Picture of emptiness This film, according to information from the Internet, is declared as an art house. The film is about two model girls posing for the artist in the conditions of a moralizing society, the beginning of the last century. Well, it is, but the rating of the film – 4.1 is not easy. And the review of my red is not easy either.
Don’t get it wrong, the film was made by a terrible fool. Or rather, one particular ineptitude is one Maxim Ford. He's a director, he's a screenwriter, he's a cameraman ... and then he really tried. Otherwise, this film is a vivid example of how not to make films.
The plot is as follows – I understand the 20s, most likely southeastern Poland (at least the film mentions the city of Lviv... although the action may take place before the First World War, in Austria-Hungary). A young lady returns to her home village after being expelled from the university. You think she's upset about that? No, of course not. You should go to the lake with your friend to bathe naked and have lesbian sex. And that's the whole movie. That is, the actions are not explained. The dialogues are completely cardboard. People don't talk like that in life. People don't do that in life. The fact is that the film is erotic, and there is a huge amount of relevant content in it. And it's really beautiful, except it looks completely drawn by the ears. Characteristics are not disclosed. Because of this, you just look at the beautiful but empty torsoes on the screen. It is not clear why the main character behaves like a lustful nymphomaniac, despite the fact that she grew up in a moralistic religious environment. For example, in the film Emmanuel, the main character led a promiscuous sex life because she explored her sexuality. In the movie "Greek fig tree" the heroine just liked to have sex. And here’s what?. survived, I cite as an example already weak, in script terms, films ... I mean, you know how bad this movie is. It's just that the artistic component of this film is so weak that it's not much different than pornography.
Let’s be honest, the film was made only to show almost all the actresses naked. The film did not pursue any other goals. Is that what he's talking about? Models? Fuck it! It's a nude-only theme. The condemnation of moralism? That's not there either. There's just a few fucking believers in the whole village, and the rest of them just tolerate them. That's what they put up with, because nobody's going to say anything about the whole movie. The plot lines between the erotic scenes are so weak that they border on the same pornography. And since all these weak storylines are mixed with really beautiful erotic scenes shot in a clip style, it seems to me that initially they shot just a series of erotic clips, and shot so much that they decided to finish the plot lines, and make a film out of this. The acting is just awful. Especially “pleased” known in narrow circles porn actress Taylor Sands, who almost the entire film, regardless of the situation, just smiled like a fool.
The rating of 4.1 in this film is well deserved. It seems to me that at least one ball was given to him for showing beautiful naked girls in detail and in all possible angles. The artistic value of this film is doubtful. If you want to watch 70 minutes of dull drama, most of which several actresses will show on camera their charms, then this film is your obvious choice. If you want to see a good movie with a thoughtful script, and live characters, then this is clearly not your client.
4 out of 10