The issues that were before the denouement disappeared, losing their relevance. Who are they, and what is their fate?
I don’t welcome mental abnormalities in films, but my assessment is dictated not so much by this fact as by the script as a whole. Is it possible to consider the main part informative after such an ending? I find it
more
The issues that were before the denouement disappeared, losing their relevance. Who are they, and what is their fate? I don’t welcome mental abnormalities in films, but my assessment is dictated not so much by this fact as by the script as a whole. Is it possible to consider the main part informative after such an ending? I find it difficult to answer in the affirmative. And yes and no. But it definitely needs to be evaluated. I don’t know how the others did it and will do it, I’m personally disconnected from the last few minutes. I absolutely didn't like it. The task was to torture, and torture in such a way as to cause maximum suffering. But as we can see, torture is not such torture (unlike other films with the same semantic load). In moral terms, of course, we managed to get even. Physically, that's not enough. As far as confession is concerned, neither. And if you take everything in the complex, then an assortment came out, multicomponent, fitting only 90 minutes. Neither slow nor dynamic, but the action does not stand still.
|