A film that was originally built around beautiful girls and the highest level of dance. There's nothing else in it. I could appreciate the film for one dance, but the actress performs them not by herself, for her works a whole bunch of doubles with completely different bodies. For comparison - in the film "Dancer" the actress herself plays, she dances, she also communicates in sign language, and she does not need other people's crutches. And with doubles, any passerby can get the main role in the film about dancing. In addition, all these dances are mounted from tiny pieces of a few seconds, and do not represent a real choreographic number. At the end of the film, when the "heroine" makes a turntable on her head, it is generally a muscular, badly shaved man. Words cannot express what a humiliation this is for the film. The authors themselves wrote that no woman can do this. Why did they show such a scene? They didn't believe it themselves. Thus, the whole plus about dancing is leveled completely.
Now for the story. The film seems to be about a strong woman who knows how to be a harsh welder during the day and an ardent dancer at night, but this message immediately ends, because she just sleeps with her boss, stepping on her own principle not to do it. And he's a divorcee, a rag, and twice her age. Once again, they made a film about a woman, but nothing came out of her except an appendix to a man. For all her skill, she is afraid to go to the choreographic commission, crying to the shepherd, needs motivation from outsiders. And the authors did not even draw a psychological line about overcoming her complex, instead the girl only hysterics and claps her eyes. Without her man, she wouldn't even be in this interview. What's the message of the movie? “Even if you have talent, without bed with your boss, you still won’t get anywhere?”
The penultimate scene of the film is the worst character motivational speech I have ever heard. "I used to buy a lot of dresses, and then I stopped, okay, we gotta go." I wouldn’t have invented a more disgusting monologue in a place where the Glavhero should be supported.
The only thing I found interesting about the film was a side story about a comedian cook and a stripper waitress. But it takes little time, and it's not open enough. I also liked the short scene with the controller. That's it! There are no real antiheroes, there are no real problems, the girl is a walking complex, the man is a rag, there is no emotional tension in the film, he has no plot structure at all, instead of it just a set of scenes, most of which could go in any order.
What a translation. As was always the case until around 2005, our translators didn’t know the language they were translating, and they were just coming up with some text from themselves. The question at the restaurant is "How's the lobster?" and the answer is "Sucks." Translated "Delicious." We need to make sure that there are no translators.