The first part, only under a different angle If the American film hit, loved by the general public, comes a sequel, but not for cinemas, and for release on video, or for TV, then even if you are among the fans of the first part, you should not immediately rejoice: video sequel can disappoint not only the unfamiliar team of actors, but also a talentless script, as well as a poor picture. In this case, the latter did not fail - the film is shot as beautifully as the first part, despite the difference in budget, but the plot of the sequel is not only inferior to the plot of the first part - it simulates it, showing other events, but absolutely the same inclination.
If in the first part, a student sued a teacher for rape, which he did not commit, and the court revealed the most curious details of their relationship, after which one extremely unexpected circumstance turned out, then everything happens exactly the same, only instead of a lawsuit for abuse, we see how the girl claims her rights to the inheritance of the deceased father of her half-sister - and again "playing to the public" - an image of hatred, unwillingness to recognize the girl as a sister and share the inheritance with her ... then the secret is revealed. The film, by the way, is really good, although far from a masterpiece, and is inferior to the first part in the number of plot twists. But here this good is also enough, there is something to be surprised when the true plans of various negative characters are revealed during the film, and there are no positive ones at all. If you read the plot description in Wikipedia, you can see that the plots of both parts are identical, but in the sequel fewer significant events. Well, what irritates me personally is the use of idiotic tricks that are used in horror films - sharp effects, about and without reason. In any ordinary thriller, whose task is not to scare, but to interest, this is not allowed. Perhaps for the authors it was such a “chip”, which should have made at least some difference in the second part from the first. Here even the erotic scene after the disclosure of the first mystery is the same as in the first "Wildness". Well, at least I was interested in watching this part, but the third and fourth disappointing, there is absolutely nothing to look at (not in terms of the picture - in this they tried, but in terms of incompetence of the plot). The second part is worth watching only for a change, if there is a desire to complement the impression of the first film ... well, and, probably, to scare something! In contrast to the elegant first part – thriller for once.
6 out of 10