Family polyhedron Have you ever wanted to stop watching everything and stop watching? It's unfortunate that this has happened a lot lately. The modern viewer was fed up with various detective plot twists and author's techniques.
In this serial film, such a desire arose only in the middle, when the action was tied and almost did not move. The exhausted viewer I mentioned above woke up in me and told me to stop, but I decided to give the film a chance. The penultimate series struck an unexpected turn, and now the main character, with whom we fought through all the plot wilds, fell out of the narrative. Despite the originality of the technique, designed, perhaps, to revive the plot and distinguish the film from a series of others like it, this decision of the writers deprived the viewer of the opportunity to understand the intricacies of their creation.
A little lyrical retreat. For each viewer / reader of a detective work, the main character is a guide through the universe of this novel or series. His near companion (Dr. Watson or Captain Hastings, for example) gives the viewer a chance to feel smarter - he is explained banal things and carried through the halls of the mind of the main "investigator".
If we lose the main character, revealing the essence of the existing crime, we will not be so interested in watching the denouement. Depriving, say, Richard Castle of Castle and investigating everything as if nothing had happened would be strange. I would like to ask the writers of such series, who wished to include such a raft-twist in the plot, first think about how this will affect the viewer.
From the positive, I want to note a very good picture - nature as a secondary character plays its role brilliantly.