Home, Hiroshima and Dreams Really? Does this short have a budget of 500 rubles as much as two writers? When watching, it seemed that he shot all one who considers himself to be a horror conceptual and original under-director, constantly praying to the god of art house, if such exists.
It's not clear. There's an atomic bomb going off, there's a man under a bridge who's very scared, and then we're shown a dead bird on a rope (the only picture that's impressive). But this is kind of like the end of a person’s life, consisting of quickly changing scenes, brazenly stolen from somewhere on the Internet, such as “a bird’s-eye view of the night city”. That's it? That's it.
At the same time, the style of the film claims to be an important high-brow parable: everything is in gloomy black and white tones, and the hopelessness of the hero is shown through eating scant canned food. Time to cry, ladies and gentlemen. Boredom.
What was the point with the glasses, huh?
The work of Alexander Gubar is something that cannot be compared with other representatives of the genre. In a bad way.
2 out of 10