I still want to believe in such a fairy tale, but it is already becoming more difficult.
Continuation of the work of the same name. For the film “365” days I have already written my emotional review, it’s time to continue.
I thought the first part was the end. Sad ending. I even cried out from grief and injustice.
There is a continuation here.
They still have the same love, but it is intertwined with her personal grief. I won't spoil it.
In its absurdity, the second part begins to surpass the first, but the beauty of the picture is not inferior to the word at all. What is important, in the plot weaves another luxurious man who doubles the beauty of this picture. It is such a cliché that gardeners in rich houses have a chic appearance. For some reason I immediately remembered a plot from Sex and the City, where our Charlotte was inflamed with passion for the gardener.
And then he's the same rocker, tattoos, a beautiful top model face. Their meeting was marked by the most stupid dialogue, which was even ridiculous. But again, our task is not to delve into, but to look with our eyes at a beautiful picture.
Again, a cycle of circumstances, unexpected. I mean, from the first minute it was clear that this guy was here for a reason. (The level of absurdity goes up when you find out who the gardener is and you're wondering how he actually got into Massimo's house with a bunch of guards.) . .
Of course, the plot is predictable, primitive, but beautiful.
Here’s what, and the directors managed to keep this vip-focus and high cost.
A visual comparison is made between two gentlemen, the husband of the main character and this gardener with a mystery. And then our heroine begins to compare and compare. A girl knows a lot about beautiful men, I can even understand her. Our gardener, having a beautiful appearance, has at the same time such positive qualities as care, attentiveness, sense of humor.
Once again, a riddle and a mystery chases. Brother Massimo is also in the plot here, let me not spoil here.
And again, our main character dies in this showdown between the families of these bosses. And the ending is fun. . .
In general, let me say this, the second part, although it attracted me as much, left a not so beautiful aftertaste. There is an aftertaste with a taste of delusion. But Nacho drew my attitude to this part.
In short, the film is a 2-hour incoherent string of porn and music videos. Logic, plot, game, plot and denouement are absent.
Now let's get this straight. The first film surprised a little with passion and candor, and, although banal, still left a pleasant impression - at least we saw something new and handsome Michele Morrone. What would you expect from the second? Well, I don't know, at least the sharpness of the plot. But alas.
What's happening on the screen. Our Laura is bored again. The emptiness of her head struck even me, accustomed to the Moscow girls from "The Good Girl" #39. Sex is not enough for her (although it happens once every 5 minutes), attention is little (although Massimo surrounded her with everything that is possible and has already proved his ' love' 33 times, and in general a busy person). Her behavior is more like that of a 15-year-old.
According to the plot, which is solved by the viewer ' thanks to the author's spoiler at the very beginning, Laura escapes to the gardener ' and has already forgotten about her husband with him. And then there's just a sur.
Actors play zero. Perhaps Michele Morrone takes his natural sexuality, but other roles he clearly would not play. I'm not talking about the others. Cheap, tasteless and untalented.
There is an expression ' wasting time' which is great for this film. The 2 hours of the film were like either one solid clip, where the dialogue was a commercial insert, or a porn musical with very poorly selected actors.
Plot. Was he? Laura married Massimo, Massimo married Laura. Happy family life did not last so long, began ' laundry' or rather Laura became cramped and bored. Where to put your proud, nymphomaniac nature, Eh. Then a gardener shows up, then Laura runs off with him, then she dreams and has sex with him. Her husband keeps looking for her. All this to music with minimal dialogue, the longest is probably 2 minutes. Believe me, dialogues '50 shades of gray' are highly intelligent, very meaningful conversations.
Actors. I don't even know how to describe it. Total replay, terrible facial expressions, and if you also watch the original film, then terrible English is added. We could for the American platform ' Netflix' learn the language. However, the main feature of this film is the constantly open mouth of the main character. For 2 hours I wanted to give her a drop in the nose. Maybe someone has breathing problems.
Soundtracks. As in the first film, the second one had good soundtracks. It seems to be the only positive thing.
Over. If you have 2 hours, don’t spend it on this movie! Check out the trailer, that will be enough.
P.S.
After the release of the film, the author of the book Blanca Lipinska received a lot of negative reviews. To which I replied, ' I cut so much money that you can not imagine ' This actually characterizes her relationship to fans, and to his work in general.
P.1.
I will make a reservation right away: I watched this film in order to understand all the jokes from the tictok and get a dose of kringe. The film with both requests coped with "excellent".
What is the plot of this beautiful picture? Bed scenes mixed with inserts from clips. When watching, a cool game came up: drink every time a bed scene begins in the film. I think you can knock out 30 minutes of drinking.
There are very few dialogues in the film, and if there are, they are striking in their absurdity. Laura looks always dissatisfied with a hysterical person, whose head is only lust. Even Massimo on her background looks at times adequate. The secondary heroes are here simply to be and occupy sacred timekeeping minutes. He's not a small guy here for almost two hours. Some movement begins only in the last 20 minutes of the film.
The acting game is weak and does not cause any emotions from the viewer. I think we have a bright contender for the Golden Raspberry Award. For the first part, the main actors did not take it, maybe this time it will be lucky.
2 out of 10
Added another point for the eternal change of heroes sunglasses. That was funny.
Against the backdrop of luxurious mansions, expensive cars and elite alcohol, the cheap love story of Massimo and Laura unfolded. We already knew that from the first movie. And then the contrast appears Nacho, equally courageous, hot and exotic. The exact opposite of the Sicilian.
Nacho appears as a kind of contrast for the heroine to show what normal adequate love should be between a man and a woman. Communication with Nacho helped Laura to see and find herself real, and not just be the most expensive thing in her husband's house.
I read the full trilogy of a Polish writer, and did not react too threateningly to the strange swings of scenes, where any other viewer would remain perplexed. What, how, where and where? Making a film does not require reading all the books of the same name. It's a shame not to read.
It’s very difficult for me to keep my mouth shut, because I know how this will end ' the great ' the love story for the third film. I just hope that the writers will not miss anything, and certainly not change the final!
Of course, I do not predict the future Oscar for this film, and certainly not attributing a profound idea. But it also has its right to exist.
Prepare yourself for Spanish shame in the final. . .
If you think I watched this movie to make a devastating review, it is. After watching the first film, I had absolutely no expectations from this film, and, all the same, I am shocked by what I saw.
Where's the story? Where is the script of the film, where is the plot, climax and denouement? There is absolutely nothing left in this film. If in the first part, despite a lot of shortcomings, you could find the plot, at least. That's Fse. The first 25 minutes of the film we look at not very naturalistic soft porn, and who will withstand it, will wait for at least some articulate dialogue, some emerging plot twist.
But all that we are offered is a secondary product, almost copying the first part: a handsome mafia man on a posh car living in a posh house spends all his time on the protagonist, naturally, falls in love with her. The only difference is that she left, apparently, of her own free will to be imprisoned.
The fact that Blanca Lipinskaya with fantasy is bad, we realized it in the first film, but why do writers get paid? Who is this product designed for? What is its purpose and value? Where is the content of the characters, the plot? All that the film consists of, as, apparently, the brain of its author, is sex, mafia showdowns, balls, parties, outfits, expensive pitchforks and cars. All this is very similar to the clip of a pop star.