It's an interesting idea, and it's all satiated.
Unfortunately, since there is a joint in the plot, there will be spoilers in the description. Careful.
Like the first series.
We have a lot of cosphene evidence of your guilt.
Suspect, no comment.
- but you'll be tried by a jury.
Well, your proof is shit, explains why it's shit. Here's the evidence that I'm innocent, here's the evidence that another person is guilty.
- No, we have new, very good indirect evidence of your guilt, so we won't check your evidence, you're guilty.
Actors are also controversial. In the first series everything is fine.
In the second, the suspect testifies against his version. I don't know why. I just had to keep quiet.
In the third, it becomes clear that we need to negotiate with the investigation. There is no reason to be silent (except for the beginning of the series). But the defendant is silent. I promised to talk at the beginning. Where's the logic? All right, defendant, maybe in shock, but is the lawyer chewing on snot?
