What does this movie teach you? Whether it is wrong to kill, or that love can correct anyone, even the most notorious bandit. But the trick is that someone who has tasted blood and the high of murder will not be able to improve in this life. No one will forbid him to love and do something good, but the craving for crimes will remain. He can change his victims and give his earnings to charity, but I don’t think he can completely turn into an honest person. My view is largely based on the fact that out-of-jail criminals get there again and again. On the one hand, because society does not accept them and stigmatizes them with the words criminal, murderer and others. On the other hand, because there are so many temptations in our lives and we often cannot resist them. But the filmmakers thought otherwise or simply decided to create another false story with a happy ending, and at the same time earn money. I can’t imagine how Yash Raj Films could produce such a second-rate film and how an actor like Govinda was lured into it.
On the one hand, the plot is as old as the world: a guy named Dev falls in love and, seeing the mutual sympathy of Disha, decides to change his job, but the leader of the mafia did not like it. But on the other hand, there is no traditional mafia persecution of the protagonist. Rather, it seems that the leader of the mafia himself wanted his pupils to change their occupation, and at the same time remove an annoying assistant who always wanted to get a murder mission, and perhaps leave this world himself, but not as a cowardly suicide, but who fell at the hand of another mafia. As for me, the plot is inconsistent, incomprehensible, sliced and implausible. Although every parent, whether he is real or adopted, has invested his soul in the children brought up and always wants the best for them. Perhaps the authors wanted to demonstrate how parental love and devotion interact with such a dirty business as the mafia, in which beloved pupils interfere. If this idea is true, then it seems to me that it is almost completely undiscovered, and all the attention in the picture is paid to something incomprehensible.
The jokes in the film are quite small. And the ones that are terribly flat and not funny.
I’d rather be silent about acting, because I don’t see any point in talking about trying to play well in such a rough and bad plot. I will only note that Govinda tried his best to brighten up all the negativity of his hero and show him from the positive side. The result is a character that is hard to say positive or negative about. I sincerely regret that his character is so small in the film and the authors did not try to fully reveal the character of this character.
The music in the film is not bad, but I do not remember a single melody.
Summing up, I would like to say that the film turned out boring and drawn out. If Govinda hadn’t been in this movie, I wouldn’t have seen it the way it is. This idea could be revealed in another way, while making the film more realistic and paying a little more attention to the character of Govinda.