When the film was new and advertised, I thought much more about the fate of the entire civilization, but it turned out to be a local story of one guy in the style of “running man”. This is not that bad, but the use of such a grandiose historical setting as scenery for a banal worn-out plot looks not particularly justified.
However, there is an unusual shift in accents in the film: it uses the template “gradually dying team”, but this team is the villains, which causes a noticeable slide of the main role on their leader, and he even invested some positive features: courage, care for his son. The original hero begins to perform the role of a kind of alien in the jungle. It turned out to be a horror story.
There are oddities of camera work - the quality of the shooting is not that bad, but clearly gives a camera naturalists, which is filmed safaris or programs like "In the world of animals", it qualitatively takes flat scenes, general plans, but on portraits gives household clumsiness, and on fast movement does smear. Save money on equipment?
And historians don't like this movie. I watched the scenes, but not really into them. Some say that a fairy-tale country with an immense level of cruelty is shown, others explain that it is shown in the period of its extinction. At the same time there are completely primitive tribes and a relative civilization with the city. Here you need to study the topic in order to understand, but the fact of discontent of historians I have fixed. I leave it to the experts.