Threesome. Numerical as a definition in the title of the film says that the situation is not ordinary, except that it should carry the function of difference in the catalogues and menus of cinemas, implying a certain, exotic harmony, in comparison, for example, with the “love triangle”, in which, of course, there are “sharp angles”, both geometrically and metaphorically.
A rather simple social community of three people implies, or, it turns out, complex connections that make you recall Lobachevsky’s imaginary geometry.
The film would clearly have had a conceptual nature of “dystopian” content, if it were no longer a drowning, or, milder, not plunged into the muddle of the Brownian movement, not regulated by society relations of the sexes.
Where are those sexes? – died biological determinism, with uteruses, sperm, zygotes – Darwin had only a place in the RAS, a member of the correspondent – as the basis of morality – only gene manipulation, fantastic tools dispassionate Faust.
The film, as a socio-cultural phenomenon, with elements of art, should, if you will, reflect the current reality, no matter how grotesque, in ambivalent forms, attracting angels, the devil, etc. from the old props to adapt conservative citizens to new forms of being, not forgetting pink glasses, and aquamorine pool filters.