Not bad, but no more. I liked the unusual visual style: it is 3D, but stylized for the drawing graphics. Sometimes it's like a plasticine cartoon. In terms of the “mood” of the drawing (here’s this classic cuteness) and character designs, it clearly refers to the original 1987 animated series and Archie comics, and contrasts with the
more
Not bad, but no more. I liked the unusual visual style: it is 3D, but stylized for the drawing graphics. Sometimes it's like a plasticine cartoon. In terms of the “mood” of the drawing (here’s this classic cuteness) and character designs, it clearly refers to the original 1987 animated series and Archie comics, and contrasts with the more “hard” versions of turtles. And it would seem: if designed for that generation of fans, then it would be worth the viewer to expect plot something close. But no. This is a pretty strong rethink: there are not only turtles, but also April of the age of high school graduates, Bebop and Rocksteady are not to say that negative characters, and Shredder appears only at the very end as a setback for the sequel. The psychology, behavior, and even voice of turtles are quite childish when compared to the 1987 version. In that version, the turtles, although they were called “teenage...”, were more than 20 years old in behavior and reason. It’s really a teenager here :. And the relevant issues are considered: recognition from peers and girls, bullying, teenage rebellion against the “father”, etc. By the way, Splinter is literally called "father" here. Of course, only a lazy commentator at the stage of the trailers did not pass the agenda (black girl April with the Irish name O'Neill, fat and without relying April boobs), but it, frankly, I was not particularly bothered here, but the general childishness of turtles - strained.
|