Very weak for Marvel cartoon, completely taken out of context, not consistent with the image of the Hulk in other sources and his biography. The case when they are removed not even within the framework of consumer goods, but simply because somewhere the project has fallen down and it is necessary to remove it.
The cartoon is of course a children's cartoon, an adult has nothing to watch here. I would say that it is predictable, but there is almost nothing to predict in the film - only two turns, both times when the good was bad. The lion's share of the plot is devoted simply to how the Hulk hits enemies in the face. It hits hard, big. That's your story. And the actions of some characters are plunged into face palms, for example, the king so naively tells his bodyguard (the strongest warrior on the planet) that he deliberately destroyed her entire family and village to reveal her abilities. Is he seriously suggesting that she should not break his neck after that? One reason why she wouldn't? There was no such thing, the end of the dictator. The Hulk himself was always an image of uncontrollable anger, he could barely talk, and then he was made a full-fledged character, normal on the head. How? It just replaced one character with another.
This cartoon has only one saving feature - the cockroach poet Mick. A really interesting character, he attracts by the fact that he is weak, but every time he does things that no one expected from him. Except for Mick, I don't give a one-man cartoon.
It is noteworthy that a few years later the film “Thor 3” was released, in which the plot about the Torah takes place only at the beginning and at the end, and the whole hefty middle is a film adaptation of the same plot that is here. But you know what? Even in the cartoon, it’s all more serious, whereas the movie is the stinking shapito that ended my last trust in Marvel that year.