Black times for animation, especially puppet The sequel to The Hedgehog Must Be Prickly reflects social fears in the early 1990s. All the characters, both old and new, talk about the black day that is about to come. If this cartoon was released before 2012, it would also be considered relevant.
But if there are no questions about the allusion to reality, then there is something completely wrong with the plot in the sequel. The world of the forest has expanded, we are shown a bunch of new animals that are gathering in fear, and in all this turmoil it is even somehow unclear who is the main character. He's not really here. There is already a familiar curly hedgehog, but the timing is smoothly distributed among all the characters: hedgehogs, white crow, squirrel, hare and bear. Didn't I tell you there's a puppet cartoon? Well, I'll tell you now. And the dolls here are ugly. This is especially true of a bear: a mutant from Chernobyl, not an ordinary forest dweller. For some reason, since the late 1980s, bears in puppet cartoons have become something incomprehensible. If you remember the “Lovely Crow”, then the bear is not himself there.
I honestly don’t understand what the idea of this cartoon is and why suddenly everyone believes the curly hedgehog that the black day has really come. The way to escape from problems is also strange. The only thing I learned was the morality that you can't panic in any situation, because panic causes more harm than the misfortunes themselves. That's right, I agree with that.
Still, it is strange that the secondary characters cause more interest here than the hedgehog family. The hare, for example, is voiced by Boris Novikov, whom you all know as the voice of Sharik from the Soviet trilogy of Prostokvashino. A good example is when a movie suffers from a bad script. Although visually it is bad.
3 out of 10