The Stupidest Conflict in Soviet Animation The second part of the franchise "38 parrots" (for convenience we will call it in tune with the first part) was released in 1977. All the characters you know from the first movie come back and don’t get better. The problems that have emerged before are even progressing.
It is funny that even the plot scheme has remained the same: again at the beginning a slight discussion of the obvious question with a clever look, and then a long solution to the main problem, which is that the characters are simply bored. They are bored, and the cartoon does not condemn it. Yes, this is 1977, the Soviet period. Many people probably praise this cartoon because they often watched it as a child on TV, but if you forget about nostalgia, then what can be praised here? Animation? I think so. The movements of the characters among the trees, as well as the transitions from one angle to another turned out to be as successful as puppet animation can be at all. The real "thank you" is to say for the elephant, who was cured of strabismus and now he looks at the world with normal eyes. However, having cured strabismus, the screenwriters shrugged off his mental development. It was just as stupid as it was.
It is the same with other characters, the exception of which is now not even the parrot. In fact, the conflict in “How to treat a boa constrictor?” is so ridiculous that it is difficult to find someone to blame. Everyone does stupidity, and when the characters also think about this stupidity (and they always do it for a long time), the cartoon begins to tire. It's hard to watch as the heroes make their elephant flies. Although if they heard this phrase themselves, for them it would be the real wisdom of Confucius.
An overly lauded cartoon that is actually very weak.
4 out of 10