Often the director, writer and producer is a wake-up call. There are masterpiece exceptions, but not in the case of Zardosis. During the viewing, the same thoughts come to mind: did the creator sit on some hard drugs, tried to tie up, could not and switched to even heavier ones? Or did he watch "Naked Breakfast" and decide to try it?
more
Often the director, writer and producer is a wake-up call. There are masterpiece exceptions, but not in the case of Zardosis. During the viewing, the same thoughts come to mind: did the creator sit on some hard drugs, tried to tie up, could not and switched to even heavier ones? Or did he watch "Naked Breakfast" and decide to try it? The film itself can only be experienced, endured and overcome. The general idea is clear, and it is revealed gradually. But if reading the idea gives more aesthetic pleasure than contemplating the “canvas”, then something is completely wrong with the film. It would be enough to cut out of the cinema all the curvature, twitching and howling, and a good third of the tape would not be. By the way, it would only benefit her. Not to mention the verbal halimatha about the genetic structure of fractal refractions of mutant something out there and out there. And as a result, it is impossible to imbue the idea and pathos of the kin due to the inability to take seriously and emotionally what was shown.
|