Lizzie Batal took the knife? The evidence against Liz is only circumstantial, from which you should understand the strategy in the prosecutor's film - to bring Liz out of emotional balance, which will create the necessary negative image for the jury. That's the main intrigue, not who killed Flora. The same applies to Liz's father - appreciate how the prosecutor calls the video scandal "the main event in Liz's life" (a value judgment of a woman who puts her reputation, her image of decency first in a woman's life), and the father barely restrains himself, but still answers that the prosecutor's words are her interpretation (and we, they say, now don't care if our daughter is a whore or not - she is not judged for this).
In general, after watching it, curious thoughts arise about how promiscuous sexual relations (and did they actually happen - or did Liz just create this image of a girl with reduced social responsibility?) can become a kind of alibi (yes, I slept with everyone and my genetic material is everywhere, so this is not proof that I killed any of them). Yes, of course, let’s be careful with this topic, it is very personal, it is not easy for her to admit it, the jury thinks. Would you rather believe that she slept with Flora (the accused version), or that she killed her (the prosecutor’s version), because circumstantial evidence supports both versions?
6 out of 10
Original