In my youth I watched this film on computer and for free, I did not understand the cinema then, so I did not care what quality it was, all this was not close to me and I had not yet learned to worry about the deplorable state of cinema. It seemed to me then that it was just some low-budget youth comedy with a deliberately ridiculous
more
In my youth I watched this film on computer and for free, I did not understand the cinema then, so I did not care what quality it was, all this was not close to me and I had not yet learned to worry about the deplorable state of cinema. It seemed to me then that it was just some low-budget youth comedy with a deliberately ridiculous witch-villain, kinzo mostly for girls aged 15-20, going through the search for themselves. I thought someone might need it... It wasn’t until a few years later that I found out that it kind of meant the DC and the Cat Woman that Batman spired. And what a pattern break it was. Because looking at this, it is impossible to even guess what DC meant, there is not a single detail in general: neither the name of the heroine, nor appearance, nor costume, nor history – nothing reminds the viewer of what he is actually watching. A few years later I revisited the film. He deserves all his Golden Raspberries. It doesn't look like a blockbuster, it looks like a parody of it. There are such films as Dragonfly and Spider-Man. That's where it goes. And if the story of the heroine herself somehow can be taken simply for sweetness, then the villain openly poisoning the world with magical cosmetics is already a frank thrash. Her plan makes no sense, could not work, she could be stopped by stupid cops and the court, in this story, an incredible hero is simply not needed. Amazingly, for decades, films about inhumane evil corporations that are not interested in anything but money continue to be made, and all this is colorfully condemned, but these films are made by these corporations themselves.
|