Yes, it's kind of yes - it seems that everything is done not poorly, qualitatively, and the director's work and camera, and the actors play above all praise - their highly professional work is not to blame. And the plot scenarios are kind of fascinating. But...
How wildly annoying are these ' grand in the bushes' in the form of an Internet genius ready to pull out of his laptop any information - without which the case could not be disclosed. How infuriating these corpses, literally covering the life path of the main character (and not in terms of her professional activities).
And the main character herself - one of the biggest problems of the series - ugly, monstrously boring, uninteresting. Immediately the memory gives Kamenskaya - equally ugly, uninteresting and boring. The result - Kamenskaya - was like a series, forgotten instantly as soon as the series ended. And only because of the uninteresting and boring main character. UG is an unacceptable type of the main character in the series. It loses its attractiveness by at least 50%.
I wanted to cite Shvetsov as an example in ' Mysteries of the investigation' but, alas, she too, very quickly ' bronzed' and turned from an interesting and lively person, a woman, first of all, into a disgusting correct and positive statutory cracker and UG, killing the same series (for a couple with not mummified, unlike Shvetsova, obviously aged other characters).
Here, the same thing happens, and initially. It is very difficult to force yourself to watch the series, only because of the detective story, when those very constants & #39; were swarming in the bushes & #39; and the main character - ugly UG infuriates with each series more and more. Alas.
And yes, it's not a bad thing. . .
On Saturday, May 8, TVC channel presented the 4th season of Anatomy of Murder. As far as I know the genre, it was the last.
When I started watching, I would definitely give a high score to the series. Unbeaten appearance of the heroine. Atypical, not stupid, smart. And a typical handsome Chernyshov (concurrently rich, smart and hacker). Everything is cool, interesting actors in secondary roles (especially Chonishvili remembered). I really wanted to continue.
In general, the 2nd season did not take long. But! He showed us that Evgenia is not primarily a detective, not a professional pathologist, but a woman in love who loses all logical connections and vision of the obvious. To put it mildly, she was a fool. And while the season is delusional, I should also point out that the secondary characters were good. Especially Simonov.
The third season came very soon. I didn’t understand the meaning of it at all. Things are not interesting, the plot is sucked out of the finger. You don't believe characters in principle. The only miracle was how good Fried was.
And here's the final season. And like things interesting (although again, the bike was not invented), well executed (well, good, average), but to turn everything so that the main antagonist Fried ... I don't know, there's a nasty sludge left. Even the wedding at the end did not make up for the internal protest.
Well, the product is out. Characters are surprisingly all played out (though in the latter it is rare). But the feeling was unpleasant. This is a subjective perception.
The main character is an atypical Mary Sue, endowed on the one hand with fantastic luck to be in the center of events and intuitively find solutions to mysterious events and crimes, but on the other hand - without the standard abilities inherent in this type in anything. Conscious endowment by the film authors of the main character with ugly appearance, sloppy hairstyle and tasteless clothes is clearly designed to create a contrast with her ' brilliant analytical abilities'. But this does not take into account the created dissonance: an intelligent woman (seemingly) should understand how poorly she is dressed and combed.
The course of the investigations is outlined by the primitive actions of the employees of the bodies and those who joined them, without any serious research and analysis (how do they find criminals without sweat-fat traces?!) .
In general, nothing remarkable, alas. ..
And the theme of a female detective in recent years, the authors of films-series has become too worn out. We'd settle down.
When I started watching the series, it immediately felt like a caricature of something long known. And at the moment when a certain 'brother'heroes appeared, it dawned on me - it was Agatha Christie's Tuppence! It is an insipid, endlessly rushing from here to there, but for some reason guessing (not immediately) who is the criminal and what is the crime. Unfortunately, as Tuppence Lady Agatha looked like a kind of poorly prescribed hooliganism against the background of Poirot and Miss Marple, as well as Evgenia Vilenovna (poorly pronounced patronymic of the heroine only emphasizes her slight inadequacy) Volkov - only a caricature of ' brilliant pathologist' who knows how to solve crimes.
The main character is frankly ugly, very poorly dressed and sloppy combing (suiters and makeup artists fat minus), not too smart, unacceptably arrogant towards others, shamelessly uses a completely inexplicable weakness to her male characters. The role is written out and played very weakly, in some angles to look at Daria Semenova is simply unpleasant.
The plots of detective stories themselves have one advantage - not long, but at some point it even turns into the opposite - too many names and storylines are trying to cram into a unit of screen time, laziness to achieve plausibility. The entourage is too stylized, a kind of parallel life - luxury villas, luxury cars, glamour. Despite the fact that the intrigue is completely uninteresting, such an overkill with 'beautiful' pictures are annoying.
A little plausibility and charm adds Daniil Spivakovsky in the role of the investigator, a real master, but one in the field is not a warrior, as is known. Colorful episodes have Galina Petrova, Vladimir Steklov, but they have to portray inconclusive characters.
The writer and director were unable to solve the main task of such series - to create a cute, attractive image of a woman who knows how to solve mysteries and seek justice. It didn't work.
I don't really like TV shows. I came across ' The Anatomy of Murder' by accident. And so liked the atmosphere of the film at once that decided to linger and watch a little more. Then a little more. And so it went all day.
The main character is nice. Smart, cute, natural, professional, and at the same time very lively. You want to watch her.
Of course, the condensation of so many events around one person is somewhat far-fetched. But no one is surprised by Miss Marple's adventures, is it? What makes the young pathologist Eugene worse? Especially if she has the deductive powers of Sherlock Holmes.
Love in the film does not spoil the overall impression. Unexpected twists in the plot are surprising, but not shocking, because it is quite possible in real life. But there is always an intrigue that forces the viewer, without stopping, to monitor the continuation of the action.
And the actors are great. Watching this show is like reading a great detective. Not alone.
It’s kind of empty here in the reviews, and suddenly I have something to say.
I came across the series by accident, in search of new works of one actress who is not there. But the desire to look after the discovery of this fact did not disappear, even vice versa. 40 percent is the merit of the operator and artists - the picture is incredibly beautiful, aged, very atmospheric. With music is a great tandem, apparently, because annoying motives I can not remember.
The plot of the detective line worked out quite well. The audience does not climb on the forehead of inconsistencies in the plot, the criminals have adequate, understandable motives, there are no gods from the car at the last minute. Watching the development of the plot is interesting. Although the concentration of events is perhaps embarrassing, it is still strange that all neighbors after each other have become determined to break the law.
But what I really lacked was the discovery of the heroes. The authors of the series laid out before us a number of facts about their past and present, but even in conjunction these facts do not always explain the actions of the characters. As a result, part of the viewing was overshadowed by the feeling that I needed to come up with an excuse for the characters. In their skin do not get used to, it is not possible to fully empathize or rejoice - even 80% of the first season there is a feeling that all the actors have their own additional plans, and what is happening is an attempt to fool the viewer.
If the characters had been worked out, it would have been 10/10. It's only 6.5.
