A controversial film, ambiguous. You can write a dissertation on it, lay out everything for and against, to the substitution of concepts, the false identification of faith and the church, where you can ridicule the fanaticism of believers, the mercantileness of the priests, but at the same time be ready to dance in a mask with a diamond.
more
A controversial film, ambiguous. You can write a dissertation on it, lay out everything for and against, to the substitution of concepts, the false identification of faith and the church, where you can ridicule the fanaticism of believers, the mercantileness of the priests, but at the same time be ready to dance in a mask with a diamond. If only I could... If there is no result, there is no faith. Where did it come from? did not teach... An ironic movie about a bigoted grandmother? Alas, no. But! The viewer is godlessly lied to. No abode will take a novice mother who has abandoned a child. With the baby, yes, they will. The character of a father without faith is false. He lived in the family, believed, and then “became aware” and left. And left your disabled daughter? And everything is so "decent" in the plot. Mother's character: suspiciously "overshoes" when the money came in. In reality, I'd rather pretend. Faith is the other way. Here's the drunken monologue real, though disgusting. This is the reasoning of cattle, not man. You're gonna get him high! And toss the glass over. I cried, drank and ... came to life! That's it? Yes! For this is his life, his rule and his limit. The basis of any film is the text expressed by monologues, dialogues, images, etc. And when the viewer is lied to, the whole movie is in the trumpet.
|