New milestone in post-credits scenes (without spoilers)
There won’t be any new Marvel movies until next spring. How does the comic book universe end the season? How did the second spider turn out? Are there scenes after the credits, are they worth waiting for? Impressions without spoilers are below your attention.
Very successfully Marvel rebooted the story of Spider-Man, leaving all the canonical for the film adaptation of the plots. Everything is modern, in a new way and a new story. That's fascinating.
The second series of the restarted friendly neighbor turned out bright and interesting. The film has become much more funny and kind humor (without vulgarity). A lot of references to other superheroes. In the beginning, there is even a small explanation for everything that happened after Thanos clicked again, when after 5 years, half of humanity returned, while the others already 5 years lived their lives and aged.
The plot came out quite dynamic, although painfully predictable. Mysterio was well implemented, explaining how it turned out. Even in the comics, Mysterio was an illusionist - not a magician, but a hero who knows how to create illusions of the surrounding world. And in Spider-Man 2, this idea was implemented very well and 100%. The graphics are amazing when Peter Parker falls into the illusion. It looks incredible, but for the sake of this moment you can already go to IMAX with a calm soul without sparing money.
But the most high this time - the scenes after the credits. They don’t hint at what’s going to happen in the Marvel Universe. They tell you where everything is going to go next. And the intrigues of these stories are actually impressive. It’s been a long time waiting...
Only the very sloppy moments of laustories were laughed at, and the things that plagued Hollywood were the themes of feminism, tolerance and so on. It's a real bacillus. Imagine! One of the scenes where the characters: three male and two girls, hiding from the enemy breaking through the door. The boys stand confused, and the girls somewhere have found a mace and a spade - and stand armed, like we will protect everyone. Just a gauntlet and facepalm... Shameful. I'm not talking about the Black Mermaid in the near future. Thank you for not being gay transgender. Although...
Over. Going to a comic book movie, you get, in fact, everything you expect from it. No surprises associated with dashing plot twists or incredible twists. No, everything is quite linear, but cheerful and dynamic, not boring at all. Plus a lot of action, incredibly spectacular special effects and the cherry on the cake all this case is seasoned with cute funny humor. Lovers of the Marvel Universe definitely need to go and watch, preferably in IMAX. If the comic genre is not your topic, then do not waste time and money, nothing incredible film will certainly not surprise you.
There's nothing to say. It’s true, well, this movie doesn’t give even the slightest inspiration to write anything, and writing without inspiration is pretty nasty, as for me. But okay, so be it, you can, of course, something else to paint and package, but it is so boring and meaningless in this case. Seen, seen the plot, action ten thousand times, characters, concepts of jokes, places and the development of conflict with the denouement – I’m not really going to sit like a fool and write “Mmm, this is better than in the first part.” Why? I'd rather just share my unbiased impressions lightly.
Jake Gyllenhaal - I trust this guy. He’s the kind of actor who can drive me to the cinema for any movie he does. I understand that with regard to this project, its charisma and acting instinct, uniqueness and craving for the unusual necessarily say yes, but the producers say no. Well, I don't want you to get away from the producers, I don't care about your movie when it looks like this. It can be as funny, dynamic, beautiful as you like, but not a ounce of it will remain in me as long as it is chained in such strong and unbreakable chains. I don’t know what it takes to make Jake play badly, but I understand how easy it is to turn his outstanding performance into a meaningless and absurd circus. But stop, it’s even worse – it may have happened before. When I saw how indifferent, lazy and just bad McAvoy, Fassbender and Jenny were playing in Dark Phoenix, something ran out of me, washed away. And it will never come back, and it's all their fault. But it was a truly disgusting movie, the creators of Spider, of course, would not have sunk to such a bottom.
No, on the contrary, frankly, it is not a bad movie, it can even be called quite successful, especially in the context of their children's cinema universe, but at the same time I get disgusted at the thought of it. When I think you can just slit your throat and not put it under a stupid train. Especially if it's the kind of psycho they're trying to portray. I would never believe that, for example, the Joker would engage in such nonsense. You know, crazy, crazy, call it what you want, if he decides to kill someone and he can easily do it, he will never make a clown and roll a stupid and aimless bravado for half an hour, he will just kill a person, and perhaps in the most cruel way. And if the speech pushes, it is not for nothing, but for a certain psychological pressure and morally destructive impact. You see, a real psychopath doesn't have an age rating, and you can't apply all these restraining criteria that supposedly scare off a potential viewer. Kill one of Peter Parker's friends! Strangle Aunt May if you have to. Make something worthwhile if you really want to reflect Spider-Man’s dilemma, how he is torn between superhero activity, responsibility and normal life with his loved ones.
Otherwise, you know, it’s just impossible to believe. I don't believe in this Mysterio, it's not a verdict, just a fact. I like him as a character, but I don’t believe in him for a second. That's how I see it? It doesn't have to be like that. I'm sitting in a movie room, and it seems like everything is crawling as it should, according to a pattern previously drawn up by others, but the soul, all the insides are praying for something more. And no matter how hard I try, no matter how much I look at each damn shot, I can not see anything beyond what is already obvious from the beginning. When, you know, there's a lot of movies where re-watching gives you a greater understanding of what's going on there, opens up new facets and so on, and it's different when you look at this for the second time or (I'm afraid to even imagine) the third time, you're only going to make your impressions worse and it's quite possible you're going to look at a lot of shortcomings, which should give you certain thoughts if you have a brain and even a little idea of art.
The smartest people always say, “If you don’t like why you’re looking, go to something else.” But that's what movie theaters do. “Spider-Man” I can see literally anywhere, but for some non-standard and not very publicized film I have to drag to the other side of the world. Is that good for you? That is, if your tastes coincide with the opinion of the masses, then you will be given comfort, opportunities, and freedom of choice, and if not, then you are a loser and must suffer, because you do not make a lot of money. And then they'll laugh, "How didn't you watch Avengers Finale?" But I didn’t look like that (I looked of course, everything is conditional, all coincidences with reality are accidental). And in general, what is real?, I am not interested, and I do not understand what so incredible I can see there! What if they showed porn on the big screen, and everybody ran to watch it because it was fashionable and fun and, of course, very nice, and then they convinced me that it was absolutely normal – a conventional thing. Then I would feel like I'm not like everyone else. When I want to talk to someone about an interesting movie, nobody knows what I'm talking about. But once you open your mouth, talking about Marvel, with me immediately ready to talk long and willingly.
[Script is a dream] I was a kid and I had a dream to make a deep, grand movie that the whole world would see. So that I could open my soul to them and share my thoughts so that they could all understand and share my feelings with me (I had them then), I was still drawing my fantasies like comics, yes. And so it all happened, I had the opportunity to make my movie. But they destroyed my dream, those greedy, soulless faces screwed it up, and I opened up to them, naively believing that they were really interested in what I wanted to convey to people. But in fact, they didn't need it, they ate everything and spit out only a nasty substance. I could no longer control my creation, it belonged to them, and they made it into a stupid show for those who just want to cheer and relax, and I became a normal weak-willed participant, a face on the cover.
And so, everything is great, a good movie, watch and rejoice, no one complains.
"Spider-Man: Far From Home" without SMS, registration and spoilers
Well, let's go, let's see... And, as you would expect, it was great! And that’s probably the end of it, because movies from #Marvel Studios usually come out, plus/minus, at a fairly high level of quality (not counting “Captain Marvel”) and constantly singing them praises has become a matter of course. The MARVEL plaque itself at the beginning of their films, for some time, is a guarantee of quality that with a probability of 90% of the movie you, at least, will distract you for a couple of hours giving pleasure from watching the next, albeit conveyor, movie attraction (the rule does not apply to watching Captain Marvel and fans of the series Deaf).
What about Spider? It's pretty good out there! To my taste, Far From Home turned out to be a head taller than Homecoming. Spider-Man/Parker himself has changed markedly since his first twists in Civil War. You can see the evolution of the character: he became more serious, responsible, his youthful maximalism and rebellious spirit disappeared. In general, it seems that the film focuses on the disclosure of Parker’s personality, and not Spider’s culbits, which are also enough here. A huge thank you to the ghost of Stan Lee for the fact that in the film there is no rabid and absolutely cardboard love interest of Parker (Liz, the daughter of the Vulture from Homecoming), who all first solo fanned fish eyes and blew a sponge while Spider, over whom the procession of spermotoxicosis took, galloped around her like an idiot. Here, by the way, there is also a love line and it, oh, miraculously, is written adequately and organically fits into the pace of what is happening, it is MUCH more interesting to watch than the development of relations in all previous versions of Spider films, here the actors tried and the screenwriters, apparently, released from prison and they finally learned how teenagers behave in the real world. Humor, drama, action and special effects at height, there is nothing to add. Action, by the way, there at least eat a spoon, but they are not clogged with all two hours of timing and it is just VERY action, well, in the framework of a solo film about Spider, of course, the scale of “Infinity War” should not be expected. Separately, I want to mention Mysterio, he was just gorgeous! That's it. I won’t say anything more, since any discussion of this character will spoiler the plot twist associated with him.
Anyway, it's a great movie! Of course, not perfect (for example, it pronounces the name of Captain Marvel), there is always something to find fault with, but despite this, I really liked the new Spider! A non-stressing summer blockbuster with a juicy picture, good humor, talented actors, a good plot, cool action, a great villain, a lot of fan service and J. John Jameson in the post-credits scene. It is definitely worth going!
It would seem that this is the eighth appearance of Spider-Man on the big screen, this is his fifth appearance in the framework of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. And I really didn't expect that this film, after so many stories of varying degrees of quality, would be able to do something unique, hitherto unseen in the lore of Spider-Man. And he did. Yes, he was able not only to charm me, but also to surprise me very much.
First of all, I want to say that the appearance of Mysterio in the Spider-Man film I have been waiting for since the Sam Raimi trilogy. Sam teased fans every film, featuring a cameo by Bruce Campbell, which was later to become Mysterio, but as you know, did not work out. And what was my joy when I learned that the sequel to the rather good Spider-Man: Homecoming will appear the very unfortunate Mysterio. And even played not by anyone, but by Jake Gyllenhaal himself. And my expectations were more than paid off: Mysterio turned out to be a really great villain, although his motives were vague. However, this is one of the most interesting Spider-Man villains to appear on the big screen.
Naturally, this is not the only advantage of the carina. In fact, all the good from the first film moved into the second, and even this good became more. More jokes, more action, more interesting story. By the way, this film made a huge contribution to the cinematic universe. It’s so huge that I’ve even reconsidered my attitude toward Captain Marvel (Yes, yes, don’t be surprised!). There's also a lot of references to Spider-Man movies, and in the first post-credits scene, I just screamed like a little kid. That was amazing. I think all fans of the Sam Raimi trilogy will stand in solidarity with mine.
Tom Holland may not be the best spider, but here he seemed more convincing and open than in the first part. In tone, the new emergency is more fun than the first film. I'd even say it's more like the recent Shazam!, but I thought Spider-Man: Far from home delivers more than Shazam.
And what is important, this film very skillfully plays with the main morality: 'With great power comes great responsibility'.
As a result, this is the most fun and driven Spider-Man movie, and the best Spider-Man movie since Sam Raimi’s trilogy. In short, this is the rare case where the sequel is better than the original.
9 out of 10
Spider-Man. It’s no secret that many fans of this superhero love the Toby trilogy. Someone in the heart likes the dilogy with Andrew. Others, the animated series of the 90s, and in general, Homecoming with Tom, as well as the cartoon PE: through the universes, also found their audience - it is natural. And so the latest Marvel movie in Phase Three, the sequel to the Friendly Neighbor story, was eagerly awaited.
No sooner had the audience’s impressions to grow a web after the epochal events of the fourth “Avengers”, as Marvel Studios release a new chapter in the history of their common Cinematic Universe on world screens. Events ' Far From Home' take place after 'Final' the whole world (including Peter) is sad for Iron Man and the rest of the Avengers who died. Time doesn't stand still. Peter needs to improve his life further, he goes with the class on vacation to Europe, have a good time and at the same time confess to MJ his feelings, but, alas and ah, everything at some point goes not in favor of the student, and in Europe, he will not rest.
The tone of the sequel noticeably changes its atmosphere towards a romantic teenage comedy, along the way moving to an action film, as soon as Mysterio appears in the frame. The main thing is that the degree of seriousness of what is happening has changed. Peter Parker has grown up. He feels a great responsibility for his actions and accepts mistakes as a duty to make things right. This happened in the first part, when Tony Stark took away his innovative suit, saying: “If you are nobody without a suit, you are not worthy of it.” However, Peter is still naive, but only because he is kind and responsive. And also in love: here is the brain is not always in place.
The romantic line, on the one hand, seems interesting, although both have inner teenage awkwardness (of course, they are 16). On the other hand, she does not become the center of the narrative, although MJ's attentiveness and her incredulity move the action - the girl reveals the identity of Spider-Man (according to the trailer) and lifts the veil of mystery Mysterio.
Speaking of evil. Jake Gyllenhaal perfectly performed the role of the villain, he is a walking charisma. The main antagonist of the picture, which all fans have been waiting for on the screens for decades, is 100% executed. His motivation is clear and clear, he doesn't look like an empty, stupid villain. Quentin Beck is the greatest magician and illusionist. Perfectly transferred from the comics version not only enriched “Far from home” one way, but also diversified the action film, which in the stunning second half of the picture acquires mind-blowing ingenuity thanks to the villain. Some scenes have horror shades (the effect of delusion of the brain to Peter, creating a psychological trip) and a couple of moments will make you remember the visual of “Doctor Strange”.
Tom Holland this time lives up to his expectations as Spider and makes it clear that he is ripe to be at the forefront of the new phase of the MCU. Yes, there are fans of this superhero who do not quite like this variation of Spider (there are many things to choose from here). Still, I want to say that we got the right Spider-Man franchise. With his youthful charm and charm, you can see how sincerely he shows himself in the image of Spider, which is very gratifying for him. His appearance in the Cinematic Universe increasingly reveals to us the multifaceted lore of a friendly neighbor.
Characters of the second plan look very, very good, complement the picture. Fury is strict, gives Peter no indulgences, loads more tasks. Happy as a mutual friend of Peter, well understands him, looks normal, plus still acts as a suitor for Aunt May. Aunt May is a hot woman, and sometimes it seems that she was created to flirt with her age friends of the spider. First it was Tony Stark, now it's Happy. But she does not forget about Peter, throwing him the right thing on the trip. Zendaya performed well here as a smart girl. And even such a romantic line of MJ and Peter can be called worthy. But the line of relationship between best friend Ned and Betty, goes to the level above the relationship MJ / Peter. The guys tried, and they look very convincing, well done.
"Far from home" works well even as a holiday advertising in Europe. The film touches on the main attractions: Charles Bridge in Prague, the Alpine Mountains in Austria, Tower Bridge in London, Berlin, as well as a tulip field in Holland. For the MCU, Far From Home is a radical step forward towards real field photography in recognizable European cities. As a result, the sequel was successful, in places slightly surpasses the first film about the Friendly Neighbor. Visual good, villain beautiful, Spider reveals better. The film has enough humor, beautiful plans of European attractions, many interesting actors and a pleasant romantic atmosphere. The film is worth your attention.
To disassemble the latest film of the Infinity Saga is not the most grateful thing for me. At least because it contributes little to the cinematic universe. This is rather a kind of epilogue for the 3rd and the prologue for the 4th phase of the MCU. Therefore, I will proceed from a subject that mocks under objectivity.
Peter Parker (Tom Holland) after the events ' Endgame' tries to rebuild his old life, starting small - going with friends on a trip to Europe. But traditionally, plans are disrupted by another evil in the form of elementals that threaten to destroy all living things. Agents of the Shield, led by Fury ("Samuel L. Jackson") and a new ally, Mysterio ("Jake Gyllenhaal"), come to the rescue.
The very events of the film are very difficult to perceive as something super-serious, something that could be perceived with the effect of VAH or any other mood. Importantly, the film is perfect in conjunction with the idea ' The end is just a new beginning'. Another character around whom you could build a sequel to the saga would be simply wrong. This is a down-to-earth, unstressed film that tries to continue thinking while dispelling too high-profile events. This can be done in a few ways.
Mysterio performed by Jake Gyllenhaal causes children's delight. This is an insidious, intelligent and very charming character, whose appearance causes pleasant impressions. This is the type of character that commands respect, because it does a minimum of action and has really devastating consequences. His stunning illusions (moments in which you really press yourself into the chair with tension), standing on the head above similar scenes ' Doctor Strange', caused a storm of emotions. I would like it to appear in the cinematic universe, although in view of the ending it is more than problematic.
But at some point, you catch yourself thinking that the movie isn't about that anymore. It's about school years and youth in general. The time when you realize that problems drag you to the bottom, and you want to have a good time with friends, and like your beloved girl. Comedy duo Holland and Jacob Batalon in some moments looks hilarious, and for the subject of courtship is now responsible Zendaya. And their relationship looks very sweet, because they are so insecure, awkward and modest for a relationship that it involuntarily makes it to a wide smile.
In other respects, the film is not very impressive. There are a couple of plot twists that you can easily guess about (but about the scenes after the credits you can not say so). Sometimes, while watching, you catch yourself thinking that you came to the cinema and do not get an abundance of something incredible and cool, but then you realize that this is good entertainment, a cool attraction and the people who made this and other Marvel films invested a lot of energy, time and money to see on the big screen what we could only dream of as a child. I have a lot of respect for Kevin Feige, who is one of the few producers who really wants to bring that kind of emotion. And no matter how many films later came out, and no matter how little semantic load they did not carry, these are films that immerse us in the atmosphere of fairy tales, talk to us in the same language and realize our loudest fantasies. Isn't that cool?
8 out of 10
PS. And yes, they weren’t kidding (a little spoiler), the creators actually brought J.K. Simmons back to play J.J. Jameson. Activate mode: 'Send me pictures of Spider-Man!!'
The finale of the Infinity Saga left us with a shattered world and the conclusion of the story of beloved heroes. We needed a picture that would show the balance of forces on the battlefield, according to which vector the cinematic universe will develop in the next few years. From a global perspective, Far From Home must answer these questions. After leaving the cinema, I could not give an unambiguous assessment of the film. Tormented between seven and nine. Next, we will analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the picture, share our impressions and find out what I put in the end.
The plot begins with the moment when all the Spider-Man heroes erased from the face of the Earth return and experience the feeling when you remained the same as before the Click, and your classmate grew up for five years, becoming handsome and attractive to the fair sex, although he used to be a pimple nerd. But not the point. All the main Avengers have sunk into oblivion, and the threats from this have not become less and Peter Parker after all the experiences decides to take time off to confess his feelings to MJ. But if you're a superhero, you have to give up something as small as a normal human life. More precisely, all the plans of the husband, not the boy, are crumbling under the yoke of Nick Fury and a new threat to Europe. In general, the narrative part of the film I liked, because in the broth called “MCU” I cook for quite a long time and know a little background, I managed to enjoy a simple plot in a high-quality wrapper. One disadvantage is predictability, some moves and turns of the main line can be predicted in advance, but in the cinema this impression does not spoil at all, you already realize after the fact what blunders and jambs. If you go to a movie like this to count the writers’ punctures in logic, then no movie will like it. I liked the fact that the central theme of the whole film was the legacy of Tony Stark and the story arc of Peter Parker is reduced to understanding why he was chosen by Stark as his successor. In general, the whole film turned out to be a kind of tributary to Iron Man, and not only because of the references, but because of the core underlying the conflict. In terms of script, everything suited me. I'll give you four out of five criteria.
No one doubted that it would be spectacular, since the least complaints were to visuals and special effects. The way the battles are staged in this film deserves praise, the elementals look impressive, especially in the second half of the film, as docks in terms of destruction they create the dynamism of the overall narrative, plus it is worth praising visionaries and designers of effects with scenery for recreating the illusory branches of reality, here the film can compete with Doctor Strange, as it looks all incredibly good in 3D. Also, the advantage is that all dynamic scenes are in the right proportions with dialogue and in conversational episodes is also not boring, since humor is also well worked out, since in isolation from the superheroic epic, this film is still a good youth comedy, in which there are situational jokes that laugh in voice, there are “smiling” things that are just funny, but you can smile. For dynamic storytelling and visionary delights, I will give the film a hard five out of five.
Activity I was very pleased. Tom Holland has shown that he can play character roles because Peter Parker is the younger version of Tony Stark, who, having made mistakes, also sought to correct them in time. Here the Spider is doubly responsible, not only because he has a strong dramaturgy on his side, but also because he shows the extent to which further innovations in the fourth phase of the Cinematic Universe are robust. Jake Gyllenhaal in the image of Quentin Beck also turned out to be a moderately pathetic master of illusions, and the best part of his story is built on this skill, played well, without question. Zendaya at one point steals men's hearts, is charming and attractive, as always. Marisa Tomei in the role of Aunt May also looks without question, on her relationship with John Favreau built a small part of the jokes. I'll give you five stars.
The soundtrack in the film is not bad, there are rocking themes asking for a playlist, there are just atmospheric sounds, but the composer was best at melodies that emphasize the heroic pathos of the scenes, plus the music from the final credits is lively, I wanted to move. I don’t have five stars in this category.
Verdictating. The film is definitely worth watching, because it is the transformation of the main character from a friendly neighbor into a full-fledged heir to the title “Iron Man”. Plus, it adds witty and sometimes hilarious humor, battles with villains and the most important scenes after the credits. Other drawbacks besides the easily predictable development of the plot, I did not reveal for myself. I'll give the film eight out of ten. That was my opinion of the film. Go to a movie and share yours. Good to you all!
I don’t even know how to start this review. This film is expected no less than expected 'Final' as it completes the third phase of the MCU. And damn it, the movie lives up to its expectations! This is a crazy picture, which sometimes makes you lie with laughter under the chair, and sometimes makes you think about the eternal, but about everything in order.
Emotionally, the film is divided into two parts. Since there are two screenwriters in the picture, you can easily see the boundaries of writing each of them. The first part of the film is an abundance of jokes and gags, like watching a good stand-up. It makes you smile and scream at the situations that are happening. The second part is more dramatic. It is almost devoid of humor and should be taken more seriously. In this part, all the characters experience strong emotions from hysteria to sadness. Dilute both parts with action, which is generally to the place and does not annoy.
Let's move on to character analysis.
Peter Parker. Nick Fury. Honestly, it seems to me that the character of Samuel L. Jackson is dull from picture to picture. With all his technology and a bunch of assistants, he could not recognize the villain, despite the fact that he literally stood in front of him and voiced his plans. Of course, this can be attributed to the fact that he disappeared for 5 years. However, the action takes place in the not too distant future after those events, and in a good way he should not have much to sag in mental abilities.
Mysterio. This is where the writers worked hard. The character came out just amazing. Partly for this we can say thank you to the actor who played it, but not without punctures. Firstly, almost all aspects of the classic Mysterio 39 were pumped: holographic technologies were pumped, the mind was pumped, abilities were also pumped. However, if you take a closer look at the motivation and actions of this character, you can see that his concept almost completely repeats the villain from Iron Man-3'. I don’t quite understand why this was done, but it spoils the impression of a very strong character in terms of charisma. The actions of the hero are mainly due to a lack of attention. They are certainly global, but their motivation is rather weak.
MJ. Yeah, I'm so slow that I only found out a couple of days ago that MJ turns out to be an acronym for Michelle Jones ... without comment. The character has not changed one iota since the first appearance. She's still wooden and in some places rude know-it-all. But the amazing thing is that he and Tom Holland look good together. I don't know how it works, but it's a fact. It all looks so absurd that it seems normal. The actress even tried to play drama in some places, but she was not very good at it.
And in the picture there are elements of horror. Somewhere in the 20th minute around the corner, suddenly a useless one will jump out. . LOVE LINE. At the sight of which you will cry with laughter, without jokes. In general, there are several such lines in the picture and they do not overload the picture at all, but even on the contrary emphasize everything that is happening.
8 out of 10
From the scenes after the credits blows nostalgia with a slight smell of mothballs. Kaef!
After the events ' Endgame' somehow it will be bitter to watch all the parts with the Iron man, knowing that he will die. But at the same time, I wanted to see what would happen to the universe. Which way will she go? I finally saw Mysterio, and I started watching for him. But the main thing I emphasized in this picture is: ' Never get conceited. It is a lie, and it is a lie.[39]
Most of the characters that disappeared and reappeared 5 years later were called "Flash 39" and it affected Parker. And although after 'End Game' could grow up to see the death of Stark actually it was possible, Peter (Tom Holland) still did not gain a mind of reason. What is worth the actor who played it, babbling, as in the film. While he's learning to be a receiver, he's not experienced, he's not confident. But along the way, he has three mentors: a tough father, a pleasant stepfather and a nice dad, in the person of Happy. They should tell you in which direction to go and perhaps save many lives and friends of the young hero.
John Favreau seems to be in demand everywhere. Then in 'The Mandalorian' and 'The Lion King' directing for Disney. And here three thousand times performs Happy Hogan And here, trying not to miss the time with Marisa Tomei.
Zendaya - in what ages her MJ tries to be real, especially in relation to Parker. And friends, trying to cope with love fever, walking in European. At the same time, the boy who grew up and grumbled to MJ throughout the entire timekeeping was terribly annoying. It would be better to pump his brain or be more responsible, but he will be rewarded for everything, from teachers. There were funny situations with them too. So wait.
Overall, I liked the film despite the outrage. I haven't seen the first part. Maybe for the best, because there was something to sit in a chair and watch the bizarre Mysterio / Quentin Beck - a master of illusions and now I understand what this aquarium is for! I now understand what Spidey would have been like if he had been replaced by Toby back in 2004. As well as other tricks that this part countered, it also took us back to Stark's past. Now it's easy for me to put him up with Keaton, he has a lot in common with him.
“Spider-Man: Far From Home completes the third phase of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and does so on a high note. The painting by John Watts turned out to be bright, bright and attractive. I want to thank the creators of special effects. They did their best. For example, the flooding in Venice, occurring in daylight, looked quite large-scale and realistic. Scenes of battles take place not somewhere on a dark desert background, but directly on the central streets of European cities.
Perhaps Peter Parker is one of the most understandable and pleasant superheroes. An ordinary teenager who is torn between wanting to live a normal life and finally admitting to his classmate's feelings and Tony Stark's responsibilities to save humanity. And the loss of his mentor, and the lack of knowledge of how to do the right thing, certainly puzzles him. However, all this is served without pathos, and, as in other works of Marvel, is flavored with good humor and a series of funny moments, organically fit into the script, which makes the film about the “friendly neighbor” easy and pleasant summer blockbuster.
Among other things, Spider can boast of a curious antagonist (there, by the way, there is absolutely no question why it is Spider-Man who opposes him, and not anyone else), who has a clear motivation, excellent charisma and quite reasonable and important thoughts, which we all would like to think about too.
8 out of 10
Sony made another attempt to prove that it is capable of staging with the key character of Marvel is not worse than Disney. Did it work? Partly.
The film as a whole copies the Disney template for creating a comic book film: an easy comedy pitch, a bright visual series and the connection of the characters with the real modern world.
Visual: Excellent. Everything about action and special effects is done perfectly. Mysterio's abilities are shown at the highest technical level. Some moments are amazing.
Actors' game: All actors work their heroes 100%. And young actors and actors with experience approached the case responsibly and there is no sense of playfulness or hacking throughout the film. It seemed a little bit that Samuel L. Jackson was already tired of the role of Fury and doing his job on the machine & #39; though not bad, but without the light, as a routine business. Perhaps it just seemed, perhaps it is not Jackson’s fault, and the problem of staging the film, but more about that later.
Plot: For most who are familiar with the world of Spider-Man and its main characters, the plot will be quite predictable, but this does not change the fact that it is interesting in itself, even if it is devoid of basic intrigue for you. Most of the original fan theories about the plot turned out to be completely untenable. This is the case, as it was in the run-up to the release of Avengers: Endgame & #39; when fans put forward the desired for the expected, and then received some disappointment from unfulfilled expectations. Fans sometimes forget that they are only part of the audience, and studio bosses, although they remember them, do not put them at the forefront of decision-making. The film should be interesting and understandable primarily for the mass audience. And too twisted plots requiring, among other things, knowledge of the history of all worlds, all their characters and the interweavings between them, can scare off the layman. In addition, although introducing modern and relevant elements into all comic books films with small deviations and assumptions, they are based on very specific plots from comics, since they are called the canon.
Production: This is where I found the braid on the rock. Sony was able to copy everything from Disney except the ability to make the film clear, structured and consistent. Story jumps, movie conventions, illogical explanations, inexplicable stupidity go parallel to the plot from beginning to end. A number of key characters lost all their experience and skills by the beginning of this story, otherwise it would be impossible to explain their frank myopia and misunderstanding of what is happening almost to the very end. In the course of the narrative, in certain places, there was periodically a feeling of lack of some part or scene, so dramatically changed or the situation or location or behavior of the character. According to the feelings of the film lacked an additional 20-30 minutes for smooth and consistent development of the plot and characters.
In addition, it seemed negative to me that part of the screen time was spent on focusing on minor characters, which eventually led to a lack of time for the main storyline and its normal development. The purpose of these deviations from the authors is clear, the film wanted to be interesting to everyone: adults who accompany their children to the cinema and viewers who want the presence of a romantic line, etc. Especially pretentious was the line MJ, where it was emphasized that she is not just a romantic interest for the main character, but a self-sufficient, independent personality with a character, and not just a Bond girl (Spider-Man).
Bottom line: a good summer blockbuster with an interesting story and a beautiful picture, but a limping production of the whole film, with conventions and assumptions, and pieces lost during editing. At the same time, she regularly emphasizes her connection with the last Avengers, but ignores the past experience of the heroes.
7 out of 10.
Greetings to all Cinemagolics and superhero lovers! I recently went to the preview of Spider-Man: Away from home and ready to share with you. The story begins almost immediately after the end of Avengers: Endgame. Steve Rogers left Cap’s post, Tony Stark mourns the world, the Avengers’ lineup has undergone huge changes, and all those sprayed by Thanos’ snap have come back to life. For 5 years, the remaining people continued to live with loss, grow, and move forward. And for those who returned from the dust, minutes passed. I mean, for example, some of Peter's classmates have grown up enormously. Residents will have to come to terms with new changes, and Spider goes with friends on a vacation in Europe, where new problems and adventures await him.
Without unnecessary words and introductions, I want to move on to the review “Far from home”, because I am afraid that the article will be so oversaturated and huge!
I'll start with ECT. As with all Marvel blockbusters, there are many such episodes. They are dynamic, colorful, exciting and as always impressive. In this case, the studio is already ace.
I will not focus on special effects, because we all know perfectly well that, as in the case of ECSHN, computer graphics here are at their height - realistic, beautiful, smooth and impressive.
The humor, in my opinion, is better than in the first part, but if I still remember a few jokes from Homecoming, then there are no memorable ones.
The tape has a perfect suitable light narrative, which tries to have time to tell and cover a lot. I was tormented by doubts that Far From Home would not cope with this task, but I was wrong.
The soundtrack was written by Michael Giacchino, who previously worked on Homecoming and the cartoons Up, Coco Mystery, Zootopia and many others. I want to say that the audio sequence, although it does not reach the level of Alan Silvestri’s compositions from “The Avengers”, but it still perfectly suits the cheerful and youthful mood of the film and in the right moments enhances the atmosphere.
Now, caste. Tom Holland is back as Peter. MJ played Zendai, Happy - John Favreau, Mysterio - Jake Gyllenhaal, Nick Fury - Samuel L. Jackson, Maria Hill - Kobe Smulders and Aunt May - Marisa Tomei. All without exception played above all praise, but I want to note separately the duet of Gyllenhaal and Holland. Their interaction and acting is the best thing in this film.
Spider-Man’s sequel has made it clear that Spider-Man will now replace Tony, the main character of Phase 4 of the MCU. After Homecoming, it was clear that Tony wanted to create a new avenger, leader and worthy successor. After five Spider appearances on Stark’s screens, it happened. Peter went through a long journey of transformation. In the sequel, he learned how ruthless and harsh the world is today and thanks to this, finally found the form to which fans and viewers are accustomed. We can happily say that Spider in this film is fully revealed and ready to take over the burden of the leader of the MCU, which previously on a permanent basis lay on the shoulders of Iron Man.
I want to discuss Mysterio separately. He turned out to be an incredibly interesting and has great potential for future Marvel films. I’m thrilled with how it was put on screen. I really want to see him again.
I'll summarize. The picture is a perfect completion of Phase 3 and a bridge to the 4th, as well as an excellent epilogue to Endgame. I liked the Spider sequel more than the first one. A gorgeous summer comedy superhero, which I advise to go undoubtedly to Marvel fans and just everyone.
P.S. - at the end there are 2 awesome scenes after the credits.
2019 will be remembered primarily by the total crisis of blockbuster ideas: 'Hellboy', 'Men in Black', 'Captain Marvel', 'A...okay. Even your friendly neighbor will look like Ryan Gosling. But fortunately, it also looks good against the background of the latest 'Mission Impossible'. Even if he's not meant to be Ryan Gosling.
If the first 'Spider-Man' stood out primarily as an anti-superhero: a simple boy, whom fate has prepared to fight the Gopniks, the sequel gives the following idea: ' a simple kid should become someone significant, because the time has already come' It’s either like an Instagram blogger who accidentally got caught up in a strange confluence of events, or a simple guy from a village who has to go to another city to support his family. Peter Parker, like this kid, sees a sign on every billboard: ' we need you. Payment of 25 thousand rubles & #39; It is a pity that they are only waiting for him in fast food. It is likely that they will leave.
Therefore, do not reproach ' Spider-Man' in cardboard psychology: this guy needs to suffer about girls and triples, and not because of the status assigned to him. Of course, he, like any teenager, will show off, dissipate, constantly harden, they say, I am in my 20s should already release rap albums or protect the world, and not huddle with you. But he's too stupid and young, right?
Peter Parker has to fight the villains 39 who are not his inner demons, but fakes. (And in a sense, the usual villains of MCU: ' I'll take over the whole world like that, for fun' but who cares?) Consequently, the problem of fakes in modern society suddenly comes to the fore. Of course, no one will talk about DeepFake, but rather about DSMF. Decipher it yourself, not the little ones. This approach is the conceptual merit of the sequel: it does not try to surprise us with interesting camera and directorial decisions as the first part. Moreover, it practically does not rely on any new solutions. On the contrary, it is completely through references to the adventures of other superheroes, because, as you know, the new generation always relies on the old.
The chosen entourage is not played at all. It seems to be a fake, or, if you like, a scenery. It's for the better: for the hundredth time to use jokes about stereotypes in Europe would be too terrible. But all the cakes and gegas invented by the writers are really good. Particularly striking are some of the excesses of the stick: in this film there is a six villain, whose mustache suspiciously resembles the mustache of one dictator of the twentieth century. Lest you confuse another dictator, he is responsible for the genocide of the Jewish people.
In short, despite the obvious arcs of the characters, the new ' Spider-Man' well-deserved like. Yes, the obviousness of the plot moves could be concealed: for example, if you provide the first act of the film with more scripted characters. But then the summer drive, which should be inherent in this film, is lost. This is not 'Drive'
The world was rocked by one of the largest and most anticipated blockbusters in history, the culmination of 22 films in the vast cinematic universe. Immediately after him, it was decided to release the second part of “Spider-Man” from Marvel and Disney studios, actually completing the story now 23 films.
Despite high-profile claims, Far From Home doesn't feel like the conclusion of Infinity Saga or a major film. Of course, there are many lines that refer to the deadened saga, but while maintaining the good tradition set by Homecoming, the new Spider-Man film remains a rather local story about Peter, a schoolboy with problems peculiar to him. Globality tries to bring Mysterio, but his story is somehow quite mundane and personal, as in the case of the Vulture.
Mysterio became what fans were especially waiting for in this film: finally, one of the most memorable villains will appear on the big screen, what a space for ideas! And in the end, it turned out ... Extremely controversial. In the beginning, he (with the help of Jake Gyllenhaal’s charisma) favors himself, even makes you think that Marvel will not dare to make him a villain, but then, when his past is revealed, he turns into a standard antagonist-one-day universe. But at the same time, the scene with its illusions became the most vivid, memorable and inventive for the entire film, as if coming off the pages of comics or games.
The jokes of the film, which is surprising for the MCU, became not very appropriate and not very funny, at least many of them. The toilet humor decreased, but awkward jokes (in the worst sense of the phrase) became much more.
Heroes remained in their seats and, with the exception of MJ and Peter himself, went by the wayside. But what came forward is the relationship between the above characters, which did not become awkward and unnecessary (unlike the attitude of Aunt May and Happy Hogan, leading to only one joke at the end), on the contrary, there is a chemistry between Tom Holland and Zendaya, given that their roles are played quite well, and it looks very organic as a story about schoolchildren.
The post-credits scenes in this film have again become critical to the film and the movie universe as a whole. They are funny and interesting, and one of them generally creates a huge scope for the further development of the Spider and the history of the MCU along with a lot of questions and hooks thrown into the future.
In eleven years, the Marvel Cinematic Universe has produced 23 films, and has it failed? Definitely not. Let Spider-Man: Far From Home is a standard film made to all the precepts, it introduces a few new ideas, develops old ones and is a very bright, memorable and not useless (hello to Captain Marvel) film. The spider is now the main avenger, and in the pile of [spoiler] that was shown in the post-credits scene, it could be an important starting point for the future of the movie universe. Not the best Spider-Man movie, it doesn’t beat Homecoming, but like the previous installment, it’s a great incarnation of a friendly neighbor on screen.
8 out of 10
After a very average first film on one occasion, there were doubts about whether the second would be a good one. In all previous incarnations of the spider web, there were beautiful action scenes that I could look up to holes. In ' Homecoming' there were no such scenes. Even the Russo brothers were much better able to show a friendly neighbor in their films. To my delight, the second part was much more interesting than the previous one. Here the merit of both the original concept of the superhero’s journey through Europe and the overall pace of the film, which does not sag and is devoid of boring moments. Of course, this was made possible by the heavy-handed editing that cut, or even removed, many of the scenes featured in the trailers, including one skirmish and one flight. But, at the first viewing, you do not have time to get bored and you can just enjoy the adventure story. The truth and it is not perfect, has holes (like a villainous plan) and moments pulled behind the ears. All this is too noticeable and in the end this illogicality darkens the impression of the film. It could have been better, more thoughtful.
Separately, I want to thank you for the fact that the creators did not highlight many action scenes in the videos. The battles in Berlin and London were pleasantly surprised. There's a cool plot twist that's cooler than the Vulture Family episode in the first movie. However, it can be accidentally missed, since it is in the first scene after the credits, which is a direct continuation of the closing film flight on the web. The second scene was a bit upsetting. Presenting another plot twist, which is not particularly necessary, the creators partially revealed the secret of how the hero can get out of the situation he got into in the first scene.
As a result, the film is a pleasant adventure, maximally devoid of boring and unnecessary moments. The villainous plot canvas is stupid and uninteresting, but it is here in the background and, as it were, in the background. On the first, the journey and relationships of Peter and his friends, with jokes and different situations. 'EuroTour' for teens with superheroic episodes. Overall, I liked it. 3D, by the way, is pleasant and perfectly done throughout the film, which has not been seen for a long time.
7 out of 10
One of the heroes of Far From Home says something like this: “People believe anything, so they are easy to fool.” In principle, this perfectly characterizes not only this film, but the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe. The sequel to “Spider-Man” is the closest example of how individual successful findings of the creative process positively affect the overall picture.
Twenty of some kind of MCU film – quackery in the literal and figurative sense of the word. It seems that the series has entered a phase where plot twists become the main feature. From the point of view of spoiler alert, the effect here is comparable to the grand finale of the conflict with Thanos, however, it is completely meaningless. The impressionable viewer will definitely be impressed, but on leaving the hall, it will be difficult for him to come up with a reason for what is worth praising the writers.
As a separate episode, Spider is also highly controversial. If in “Homecoming” the main character was in love with a girl and saved the world, then in “Far From Home” he is also in love with a girl and saves the world. The two main lines were not developed, the creators of the picture simply repeated the tested formula, only with other characters and other scenery. The sequel looks more expensive than the original, it can generally be called the best visual film MCU on par with “Doctor Strange”. In the latter, the work of computer graphics specialists was justified by the recreated world of sorcerers and their techniques. Spider seems to have done even more. That's just the accents in the tape are arranged so that graphic monsters and tricks look optional mandatory element of the blockbuster. In fact, the film, its core, is an homage to the youthful problem of self-determination. If in previous films, Parker tried to climb on the fence, now he seeks to escape from global problems. Global to the world, of course. For Peter, the problem is to confess his love for MJ. Well, to accept the fact that his mentor went to his forefathers, leaving a great gadget and his chauffeur friend.
How to have the courage to take the first decisive step if you are shy, how to build your alter ego into a coordinate system in which the world knows about the Avengers, but does not know where they are all now – the answers to these questions would be enough for three hours of cinematic reasoning. But it's a blockbuster, so the writers have put the universal evil and spectacular stunts in there. Collected together, the parts differing in initial tempo and semantic content barely connect with each other. A careful viewer's eye can easily see, well, or feel how a hundred millionth construction is cracking at the seams.
But it still works. Yes, vocabulary powdered narrow-profile movie aesthetes are scavenging shit with the signature smelly "fu-how-you-it-see-it-too-for-kid-and-imbicillus." But on the scale of history, toxic screams, as well as on-duty screams, as well as analytical analyses of inconsistencies (they are, yes) will mean absolutely nothing. Because we look like we're stuck on a needle. And so Marvel is going to raise a lot of money again. And let him collect. No film is a work of art, but as a commercial product, lovingly and soberly invented and promoted by Uncle Kevin Feige, it works. I said it seven, five, three years ago, and I repeat it now: this cinematic universe in all its recreated glory is a lucky ticket to Wonderland, but only the actors involved in it have benefited from it so far. Gyllenhaal in Far From Home is as cool as Michael Keaton in the first film and slightly less cool than usual. Well, he played his game and went on to play cool. And who, without looking at Kinopoisk, will remember what the director of this sequel did? Sounds sad, but not really. After all, Marvel is when everyone is happy. The studio gives little-known directors its moment of fame, actors from Oscar-winning and festival films – recognition among blockbuster fans, and as a result, new fans.
The MCU does me good, too. This year, she released three beautiful films. I see their flaws, but I do not want to scold them completely. I'm a guy with a little low self-esteem. So I need these superheroes and uncles behind the camera, and they're pushing through the pixels in my ears that anyone can be a hero. And I am grateful to makeup artists who do beautifully, and special effects masters, and actors, and cameramen who can shoot (I am picky about the picture, this is important to me). But especially thanks to Kevin Feige – it seems, the only producer in the world who knows how to make a good trending movie.
Tonight, the hall was packed almost to the limit. What kind of Godzilla can boast of this?
P.S. Mysterio in his suit is top. In addition to the Gyllenhaal mentioned above, I note Zendaya. At one point, she stole my heart naturally. There are two scenes after the credits, they're both important. You'll be thrilled with the first one and want a triquel right now. The second can shake your faith in the adequacy of the writers (provided you initially believed it).
If you happen to visit an exhibition of other works by Kevin Feige – you must pay attention to the fact that they are completely devoid of individuality, in the best traditions of mainstream art. And this mainstream will be fired up by its inhospitable smile: images of loneliness, depression, complexity and disconnection - all this is reflected in the works of Kevin Feige, flowing between the lines in the best traditions of another master Spielberg, who also masterfully paints his fairy tales ambiguously making it clear that he is a misanthrope and his films are far from good.
If you pay attention to ' Far From Home', then we have a classic example of the study of the problem of escapism, isolation and complexes of modern adolescents. If the previous series was about puberty, this time the director of Spider-Man on the instructions of the producer tries to sculpt a whole human sculpture with his consciousness from a piece of marble, but the spider remains the same plastic character to replace Tony Stark, who was printed on a 3D printer for the amusement of the plebs.
Characters, their costumes and masks are a metaphor for the mood prevailing in modern society. On the figure Mysterio & #39; thrown & #39; a canvas that can be interpreted as a shroud (a Christian relic accompanying a funeral ritual), but as a metaphorical embodiment of the mystery or closedness of the ball on the head. The main thing is to correctly interpret the signals that Feige and the director broadcast to us through actors, under the mask is not a friendly smile, but a grin of death, cynicism, a stampede of individuality. They say there are smiles under cover. Don't believe anyone. And if you go around the new spider ' behind', we see that the director’s hands are taken back and literally covered with cuts. To understand Feige better, you have to imagine the people on the set as models from which he molds his golem, often homeless people who have nothing to lose. The sculptor’s favorite materials are varieties of white, gray and black cynicism. To create a holistic image of Spider and his friends, Kevin uses patched bronze, resins, sometimes glass beads, beads and other small accessories, but the material is not important, the main message of Feige is to tell through his films that a person is unprotected and seeks to hide behind things and hollow objects of art is visible and so.
The spider is gloomy and not life-affirming, but at the same time resonates with many people, as evidenced by the billion-dollar box office of the latest works of Marvel. Resonance is quite understandable, expapism through the attraction - albeit simple, but still the solution of all problems for 2-3 hours. Spider presses with its rhythm, atmosphere, forced competition, grayness and hopelessness, ' people without faces', ' people in tights' Silent material in the skilled hands of the producer, which clearly conveys loneliness, despair, insecurity, shame and complexity.
The new Spider is breathtaking like golden domes. Like foot day. Like cyberbullying. Like Jigan clips. Like capop dancing in public. If I am asked which is better than dogma95 or a new spider, I will answer the spider. As spectacular as the action movie with Gosha Kutsenko. It’s as good as trying the garage for the first time. Like the ethers of Dima Kisilev and Guzeeva. Eating into memory like sleep paralysis. As interesting as the cut scenes from Rocketman. If you can stand for 2 hours in the theater admiring a spider - 1000 x-rays you do not need. Cheap pleasure, like shopping with aliexpress. The spider weaves its web upwards or is engaged in douching cinema, it is already up to the viewer to decide. Porcupines are porcupines.
Reality is full of disappointment. Review of Spider-Man: Far From Home
“Avengers: Endgame” ended on a sad but very important emotional note for the movie universe: the transfer of the relay. The audience received a new Captain America, a new ruler (ruler) of Asgard and a changed cast of Avengers, who paid tribute to the late Tony Stark, who cannot be replaced, because he is so alone in the whole world. So Spider-Man: Far From Home has set itself the impossible task of presenting a worthy replacement for Iron Man, showing Spider-Man as the future leader of the Marvel Cinematic Universe for the next ten years. First, it is necessary for the cinematic universe itself, and secondly, Spider-Man himself, as a character who finally came out of the shadows and became independent.
“Spider-Man: Far From Home begins just after the final minutes of Endgame, immediately explaining how the Earth has changed and how people’s relationships now work. By undoing Thanos’s click and bringing back half the population, the Avengers created a paradox. Five years everyone lived with loss, grew and moved on, five years passed for them, but not for those killed by Thanos. Therefore, those who were returned, dispersed, continued to live as if nothing had happened, with one exception: five years had passed for the whole world. This detail allowed the authors of Far From Home to get rid of a number of unnecessary characters from Homecoming, explaining their absence as growing up and finishing school. Thanks to this, the sequel concentrates its attention only on important characters, continuing to bend its line with school life, which is still a kind of tracing to the films of John Hughes.
The plot of the sequel, as in the first picture, is not surprising, and even repeats “Homecoming” structurally. However, Far From Home does not try to portray a supernova, since it is noticeable that it did not intend to pose as something that it is not. This is only a plus for the film, even though fatigue from the “twentieth” “Iron Man” is already beginning to appear in the audience. The only thing that the studio is still good, albeit with minor flaws, is the entertainment rails - "Far from Home" in this respect is not inferior to its older brothers. The light manner of narration is ideal for the film, reflecting the carefree youth, spoiled by only excessive teenage-flat humor - it is too much.
Carefree youth is perhaps one of the main stumbling blocks in the sequel. The themes of growing up and responsibility are important attributes of Spider-Man as a character. They did not go anywhere in Far From Home, having received one of the most interesting forms of reading in the history of the hero. Peter Parker at the age of 16 has experienced many events: he fought Captain America, flew into space, his mentor was Tony Stark himself, survived his own death and defeat in the battle with the Vulture in his first solo album. In any case, all this hardened him as a person. But despite the fact that Spider in the framework of the Marvel Cinematic Universe appears on the screens for the fifth time, behind his shoulders are not big victories. All of his achievements are more like personal growth than a superhero career as a defender and avenger.
The friendly neighbor in the sequel takes on the form that his fans and viewers of previous film interpretations of the character are used to. Far From Home closes the so-called Infinity Saga definitively - this is the last film of the third phase of the kinetic universe. That’s just the film is not as grandiose and large-scale as “Endgame”, it is not so important, because it more resembles the epilogue of “the Avengers”, rather than the entire franchise as a whole. The main conflict of the picture boils down to the personal fear of Peter Parker before responsibility, he is afraid to come out of the shadow of Tony Stark and show himself in all its glory, afraid to become an independent hero, plunged into the big adult world. It is understandable, because at some point the plot unfolds events in such a way that Spider-Man was intended for himself.
Peter Parker is a child, he faces a great responsibility, which will help him cope with great strength. Society needs an idol, needs a leader, needs someone they will believe in – all this was Tony Stark, and he saw something similar in the not quite simple kid from Queens in “Confrontation”, having raised his successor from him. Important fact: everyone understands that Spider-Man is not Iron Man, Peter Parker will never replace Tony Stark, and Tom Holland will not be compared to Robert Downey Jr., so this is the main experience of the character about his destiny. All of Spider’s expectations are divided into harsh reality, only having managed to come to terms with which he moves on, finally revealing his full potential, finally becoming a hero. The good in the film is the one who is subject to reality.
Mysterio is one of the brightest antagonists from the comics about Spider-Man, whose games with reality have repeatedly broken and knocked the protagonist out of balance. As always happens with Marvel, they were able to fit such an unusual but interesting character into the framework of their own cinematic universe. Mysterio is so authentic in changing reality that he was even able to trick the film itself into splitting it in two, so to speak. At a certain point in the story, Jake Gyllenhaal's character changes the rules of the game, turning the first hour of the tape into an unnecessary circus, which he ruled, leading the entire planet by the nose. In addition, Mysterio is not just another one-time villain - he is a trump card in the hand of Marvel, a trump card that gave the film one of the most powerful and interesting scenes in the history of the cinematic universe. Mysterio in business is a diamond of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, gracefully flirting with reality, managing to mock Spider so inventively that at some points he even manages to deceive the viewer himself, which is another plus in the character’s piggy bank.
But not only the villain “Far From Home” is one – this is another summer blockbuster from Marvel Studios with a one-time plot, opening a new chapter in the history of the cinematic universe, which is destined to lead forward by young superheroes. Spider-Man in the Marvel Cinematic Universe has come a long way, transforming from an arrogant teenager from Queens to a superhero, an honored member of the Avengers team. The trivial formation of the hero was stretched to five films, thereby making the character deeper, more interesting and closer to the audience. Every failure of Spider is a failure of his audience. The only thing that somehow spoils the hero is the main characters surrounding him, representing faded copies of their comic book originals. Fortunately with antagonists things are different, but from time to time to look at offended at Stark villains already begins to bother.