Perversion by subpoenas The original 1987 film was wiped to the holes by many video players and Lane created a beautiful erotic thriller. Ideal in terms of drama and timing.
And here we roll out 8 episodes in 50 minutes. The main content of which is boring and long dialogue. Drive is not a word at all. I’m not talking about the fact that the very highlight in the form of bed scenes is filmed simply ineptly. It seems to be somewhere, but in the West they can do it. Or maybe you’ve learned something or something.
Actually, this is a question not only to the authors, but also to the performers. To say that Kaplan and Jackson (very funny, by the way, how he got his hair done as the original character) are not pulled at all and are not suitable for Douglas and Close in sweeps is nothing to say. Well, the first person never impressed me and wildly overrated. A girl can't play passion.
About her, actually. This is what the original source was dedicated to. Passion and self-destruction. What are we being shown here? The authors emphasize that it is the man to blame - he is a family man, punching through the pity of an outsider girl, seducing her well and as a result ... (without spoilers). And the girl is a smart, sensible victim.
What does that mean? A clear agitation, not a work of art. A famous film is taken, the meaning is turned upside down, filled with empty scenes and dialogues, coupled with talentless artists (well, except for Amanda Pete, so to speak) for the sake of the agenda.
This has already been done with 'American Gigolo' where the hero is exposed as a mattress and a stupid Milf-Hunter.
I don't recommend wasting time.