More often and its limits. I remember my best days in the woods: Half-naked girls with beautiful eyes but dirty hair, hid in the woods more often and chanted mantras, and we (two best friends), looking for them, squeaking and screeching. When we found them, we had to recite the mantra ourselves, and they hid deeper and deeper in the forest. In general, we found them, and they were hiding again, finding ... hiding ... but suddenly something changed this turn: when once again we were going to go (bikes, not cars ... so as not to pollute the atmosphere) in the woods, we decided to watch a movie. It was called Buddymoon, just like we love it. We looked and were upset, but not quite. We were happy too, but not to the end. Why? Yes, because the film is controversial and made us wonder whether we spend time in the woods.
And so try to understand the shown in the film:
I really like forests and rain - there are none here, or rather there are, but not. I mean, he's not what he's supposed to be. They're too pompous here (trees, leaves, creek..), like the roosters at Grandma's in the shed..I didn't even believe at first that you could shoot this way..but okay..it's not the worst thing.
At some point, they eat mushrooms and have hallucinatory visions. That doesn't happen! You don't eat mushrooms! Mushrooms need to be fried or cooked first. It is clear that there will be hallucinations, raw, who eats them? AU!
Ending: The ending is not cool, the ending saved the whole film. Only because of the ending is worth watching, it is excellent here, with morals.
General conclusion: If you’re a naturalist and a traveler, there’s no nature spirit in the film and no believable animal screams. If you're here to watch mushrooms eat, it's just a hoax.
But if you want a quality and unpredictable ending, this movie is for you.
Assessment of the film critic (that is me):
7 out of 10