Robbery. Robbery. 12 accomplices is probably an incredible amount. Moreover, the plan is multi-stage, which implies the possibility of error. But, the writers of the crime reject these arguments - we will take risks, nothing complicated.
In other words, the writers of our tape decided to complicate it, which was not too realistic. The robbery was shown for the sake of the robbery itself. What was behind him? What guided the organizers and performers? These important questions have been overlooked.
You may object... Maybe you wanted to make a violent crime movie? Maybe so. But I think it's a mix of styles.
Frankly copying Becker’s Hole, we are shown each stage of the crime, but the identities of the criminals remain hidden. This does not allow you to fully appreciate their risk. At the same time, we get a real melodrama when one of the criminals has a serious relationship with his hostage. A lady doesn’t just try to charm a man, she opens up and tries to emotionally manipulate her opponent. It is funny that in the role of the hapless robber is the master of the roles of the brutishly correct men Franco Interlenga. ..
But it all looks like a dull scripted synthetic. No motive. No tension. No intrigue. Even the appearance on the screen of a grinning and expressive Konstantin Khokhlov (Michel Constantin) does not change anything. The robbery stretches a heavy load on the entire film. But what does that change?
Another uninteresting robbery more. . .
1 out of 10