Very unusual film. Unlike the expected horrors of an orphanage, we are not shown the expected shabby corners and total devastation (this is true in the film, and so it is stated in plain text).
The film was shot qualitatively, to confess, the moment when the peculiarity of the orphanage in question is shocking. Indeed, the way things look on paper and the way these kids communicate doesn't beat at all.
One could say that this documentary raises an important question: we really don’t have normal mechanisms for diagnosis and further social integration and rehabilitation, so the problems of these children are largely not in their condition, but in their documents. The only problem is that this is not a documentary. It's a reportage, a social ad, a statement -- anything but documentary.
The author initially divides the sides into “good” and “bad”, takes one of the sides and continues shooting in an extremely emotional manner. Various coverage of the problem will not be here. Snippets of comments of orphanage employees reveal part of the problem, but the format itself with slicing answers, although it looks spectacular, does not cause proper trust. There's a lot to take out of context.
Thank you for highlighting the film. However, the manner in which it is filmed, and the lack of even hints of attempts to create some kind of dialogue to solve the above problem and the constant emotional manipulation of the viewer is a very sad feature of low-quality documentary, which should not be encouraged.