The first half of the film is absolutely fascinating: the right words, beautiful landscapes. But starting from the second half, the authors include a vehement anti-Soviet position.
Learned a lot. For example, the “first concentration camp” was opened on Solovki. The first thing that came out of it was others. The Bolsheviks established
more
The first half of the film is absolutely fascinating: the right words, beautiful landscapes. But starting from the second half, the authors include a vehement anti-Soviet position. Learned a lot. For example, the “first concentration camp” was opened on Solovki. The first thing that came out of it was others. The Bolsheviks established concentration camps much earlier than Hitler. That is, if not a great evil, then quite comparable. And this, by the way, already fits under the article on the equalization of Bolshevism and fascism. Here it becomes clear the choice of soundtrack for the film, which raised questions in the first half. Interestingly, the authors do not ask the question, how many monasteries would there be in Russia and who would work and live in them if the “bloody tyrant” Stalin had not carried out rapid industrialization and prepared the country for war? Are the authors sure that Hitler would have left the monasteries to the monks if the Soviet people had been defeated? An ordinary liberal agenda has been worked out. But, unfortunately, life proves more and more often the formula "anti-Soviet = Russophobe".
|