Of the advantages - only high-class drawing, examples of which in the whole world of animation a few units. That's an indisputable plus.
If you go further in content, then everything is bad:
- In the beginning, there is a completely incomprehensible mistake. A blind woman (possibly Themis) appears twice in a row with the same animation
more
Of the advantages - only high-class drawing, examples of which in the whole world of animation a few units. That's an indisputable plus.
If you go further in content, then everything is bad:
- In the beginning, there is a completely incomprehensible mistake. A blind woman (possibly Themis) appears twice in a row with the same animation and utters the same phrase. What the hell? You have to make a mistake to make it so good. Did the authors even watch their cartoon?
The Greek gods say that there is only one seer among them. Myths are filled with a variety of prophecies.
- Eros is shown as the unambiguous son of Aphrodite - in myths there are a huge number of discrepancies on this score, among his mothers who are not called, there is also a version that he was not born from anyone, so in the cartoon it was worthwhile to bypass this question.
- Erota is being torn to pieces by lions, and what will they do to him? He's a god, he's immortal. There are ways to kill gods, but lions are not.
There was no love before his birth. What was Aphrodite the goddess then?
- Erot is sounded terrible, his voice sawing nerves, and baby crying does not sound as such. What prevented you from recording the baby’s real cry?
Thus, the cartoon deserves attention for its almost unique picture and the first nudity in the Soviet space, but its content when considered leaves the impression of complete incompleteness.
|
