Reviews on movie Voditel-oligarh (9)

Once upon a time there was Timur Baburin (Pavel Priluchny), a rich Buratino who was not used to working, but used to live for his pleasure, have fun and very much liked to make bets. After the death of his father, Timur inherited 85% of the shares of his father’s company, which greatly angered his brother Anton (Alexey Chadov), who plowed in this company as a companion, but as a result received only 15% of the stake. Believing that Timur will ruin everything that his father earned and created with him, Anton, knowing his brother, takes him “on the weak” and pushes him to conclude an unusual bet. He must work a month as a driver for a capricious “star” actress, about whom it is known that she has a bad character, and no personal driver has not stayed at work for more than 2-3 weeks. If Timur survives a month, Anton will sell his brother for half the price of his 15% stake, and if he does not, then accordingly, Timur will part with his controlling stake. Gambling Timur agrees, hoping for his endurance and ingenuity, as well as the help of his loyal team. And his team is a bodyguard Alik (Dmitry Khrustalev) and a personal driver, as well as a hacker and quadcopter operator Igor (Stanislav Duzhnikov). Selected by the external contrast assistants are, frankly, the best that is in this film. Their behavior, jokes, relationships, and just how they look next to Duzhnikov and Khrustalev is already ridiculous. To “star” took him to work, Timur with the help of his team learns her interests and adjusts to her tastes: portrays an intellectual, talks about French cinema, quotes Brodsky’s lines, and for the full picture “rescues” from a robber. "Star" - actress Alexandra Knight is played by Olga Pogodin - the wife of the film director Alexei Pimanov. Timur manages to impress her and she hires him. But will he survive a month as her personal driver?
In general, this movie seemed to me one of many similar films, everything develops according to a template and it is impossible to say that here, for example, P. Priluchny plays some very interesting and original role. It is clear that film producers for the most part follow the path of acting, but Priluchny himself, apparently, is happy to slide along the chosen road, playing different majors and majors. Here his major must for a time and for the sake of profit, step on the throat of his own song and suffer for a while the ridiculous woman who became his boss. The heroine O. Pogodina has a picky and capricious character, does not tolerate objections and of all living creatures, it seems, loves only her cat Nefertiti of the breed Don sphinx. One could expect some, for example, witty dive between the characters and the gradual whipping of passions, so that sparks flew. This is how it was in the Madonna movie Gone. This is certainly not a very similar story because of the difference of situations, but still. But in the "Oligarch Driver" major and sloppy Timur somehow quickly accepts the rules of the game and becomes a compliant and humble driver. What you won't do for money! He obediently deals with the cat-sphynx “skunk”: he takes her cat suits from the dry cleaner, drags the cat in the house-Egyptian pyramid, sits with the hostess in the veterinary clinic. And the new driver-oligarch will have to buy food for the hostess in the supermarket and at the same time not to spend extra money, come to her on demand, even if he is at this time holding an important meeting in his company.
The characters of Timur and Alexandra came out, as for me, too impersonal and stilted. Yes, the scriptwriters added, apparently, touching moments with the children's video on the phone, the father-Egyptologist, but it somehow does not touch everything. Maybe it was necessary to tell a little more about the main characters and add some relevant scenes instead of the completely incomprehensible in the plot and meaning of the scene of the participation of the bodyguard Alik in a mass race blindfolded on cross-country. This sluggish story is revived only in scenes of Timur’s communication with his assistants-subordinates. At the same time, Igor performed by S. Duzhnikov turned out to be the most interesting and charming character in this movie. How cute he is in a men's clothing store, with what expression he carries cat costumes, how ridiculously indignant when Timur is forgotten during a session in a cinema.
Alexandra continues to annoy Timur, but all this happens somehow sluggishly, and then events occur that open the other side of the personality of the capricious “star” and the hero of Priluchny understands that she is not at all what she wants to seem. He learns more about her as a person and a woman, they watch the old movie Hearts of Four together in the cinema and it seems that further events will flow in the traditional vein of a romcom with love, confessions, forgiveness, etc., but then the plot makes a sharp fictitious, such a “horse move” and then a completely different story begins, as if part of some completely different film was attached to this film. And all this brewing porridge with the “Sunflowers” of Van Gogh, “Bitanik”, the investigator, played by Anna Ukolova, Dostoevsky’s audio recording, I can not call otherwise than nonsense. Why director A. Pimanov needed such a move and a sharp change in the genre of the film I do not understand. Apparently, he wanted to surprise and amaze the audience, who began to get bored and fall asleep in the cinema. And I do not understand why throughout the film it was necessary to retouch the face of Olga Pogodina so much. In scenes with natural sunlight, it looks especially creepy, and she with a masked white and yellow face, on which small black eyes stand out brightly, looks like some kind of alien. Yes, Pogodina is older than Priluchny in life, but this age difference is not so critical for partnership in cinema and for their characters to be imbued with mutual sympathy.

In general, this film, as they say, did not come, but caused a feeling of bewilderment. I will not recommend it for viewing.

Without special introductions, we are immediately lowered into the thick of events, saving time to rock the cozy cabin of the ship, which is an easy romantic comedy. The word “romantics” in the title of the review is not accidental, because relationships and love come to the fore here.
Despite the rather rhythmic pace at the beginning, the characters of the film perfectly reveal their characters in the course of the plot development. That’s why we understand what they are and everyone’s motivation.

The main character is Timur Baburin (Pavel Priluchny), the owner of the predominant share of shares of a large family corporation. He likes to have fun, create a furor, but definitely not work. And especially he likes bets, in which, of course, only win, in any legal and illegal way. With another dispute in his life, perhaps fateful, the movie begins. Anton (Alexey Chadov), a business partner of Timur, who received only 15% of the shares of the family enterprise, offers to play a new “game”, according to which Timur needs to get a job as the driver of the famous actress Alexandra Nate (Olga Pogodin) and not become fired in a month. Of course, such a challenge is accepted, and we are already witnessing the main phase of events.

It all begins with an outright dislike of each other, since the characters and interests of the main characters are polarly different. Timur used to live on a broad foot, to be in the public status of a rampant bachelor, surrounded by the attention of girls. Alexandra is fond of the culture of Ancient Egypt, which makes us understand the interior of her apartment, surrounded by a variety of antique things and her Sphinx cat named Nefertiti. But separately, I want to highlight how open and simple the actress is in expressing her feelings to the audience and her surroundings. All this creates a strong contrast in their on-screen duet with Priluchny, so the interest to see the denouement lasts until the very end.

Despite the openness of the heroine, before Timur she restrains herself to the last and tries to hide the secrets that still surface to the plot. The head of a large corporation, and a temporary personal driver Alexandra Nate, as they communicate and get acquainted with her, penetrates the girl and even falls in love. His feelings become one of the turning mechanisms in the film that turn the argument on its head.
The relationship between Timur and Alexandra is a special pleasure when watching, because in a short time we manage and laugh at both, and sympathize with each, and at the very beginning – dislike them for their characteristic features.
All other images are also clear to us, they are thought out, some of them (Khrustalev and Duzhnikov) are funny and sometimes even absurd. Alexey Chadov was able to embody on the screen the image of a cunning careerist who is able to take the most vile steps, just to be in the positive. In fact, his character Anton is a reflection of Timur at the very beginning, but as events unfold, their roles become completely opposite. And, of course, it was nice to see Anna Ukolova in the role of a serious woman investigator, which will never be fooled. Her character will definitely bring everyone to clean water, which happens at the end.
Light, hour and a half comedy, with musical notes straight from France, with the lion's share of love and romance leaves a very positive impression and aftertaste. It does not let you get bored, because on the screen constantly something happens, and all events try to contrast with each other, alternating comedy with personal sadness, romance with composure, and the genre of the picture is constantly changing, sometimes even including elements of a spy action movie.

The name of the comedy “Oligarch Driver” already sounds like an oxymoron. Director Alexei Pimanov focuses on the secular nobility, showing the circles of high society in modern Russia, while addressing simple human qualities. The exposition of the picture begins with a robbery, where the main character in a very unusual manner falls into the hands of the police. What? Why? Where's Ocean? The viewer is left in the dark to focus on flashback in the first act of the narrative.

That's really the authors presented the hero of Pavel Priluchny - Timur Baburin a kind of daredevil, who always takes risks, preferring excitement and victory. We are still given a small idea of Timur’s personality, but his financial situation is quite acutely explained. Corporations, inheritance, competitors-founders - here you can trace the construction of a coherent formula. Only if Tony Stark has everything developed into a superhero action, then Baburin is more realistic. How can you surprise someone who has everything? How can you get him to feel the excitement? The answer is in the title of the painting.

In fact, Alexei Pimanov satirically presents us the story of Mark Twain “The Prince and the Beggar”, only without reshuffling places, and leaves the opposite side in the dark. She is the imperious, strict, serious, ambitious heroine of Olga Pogodina: Alexandra is an actress in the film, who always adheres to her rules and preserves her personal boundaries.

On the one hand, the plot leads us to an ordinary dispute, which according to the classics of melodrama can grow into a beautiful finale; on the other hand, the director bypasses this worn-out path, paying attention to the passion of the main character, his personal interest and the struggle with his prejudices. Baburin here is used to burning through the life of a reveler, and Alexandra is a man of art who keeps her secrets, preserving the image of an uncriminal fortress before the public.
What initially looked like a comedic twist turns out to be a rather pleasant and interesting development. Of course, we can omit the questions of logic, because the character of Priluchny is a famous person in the city, but Olga is a representative of another class, which affects her behavior and manners. The secondary characters that accompany the main character in achieving his goal, Stanislav Duzhnikov and Dmitry Khrustalev, only complement the comedy in this adventure.
Behind the simple childishness in Act II is the understanding and disclosure of characters who spend a lot of time together. A driver who can listen and a woman who can find a listener. A fairly smooth transition will mark the transformation of the characters, when we look at the person as not a public image, but as an open, hidden behind a steel mask, soul. Here is the element of melodrama, which shows that “a person needs a person.”
Of course, comedic stupidities, conventions, ridiculous actions dilute the timekeeping. Without them, there would be no comedy. I liked the joke with the characters Stanislav Duzhnikov and Anna Frolovtseva about the popular TV series about the family. (Artists starred in the series “Crowns”). And the created image of Timur sometimes failed, showing the light the true face, but in general the picture is interesting.

On the opposite side of the adventure is the antagonist Alexei Chadov: Anton is a co-founder of the company together with Timur’s father. Did I mention the Iron Man match? The contrast, which dilutes the fake story, touches on already dangerous and serious topics, but it is calculated. We first laugh, get used to it, then we are interested in the future fate of the characters, and soon we worry about every action. Although with a comedic basis, the director conveys to the viewer an understanding of humanity and romance.
It is the transition in narrative from bitchiness to virtue that is sharp. Gradually develop - timekeeping would not be enough, and here a rapid transformation due to several episodes. Nevertheless, we see Baburin’s comprehension of his actions. The hero evaluates his actions, his plans and his wild life, in order to eventually show what sacrifices his heart can direct.
The climax as if something was missing, the story feels understated, because the most recent act is also an element of excitement, creating an open ending. What if?

Probably, you should immediately make a reservation, yes, cinema may not be great and will not become a new word in cinema, but it is definitely not bad. It would seem that a well-known story about a certain re-education of a rich man, even in the same “Holope” was seen. But here it is all presented differently, very differently. The film is not trying to become a new favorite of the public, it just wants to entertain the audience and attract someone to the cinemas with its absolutely light, summer mood and many familiar faces.
Rich Timur, as if not worried about the future of his father’s company, the heir of which he became, likes all sorts of disputes, often even on what he does not need, and in the course of one of these bets with a companion of the business, he needs to work a month with actress Alexandra Nate, whose character often leaves much to be desired. And that's why it's interesting that two of these different characters meet at this very moment and help each other change.

As for the technical part, everything is at a good level, all installation and operator solutions did not catch the eye, looked organic and did not knock out of the overall narrative. There are many beautiful views of Moscow, whether it is just a view of the buildings at sunset or a mesmerizing view from above of the heroes as they move to their destination.
And if we talk about actors, the duet Priluchny-Pogodin personally for me and specifically in this picture definitely developed. Actress Alexandra Nate (Olga Pogodin) gracefully appears in the picture and immediately shows a peculiar temper. Pavel Priluchny does not seem a mistake, but just a great fit for the role, which is especially emphasized by the colorful duo of his assistants. Dmitry Khrustalev and Stanislav Duzhnikov unexpectedly came together in tandem and became one of the brightest features of the new film, they are more responsible for the comedy part, so they are remembered a little stronger than the main characters. I also want to note the companion of Anton (Alexei Chadov), he is here to some extent even caricatured, but the image was created absolutely correctly, the main negative character in the picture and without some sinister charm there was not.
The result was an imperfect project, going according to all the canons of the genre, but able to surprise its viewer. Again, it seems like everything is so simple done, but at the same time it does not strain and does not let you get bored.

. . Timur is an oligarch who is not the worst! Knows the price, does not give offense, is egocentric, effective and gambled. But overall, it’s pretty harmless. After 8 years he returned to Russia, where there are those who know him and those who do not remember him. But in general, if you look deeper - Timur Baburin is very sweet and touching. (Well, this is if he falls in love, of course ...)

Not forgetting about the above-mentioned word “hazard”, Timur concludes with a competitor/brother bet: he will work as a driver at a crazy movie star for a month – he will withstand this enslaving period – the competitor will get out of the way. Otherwise, Timur for half the price will sell 85% of its shares to a direct competitor.
Could this have happened to anyone? Not a fact at all! But Timur is ALL gambling and having at his disposal round zeros on the account, trying to somehow diversify his “pathetic” and boring existence. This, you will agree, happens and is quite possible. As Russian people, we understand Timur. And from that, with inevitable interest, we continue to watch the movie! .

All the charm and humor of the situation lies not so much in the fact of the change of orientation “oligarch —> driver”, as in the behavior of superstar Alexandra Knight, who hired a pretty driver. After all, in addition to the passion for cats and the status of a cat girl, she does not tolerate rudeness, rudeness, slight sarcasm and bubnezh (and this list can be continued indefinitely!). And what will end the confrontation of the arrogant, but romantic personage - a movie star and descended to mere mortals and warmed up lousy lasagna driver-oligarch - you can find out right now in the cinema, where Pasha Priluchny in the center of the poster, that the plot - and in general - the guy of the world and major!!! ... . . ) /i>

. . The new film Alexey Pimanov is another example of a non-standard story in the classic cut of a romantic comedy. Why unusual? Yes, because you should not expect a cliched plot development from the film! It seems that everything is as always - there is GG not completely correct, but in general good, in general positive. There is an antagonist - also not bad, but still antagonist. And there is a braid for the first stone in the face of a pleasant woman! There is also an assistant team of the oligarch in the person of his favorites Mity Khrustalev and Stanislav Duzhnikov. It is clear that the roles are distributed. But the way Pimanov turns upside down and twists the plot - hears individual applause!! Whatever you say, there is a lot of similarities around, especially in light comedies. But Alexey “gives fire” and intrigue in the development of the storyline, struts on the beautiful lyrical music mind-blowing views of his native Moscow, presents the popular favorite Pasha Priluchny in all its glory, reunites him with Lesha Chadov on the screen again, bows to the popular family sitcom “Voronina”, immerses the picture of the film in an unexpected palette of the past and makes it possible not only to witness... but also to REVIEWEW this story and EXPRESS.
. . It's not just a story... This is a beautiful love story of two wonderful, kind and sensitive people hidden under the outer facet of status and position. This is the love story of the director Pimanov in his favorite hero city. Pimanov’s love for his talented wife. This is our love for the wonderful Pasha Priluchny, who flies here and there and does not cease to please us with his charm, skill and charisma!
... Actually, you know... Watching this movie, I missed the autumn. In romance... For love...

... And watching this tape with people who are pleasant to me on the screen, cute music, beautiful Moscow and warmth emanating from the screen – I understand that the desired autumn, that romance and that love – it is very close! It's worth... just wanting to...

... (become either an oligarch or a driver...) .

A beautiful film!

Recommend!!

9 out of 10

In the last few years, our Russian cinema has made great strides and began to please us with good and high-quality films, even though I have always been skeptical of Russian cinema. Actors also enjoy their performances in films. And, by the way, about the actors, Pavel Priluchny (whom I had only seen in the film “The Elephant” and I liked his game) starred in the title role.
In the same film “Driver-oligarch” directed by Alexei Pimanov, the main male character is Timur Baburin, performed by the aforementioned Pavel Priluchny, who became a millionaire thanks to the inheritance of his father. The main storyline revolves around him, telling how this gambling man got involved in another dispute and tried in every possible way to remain the winner in the end. Quite a colorful character, with not as simple and stumpy character as it seems at the beginning. By the end of the film, he reveals himself in full, showing new features.
The main character of Alexander Nate (Olga Pogodin), on the contrary, at the beginning of the film is very restrained, cold and, for all its beauty, a little even repulsive, will reveal itself by the end of the film and will show itself completely from the other side.
Do not forget about the other characters with their story branches: they also do not stand still, although their development is not as bright as that of Timur and Alexandra, but still noticeable and reveals them in the best light. Except, however, one character - the business partner of the father of the main character Anton (Alexey Chadov), to whom I had an aversion to the continuation of the whole film. But, to be fair, the character is not meaningless. I don’t like him, but his role was to help change the characters. In general, Chadov in the role of such glamorous villains is very good, as Khrustalev and Duzhnikov in the roles of charming and kind assistants of the main character. So I can safely conclude that the casting director worked well.

The film hooked its rather light narrative on very important topics. Someone will be touched by the topic of commercialism, someone will remember themselves and their relationship with their father, and someone clearly will not leave indifferent love line in this film.
The Oligarch Driver met all expectations and more. I liked everything: from the director’s work and editing to sharp phrases in style – “I took the cashier and art. how”, or “Is it not overshadowed?” And yes, this is an easy, at first glance, comedy without low-grade humor, stupid characters and a banal happy ending, but with interesting plot twists and unbanal disclosure of characters. There are no strained curvatures (typical for domestic cinema about a rich and successful life) here, but there is a subtle, appropriate humor. Especially remember the scene with the mother-in-law and her apartment (dialogue, funny and did not go), and with the cat of the main character (coolly filmed the moment of going to the dry cleaners with Khrustalev and Duzhnikov for cat clothes, they are like superheroes go down the corridor to save the world with knitted dresses for a cat in their hands).
As I wrote above, the genre of modern Russian comedy enjoys not the best fame. Abuse of vulgar, scrambled jokes and words, clichés and endless cliches, as well as the incompetent use of quotes and plots of the best Soviet comedies, put film workers in a bad position. Comedies are taken, but, as a rule, the result is deplorable.
The oligarch driver is a rare example of high-quality, original and ironic Russian comedy. Good acting work, pleasant musical accompaniment (especially liked the saxophone), funny humor and simply incredibly beautiful Moscow make the picture an excellent entertainment spectacle. A good product of domestic cinema. In general, moral values are affected so much that the film can even be called instructive, although this is somehow atypical for our modern comedies.
I definitely recommend watching.

The film’s slogan is “Try it out!”, this phrase can be chosen as an epigraph. I have long been waiting for a film with such a wonderful aftertaste, when, after leaving the cinema, you want to walk around your favorite city in the world, in your native Moscow. Moscow, by the way, is simply beautiful: spring-summer, colorful, bright and so warm. Excellent weather, light atmosphere, pleasant music accompany us throughout the picture.
From the first shots, it felt that I would not remain indifferent, because in addition to the main characters, Stanislav Duzhnikov plays here, I have been following the work since the time of Kamenskaya. Actually, caste came out decent. I liked Ukolov in the role of major: strictness, behind which lies a good soul (the episode with feeding a cat is a perfect confirmation of this). As for the main characters, they are in good professional and physical shape. The appearance of Timur Baburin at the beginning of the film was spectacular, the girls should appreciate. The setup is powerful, begins dynamically: Timur’s jump from a helicopter into the water, shots with the girls’ hair flying apart, people falling into the pool immediately force them to get involved in the plot.
At first glance, it seems that everything in the narrative is simple and you can predict the next step, but in fact it is not so simple, there are interesting twists. The main character Timur does not know what work is. He is maximally provided with connections and money of his father, burns his life to the full, spending the capital of his parents and making all sorts of bets (in fact, he jumped into the pool for a reason). But his life changes dramatically when he suddenly receives a huge inheritance. The business partner of his father Anton (Alexey Chadov) is sure that Timur will not do business, but on the contrary, can ruin everything, and therefore offers him an interesting dispute, which the main character cannot refuse, but he can not even imagine how important this dispute will be for him, and all his further decisions are fateful.

No spoilers. The only thing that will not be exactly silent is the spectacular appearance of Pogodina. She is beautiful, reserved, noble, but this is only the external side. It is worth going to the movies to see how her character is revealed and the heroine herself changes. Everything looks good, too.

The actors coped well with the task, very impressive scene in the studio, where the main character talks about her father. “What we have given, we have gained, and what we have regretted, we have lost” (c) is a phrase that has sunk in the heart, because we are indeed sometimes so blind and selfish that we do not see other people around us at all. In general, a lot of the film can be analyzed by quotes.

In the treasury of quality acting, I would add a touching scene from the cinema, where the character Priluchny invites someone to his home, I will not spoil. Good movie. Despite the genre, everyone will find something of their own here, this is not an ordinary passing comedy, although there are really many funny moments. I remember the mother-in-law, who wears with her father’s chair and a cryocam donated to her, Dostoevsky during interrogation as torture.
The film has several successful twists that dramatically change the plot and keep in suspense all the time. The background is beautiful Moscow, unreal sunsets and pleasing wiring from the copter.

9 out of 10

Great movie in its genre.

When you have a lot of money and don’t have to work, you can do almost anything you want – throw parties on a yacht, travel around the world, change girls like boring toys every week. But as for the hero of the new comedy The Oligarch Driver, he has a special passion, namely arguments and bets. And the new challenge will be a big test for him.
So, please get acquainted – Timur Baburin, a forty-year-old burner of life, who has plenty of money and can do whatever he wants. He can even jump out of a helicopter in one of his trunks – who will stop him? That's right, nobody! His father was a successful businessman who gave his son everything he wanted. When the pope died, he bequeathed his entire fortune and 85 percent of Timur’s business, which is not at all suitable for Anton, who works in this company as a manager and once helped Timur’s father build a business. And to get rid of the hated companion, Anton offers Timur a bet.
According to the terms of the bet, Timur must work as a driver for the obstinate actress Alexandra Nate. Not everyone can withstand such serious stress and Timur will step on his throat, clutch his teeth and work until he reaches the deadline stated in the bet, otherwise he will simply be thrown out of business, and even for half the price. It would seem that in fact there is nothing complicated, but the longer Timur works for his employer, the more she drives him and it seems that it is easier to just take everything and quit. However, over time, Timur begins to imbue the actress with sincere sympathies and it turns out that she is not at all as unbearable as she seemed at first.
And now about the cast: Pavel Priluchny looks organically in the image of a reveler who is not going to do something useful, and even in his 40 years continues to burn through his life and have fun to the full program. But the most interesting thing begins when the plot brings him together with the heroine Olga Pogodina. Just imagine yourself in the place of a man who has millions and has to endure the humiliation of some actress. Here the authors turned around in full and forced the main character to go through a real hard labor, which simply cannot but cause a smile.
Pavel Priluchny and Olga Pogodina are a real highlight of this film, you can not argue with this. Honestly, I did not expect that this couple would be so interesting, energetic and lively. At first, of course, their characters simply could not stand each other, but over time Timur and Alexandra begin to change their attitude to the situation, and the plot appears for a very charming romantic line, so the film definitely leaves after watching pleasant and warm emotions. What is the scene in the subway, when Timur got the opportunity to show his strengths, which was very difficult in a huge crowd. Alexandra is not at all used to public transport, preferring a personal business class car, and this is a real challenge for her, which is not so easy for her to cope with, although we are already accustomed to shaking every day for an hour if not in the same subway, so in the minibus. In general, it was fun to see how the characters get out of this situation and what conclusions they draw. And what I'm really excited about here is that it doesn't all go in a straight line, and there's an unexpected moment that just takes this story upside down. And then the film becomes not just funny and soulful, but also intriguing. This is especially true of the heroine Pogodina, whose story is much deeper than one might think. The finale here turned out to be touching and emotional, as I wanted.
I also want to mention here Anton performed by Alexei Chadov. His hero is a calculating, confident professional who knows his business perfectly and will not let go of his hands what he considers his own. It’s not easy to deal with him because he’s much more cunning than you might think, but that’s what the hero got me. In general, I do not even remember that Chadov’s filmography had such audacious roles, and that is why he is especially interesting here. His hero needs an eye and an eye and closer to the end he will definitely give us a few surprises.
Also, Stanislav Duzhnikov and Dmitry Khrustalev deserve special attention here, who played the faithful assistants of the hero Priluchny. They are always on his back and their boss will never leave in trouble. Although sometimes you really want to run away at least on vacation for a week, since Timur Baburin has a lot of crazy ideas, and the guys have health and patience that is not rubbery. In general, these guys are fully responsible for humor here and in each episode they come to a place. Especially pleased, as always, amusing and soulful Duzhnikov.
As a result, I will say that “The Oligarch Driver” is a comedy that easily lifts the mood. That’s the kind of exciting, positive and beautiful movie I wanted to see on the big screen. This means that you should definitely pay attention to it if you want to have a good time.