind that, but here they're really low-grade and horribly disgusting, like trying the white viscous liquid out of a condom or wish fulfillment when rubbing the statue's genitals. I don’t know who that would be funny.
As a result, the film turned out to be superficial and somehow inanimate. It feels like watching an absurd theatrical production about the hatred of married couples trying to harm each other by all means and ending with a happy ending. In addition, for me it remained completely incomprehensible to whom this was addressed, I think adequate people do not laugh at the joke “I can go big only in the family seat, but since my hated wife chained him to the toilet, I did it right there” with me agree.
But perhaps the most offensive was that, although it seemed like a comedy, I smiled only once ... when the credits went.
1 out of 10
Absolutely talentless, sloppy, flat, nauseating tape, shot likeness on expensive Hollywood comedy.
I really want in addition to interjections and swear words, somehow objectively explain before you, convey all the pity and baseness of the film, but only general phrases come to mind that cut off all attempts and hopes to find at least something good in the film. Why am I so excited?
Because the action starts in 1999. A gang of bad guys against a gang of bad-mouthed girls, whose war originated back then to the songs of Ivanushki, are annealed and spoiled at the prom. Then the plan changes, and it's kind of like our time and the triple wedding of the same heroes, getting married and smiling. Did it take them 16 years to get married? How old should they be then? Already the 4th decade is being exchanged, and it does not look like an adult uncle and aunt, except for Yunusov of course, but he looked old initially even in a chestnut wig made of pony. First suspicion and beacon to the strangeness of the film. These newly minted elderly newlyweds, having arrived in Cuba after the wedding, swear by finding a stupid reason, and according to the law of the genre, the war of the sexes begins. At first glance, an ordinary, pretty story in support of the saying “cute swear, only laugh.” And they inserted the fight with food under classical music and parody fights, and everything was filmed in the style of a fashion comedy about family quarrels with a single translation of a foreign speech. But all this is negligible and futile compared to what the humor and key scenes emphasized. Jokes are the main weapon of comedy: awkward moments, timely inserted sharpness and even pauses can be funny and necessary. Whoa! Get and swallow through a huge and nasty lump in your throat the lowest and most vulgar interpretation of comedy scenes. The hair on my hands moved from what I saw! I am not afraid to write as is and brand the review spoilers. Absolutely laid-back existence in the film of the words “slut, whore, suck”, (I do not want to write all the dirt here, but if the actors can, then me), said by the characters straight in the face of their wives. Such a natural, easily said vocabulary, and what is ashamed of, all their own. Should it be ironic and smiling? Kozhevnikov’s Dukhlesse wing of enemies with a three-story mat, but it did not cause such dissonance as here in my psyche. Next, the scene with the frame of the male “pumping” and their pseudo-connection. From this scene, we can conclude that all the men who get drunk in clubs, naked and drunk, wake up without panties clearly do not control themselves and their libido, without distinguishing between a man or a woman. Not only are they not even particularly upset about losing their back innocence (to use the language of the characters in the film), they also decided to taste the evidence of night sex. Such a “bleak,” immoral situation should make people smile and giggle? Immorality and homosexuality flourish. Now we are offered to laugh at the current situation and say “well, everything happens.” If anyone is successful, I am sorry.
Thanks to 100% humor below all belts of the world, those ideas and that message to relax and relax were erased and scattered in the wind.
Dead cast from the predictable Enjoy movies. We observe the hardened Comedy participant bald Yunusov, shaking his semi-naked body for two hours, in the company of colleagues on the TNT channel and the sex symbol of 2005 Sasha Golovin.
The end turned out bright and kind: everyone is happy, everyone is “peace”. Only how can you catch your notes of goodness when you shit everything with your own hand? This movie is called What Men 1 and 2 Do. Two boots on a spiritual message. But if in "Men" in the first frames it is clear for whom and why this film was shot, then here the creators decided to pass the poop for a candy, covering such a holy event as a wedding, and let the rental to the delight of the public carrying money.
To watch for the sake of obtaining the most cherished state of “fun” and joy is not ironically recommended, but I advise you to look at how a pure sample of the level of cultural equipment of the viewer, which is counted on by its creators, and draw conclusions.
0 out of 10. First time.
Sexual war is like a sex cloth - the dirt collects itself, and squeezes it out by the one who takes it up.
Seriously, what else can you expect from the residents of the "Camedi Club", but not another pseudo-comedy, claiming to be a cheerful show, but in fact is the most boring imitation of cliches and stereotypes long worn to holes? The debut of Tair Mammadov is not a debut in the usual cinematic sense, when the new director presents his first experience to the audience, how a mother shows her first child to doctors, and they in turn assess his condition, how the public assesses the state of the film. No, don't expect nobility and awe. The debut of Tair Mammadov is a drawn-out video that absorbs everything that we have seen somewhere for a long time and will not be able to see already. To laugh will get only the most unassuming spectators, who laughed at the index finger as a child as crazy.
Recipe from "Camedi Club" - "How to make a typical Russian youth comedy". Of course, at first, a little nostalgia, sunk in the product placement of “Russian radio”, namely, a reference to the end of the last century, when school graduation was not complete without the compositions of the group “Hands up”. However, later the soloist himself will appear here, as Oleg Gazmanov once appeared in Mixed Feelings, but not the essence. We take nostalgia as the basis of the flashback, and then move forward for many years. What's the focus? The wedding, of course the wedding! We didn't have enough "Bitter!" so let's do a triple wedding! This is where husbands give their wives a gift. What gift? Of course, a trip to hot countries! How typical is this typical for ordinary people...
Remember the recently released “Lucky Island”, where Roman Yunusov also starred? Would you like to see something similar? Women bitches and men fools, how funny, how fun! Then the creators suddenly came to their senses that although they pasted the wedding plot into their creation, pigskins did not arrange much at all. So how do we fix this? Let the first quarrel of the “triple newlyweds” be marked by scattering food, and yes, baby, hit your husband with an octopus in the face! And to show it in a slow-motion effect, while the cinema rumbles in the voice, overturning the rags of popcorn.
What's next? This is a war that none of the characters want. Banal nasty things to each other or nasty things to those who hang around and seem happier. How many American family comedies have you seen that happened? Guys rebel against girls, girls take revenge on guys - it's so new, here we have never faced such stories, even though the breasts are tearing. Really? Nevertheless, Tair Mammadov does not stop at the lazy shooting of very worn-out scenes from the series “I hate you, but at night I will come to you from everyone”, and soon we will witness a kind of parody of “300 Spartans”. Zach Snyder.
And the ending -- you know how obvious it is. These comedies always end the same way. However, it is not only in them, and not even in the stamps all the salt and pain. The film is stirred up so mediocre that it is no different from a bunch of its kind. Another domestic summer “gum” with actors who do not play, but struggle to bend, jump, run, hysteria – anything, so long as we do not fall asleep while watching, which in this case is not like time torture and rape of the Soviet classics (sigh of relief), but just to relax the faceless emptiness. Emptiness penetrated here into every crack - in the plot, in the characters, in the scenery, in humor, sometimes claiming to be "toilet", but reaching only to "toilet". Emptiness shamelessly infected the film and all its copies.
No, I don’t mind that the genre of comedy is designed to rest your brains, relax in a cozy chair and unleash the instincts and hormones of happiness. Just don’t hold the viewer for a complete fool. Although... although someone finds “Women vs. men” quite witty and funny cock, which means that such one-day tapes (or “ribbons”, if you like) will continue to be released to the delight of the inhabitants, every summer visiting resorts and non-stop viewing all projects of the TV channel “TNT”.
1 out of 10
Frankly, the film is far from a masterpiece, but you can’t call it “shit.” I do not think that the creators sought to convey to the viewer any meaning, and if I am mistaken, then this is another matter, and my positive review will have to be changed to negative.
So I'll start over... I liked the film, I liked it not because I have nothing to compare it with, I am an experienced viewer, if I may put it that way. I like the selection of actors, the plot is not bad, and everything else is also normal.
There were not one or two funny, or rather rusty moments... yes, they were so that after so many negative reviews, until I watched this film it did not seem that I did not watch quality comedies, I will explain that I saw such films as “Mask, Bruce..., Home Alone, Tight Gyruses, Killing Holidays”, etc. ... and still I had something to blame in this film. The actors, or rather their performance in this film, of course, far from the Oscars, but I think the film is a particularly high-quality game and did not require ...
I would highly recommend this movie!
Strictly and fairly: to make 50 million rubles such a bad movie is a talent. How many more comedies will be released that show absolutely no signs of life? How many more naive people will believe trailers that lure them to watch movies like this? When will the flow of negative reviews of domestic comedies stop? I will give a brief opinion on my negative reaction to the creation of Tair Mammadov "Women vs. men."
In the story, three couples of newlyweds who are familiar from school, got married on the same day and went on a wedding trip to Cuba. But because of an annoying misunderstanding, banal misunderstanding, and also because of human stupidity (to a large extent), boys and girls quarrel, breaking up into two opposing camps: M and Z. From this moment, a series of jokes and pranks begins, aimed at spoiling the rest of your soulmate as much as possible. But I was laughing at not . Humor is incredibly low-grade. Is dipping your genitals in a cocktail a great joke? Does licking condoms make you smile? Is the battle over the toilet chair fun? If so, please take a look at the review!
Endless attempts by residents of Comedy Club to make a comedy in Hollywood, and this time was not crowned with success. Perhaps you should try to make a film without crooked Roman Yunusov? His presence is a black mark for any painting. Can the audience please the absurdity that the actor does? However, Yunusov in the role of Yunusov is a standard situation, given the film “What Men Do!” and “Lucky Island”.
Alexander Golovin and Denis Kosyakov, too, unfortunately, did not differ in full hit in the image. Performers of female roles bribe with their beauty and cuteness, but disappoint by the fact that they are involved in this balaghan, full of frank product placement. By the end, the picture completely goes into the stage of despondency and irrelevant pseudo-morality.
A bad movie that is hard to call a comedy. One ball is put a priori, the second ball - for the picturesque landscapes of Cuba.
2 out of 10
Personally, I really want to laugh when I watch our modern, domestic comedies. But so far, this is extremely rare. Here, for example, there is a script, there are actors, some have been shot before, some work as a comedian on TNT, there is a director, Tair Mammadov, there is some budget, there is a target audience, there is a distribution strategy, but there is no main, no film.
What appears to the viewer as a full-length comedy about school friends on vacation during a joint honeymoon called “Women vs. Men” film, and especially comedy, can not be called. This is not a film, but a set of stupid jokes, and not original, but stolen, brazenly and unceremoniously stolen. The truth of stealing "Women vs. Men" was not enough. For a complete failure, Mammadov’s “cinema masterpiece” also needed a terrible performance of actors. There is not a single character in the film that is played well. What's the quality? There is not a single actor who would play for three.
We can only guess why all this was necessary, for whom, for what it was shot? Perhaps someone wanted to repulse a trip to Cuba, perhaps someone tried to combine the pleasant with the free, or maybe comrade Mammadov just with the director's business is not very familiar, all this is possible, but the result is sad. From this “comedy” I want not to laugh, but to cry. Is this all that our national comedy is capable of? I don't believe that stolen jokes, bad acting, poor script, and cheap sets define our comedy cinema. Moreover, I am sure that we have and still will have good scripts, good actors, producers, directors, perhaps there will be those in TNT who will be ready not to cheat, not to cheat, but to play, and be faithful to cinema as art. And “Women vs. Men” should quickly disappear from the shelves of stores and forget, because this should be forgotten and as soon as possible, otherwise a “heartburn attack” is possible.
Well, comrades Kosyakov, Yunusov, Golovin, Samburskaya, Kravchenko, and Rudova one simple question - are you not ashamed of the judges and lady? Don't you hiccup?
Enjoy Movies is an island of stability in Russian cinema. How many years they all shoot their unassuming comedies, which you can watch once, as they say over a beer, but it is better not to do it. And their new creation, Women vs. Men, is a typical EJ comedy with all its sores.
In the center of the plot are three couples who are in love with the school bench. They are planning a triple wedding and then a triple honeymoon. On vacation between them there is a conflict and a bloody war begins, where no one will give up their principles and will stand to the victorious end for their ideas. And in the finale of the film, we are waiting for an epic battle between the sexes, which will put a bloody end to the eternal question of who is more important than a man or a woman. At least that’s what the filmmakers think. In fact, we have an idiotic comedy, stuffed with unfunny and vulgar jokes, relaxed acting (or rather its absence), beautiful views of another paradise, and a happy ending at the end (where even without it).
The main roles in the film are already familiar faces with TNT, who do not particularly play, they show the images assigned to them in various TV projects. This is mainly true of Roman Yunusov, who looks the same in all films and is already nauseating. Plus flashing here and there product placement. It is necessary to show who decided to allocate money for this comedy.
For a long time to describe all the “charms” of this film is absolutely not desirable. The only thought that comes up while watching this comedy is: When will it finally end?
I watched this "funny" comedy. The first thing that struck me was the quality of the film. Yes, sometimes the picture is aligned, and sometimes tears of pain and anguish came to my eyes. About this stage production, oh this chromakei. I’ll say “green” you will notice immediately. The hands of the operator sometimes shake quite noticeable! Watch the scene of throwing food.
What makes comedy a comedy? These are usually funny jokes, funny situations. But not in Russian comedies! Drugs, drunkenness and others like them. And, of course, rust right into the shot. That’s what makes an interesting comedy! Well, set-ups and revenge is the main engine of anything in this "comedy"
Idea. The idea is not new, and I've seen it somewhere before. Everything repeats itself.
Sponsors. Do not count the number of sponsors in the film. Product-placement climbs out of every gap and hole in the plot of this film.