A chic ending to a chic story I don't understand the criticism of Spahn's film series. Yes, they are peculiar, but not slag. The creators show the life of the British ghetto as they see it. Yes, there's a lot of violence and sex, but isn't that true in real life? The plausibility of the picture is only in the plus of this story.
Once I missed the release of the third part, I filled the gap:
It's been 10 years since Sam framed Uncle Trif. He started a family, leads a quiet and measured life. His brother became a musician and during one of his performances an attempt was made on him. A note was found at the scene of the assassination intended for Sam. Someone is desperate for Sam's death.
Quite often, a technique is used where the negative character becomes positive in the sequel. So it was with Yuri Boyko in the sequel to Undeniable, so it was with the Michaelson family in the spin-off of The Vampire Diaries. Same story in Spahn. Sam in the first part was a very annoying character. I remember waiting for the whole movie to see his face cleaned. But in the second part, which, like the third, was shot just by the performer of the role of Sam Noel Clark, the main character is Sam. After serving 6 years for the murder of the Trif, he wanted to take up his mind, but Trif's friends and uncle Curtis did not give him this. Having dealt with them, he changed, but the past catches up with him. Clarke showed very well in the film that even a person burning with a desire for revenge can act like a man, not a wolf, chewing the throat of an abuser.
The atmosphere in the film is amazing. I love every part of this story. The way the creators showed this dark side of life in the UK. I watched the movie and enjoyed what I saw. Because I was looking at real life, not Hollywood. British cinema is different from American cinema. They get everything more real - fights, emotions, pain, even sex.
I think Clarke finished the story very well. Many people criticized him, saying that he should have stopped at the second part. But what's wrong with the movie? One of the criteria for evaluating a movie for me is how easy it was to watch the movie. For me, those 104 minutes flew unnoticed. It is a very exciting film, as is the whole story.
I won’t even go through the actors personally, everyone played exactly as they should. Noel Clarke himself was particularly good. Rage, love, pain - all the emotions on the face and everything is very plausible. As a director, he also proved himself great, and he is also a producer and writer.
A good, believable film, not for family viewing of course, but the film is worth watching. If you haven’t seen the previous two, watch the whole story. A very interesting story about love, friendship, revenge and pain.
9 out of 10