Introduction to Homo Spiritualis Philosophy I watched this movie, considering it a continuation of Earthlings. In a sense, it is, but this film deals with issues of a higher, one can say philosophical level.
The formula of "Earthlings" - man, animal, tree - migrated here, but now these concepts are united not by the concept of "earthlings", but by a slightly more complex formula - "not the same, but one".
The film discusses issues of natural rights (mainly humans, but also animals), war, violence, love, separation and differences on different grounds.
There are fewer animal abuse scenes in this film than in Earthlings, but they leave a very painful impression. Of the topics listed above, the theme of war runs through the film, apparently as the apotheosis of humanity’s ability to divide, violence and destruction.
The last two parts of the film are more philosophical, they contain reflections on what love is, what is the purpose of life, what will humanity come to and related questions are asked. To some of them, the author offers his answer, and invites the viewer to reflect.
After viewing, there was a strong impression that the visual series slightly confuses the perception of the ideas that the director is trying to convey and reduces their critical perception. For me, there are many “white spots” left here and, apparently, I will need to listen to the film again, without being distracted by the picture.
8 out of 10