Quite a possible truth. To the viewer who has finished, on a par with the whole country, 8-10, (9-11) classes of the general education school of compulsory secondary education, who had the opportunity to engage in sports, cultural, technical circles - to taste, who still has the opportunity to freely enter the university on the budget, sitting by the electric light, in a separate apartment with central heating, read by dozens or hundreds of books, watching the same number of films, of course, happening on the screen, it seems to be exaggerated to maintain their own patjam 39; Well, of course, where it is evident that previously absolutely disenfranchised, illiterate, living in basements and barracks, young people with all the heat and uncompromising defended the beliefs of the ideology that turned the world around before their eyes, so much so that they and the majority turned out to be full-fledged creators of their lives and even something more, which at this age is also not unimportant! And yes, the vicious resistance of a small stratum of former rulers of life to the victorious ' bull' of course, detached from real life propaganda! And plots from the works of Korolenko, Gorky, Chekhov, Uspensky (not Edward, but Gleb Romanovich), etc. - ' private' cases of RKMP.
And so, from all these incomings, it turns out that what is happening on the screen has a right to exist in terms of conveying the atmosphere in the society of that time, despite all the seeming absurdity of the enthusiasm for a new life from our saturated today, even in 1962, even in 2020. And it should be added that the screenwriters of the film, being contemporaries of the events described by them, were quite capable of conveying their memories in an artistic image, yes, and the production of films on various topics, just during this period overwhelms our cinema, so that the theme is not mainstream, it could well be the choice of the director himself, it is difficult to imagine & #39; Run' with his demonstration of the experiences of fragments of the RKMP, already quite empathically experienced, because the audience in terms of importance in life, culture and education, the majority went far from the first parties;' That is how, forgetting our origins and imagining either noble, or Orthodox, or in general professors of Preobrazhensky, we found ourselves in a position where the above lit. sources are becoming more and more relevant and before the plot of the reviewed film there is still a chasm ahead. . .
7 out of 10