When history was interesting, it was possible to detach a bit from the political agenda, especially since artistic fiction was quite well embedded in history, creating an alternative story, I do not consider such a fiction especially terrible if it does not try to refer to the real story, replace concepts or draw parallels. By the
more
When history was interesting, it was possible to detach a bit from the political agenda, especially since artistic fiction was quite well embedded in history, creating an alternative story, I do not consider such a fiction especially terrible if it does not try to refer to the real story, replace concepts or draw parallels. By the end, the truth began again these amazing stories with “reported on you”, well, not so it worked ... and then for the little things went. But the plot is still interesting. But in the second half, the second season, when the plot ceased to be interesting all of a sudden, these little things that were previously possible to ignore, began to seriously catch the eye, because there was nothing else to look at. And many have broken the logic of behavior and characters or their sudden change without explanation. Plotkin’s storyline generally looks built-in purely for a political agenda.
|