Why?
A necromantic is not an art, and I cannot be dissuaded from that. This is a sick fantasy of a no less sick person + and his unobjective confidence in his own talent or genius, only this can explain how he decided to release such a slag on the screen. Nasty, nauseous, pointless. What can a movie like this teach you? Who is his potential viewer? Necrophiles? Thanks, it's not for me. I didn't even experience a noble cultural shock. There are films that are beautiful in their ugliness (see "The Living Dead"), but "Necromantic" is just pathology, friends.
I didn’t look at it and removed both parts of the masterpiece without even looking at the second. What assessments can we talk about here? Below the baseboard.
Original