Max, a dwarf in a bad suit Expected to see a real monkey, and showed a dwarf in a scary suit. Maybe someone likes that, but not me. Played very unconvincingly, it is unlikely that the actor watched films about wildlife before filming, which certainly kills the animal romance expected from the film. Even the monkey made sounds that were more common to sick people than to chimpanzees, and I'm not talking about movements -- just moving through space and climbing trees, interacting with objects -- that's a pathetic parody. Everything could save the turn in the end, in which the monkey would remove the mask and it turned out that it was a disguised dwarf (as it was in fact), then a lot of the film would fall into place, but no.
The film began with the idea of a sexual relationship between a person and an animal, that is, with the theme, in fact, psychiatric disorders. But somewhere in the second third, it turns into something like “Harry and Henderson” or “Free Willie,” when the cuckold husband, for some reason, is imbued with love for a suddenly taken over monkey. By the way, the husband, unlike the other gathering, plays his idiotic role more less convincingly, and the character becomes flat only closer to the end. The author of the film never gave us an answer to the question of whether Max had sex and did not remember the name of this strange woman. It seems that it was, but then the script was adjusted by moralists and he radically changed his meaning, because of which he lost it.
On the other hand, it can be said that I do not understand anything about your (their) surrealism, that it is, after all, just illogical dreams, inspired by the film. Yeah, maybe. But, nevertheless, I think that this is the case when the delusions posed as a sur - just nonsense. Watched the film, just waiting for someone this chimpanzee to come along, but in vain: after the scene with a prostitute (along with the scene with a call from the hospital, the best in the film), the action slides into a family tale about a big shaggy friend. Pain. As always, I write a negative review only when the description of the film gave too much hope.