Third Punisher Technological progress in the field of special effects and computer graphics has stepped far forward after the first film adaptation of "The Executioner" & #39; with Dolph Lungren, but this is not the key to the success of a good film. I would like to see an interesting plot, the motivation of the characters, not another ' Shoot them' with Clive Owen. We’ve already seen the grinding action without meaning, we need creative ideas and an approach to the production!
You can watch this film, you can also enjoy watching it, but only from the tricks and effects, and not from the film itself. The creators relish the scenes of violence with their soul, which cannot but please the eyes of fans of this genre. Of the minuses, I personally did not like the game of Ray Stevenson, since I did not see this game, it turned out to be a monument with one facial expression, and not a living person. Well, plus did not like the obviously rubber mask of the main villain.
The conclusion for me is this - ' The Punisher' with Thomas Jane was good enough in comparison with the new remake, and to make a new film with ' Mad Avenger' without new ideas, but with new technologies, it didn't make much sense. As they say 'a movie for an amateur'.
7 out of 10
Original